Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet Brn Trout blames dems.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
*looks at europe*
*looks at canada*
What the fuck are you talking about?
Much better then the Dems grandma killing policies in NY.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
No, we wouldn't be in this situation if we wouldn't have had unnecessary lockdowns. Look at the economies in democrat run states and cities. The proof is everywhere. You can deny it all you want but you're wrong.
Ahhh yes, the "herd mentality" approach of the Dithering Dotard and Scott Atlas. How did that work out for Sweden?
Tegnell’s prediction of a tapering epidemic curve and quickly-attained immunity never came to pass. Sweden’s per-capita case counts and death rates have been many times higher than any of its Nordic neighbors, all of which imposed lockdowns, travel bans, and limited gatherings early on. Over all in Sweden, thirteen thousand people have died from covid-19. In Norway, which has a population that is half the size of Sweden’s, and where stricter lockdowns were enforced, about seven hundred people have died. It’s likely that some simple policy changes—especially shutting down visitations to nursing homes sooner, and providing more P.P.E. and testing to nursing-home staff—would have saved lives. And the strategy doesn’t seem to have helped the economy much: the Swedish G.D.P. fell by around three per cent, better than the European average, but similar to the drop in other Nordic countries.Fredrik Elgh, a virologist at Umeå University and one of Tegnell’s former bosses, wishes that Sweden had implemented restrictions like those used by other countries in the region. “Why don’t they go the same route as our neighbors that have been so successful?” he said. “We could have done that, too, if we had followed their path.” The fatalities in the elder homes, which account for about fifty per cent of the covid-19 deaths in Sweden, seem especially needless; if visits to these facilities had been banned sooner, if their workers had been advised to wear masks and get tested frequently, it’s possible that thousands of lives could have been saved. People from both pro- and anti-Tegnell camps believe that this was an unnecessary tragedy. (Tegnell agrees, although he does not think that the responsibility lies solely with the health agency.)“The Swedish strategy aimed at protecting the elderly has failed,” Mats Melin, the country’s former chief justice and the current head of the government-appointed Corona Commission, told me. In December, Sweden’s King, Carl XVI Gustaf, criticized the country’s policies, telling the state broadcaster, “The Swedish people have suffered enormously in difficult conditions,” and adding that, when it came to the strategy that the country employed, “I think we have failed.” Stefan Lofven, the country's Prime Minister, told reporters, “The fact that so many people have died cannot be seen as anything else than a failure.”
![]()
Swedenâs Pandemic Experiment
When the coronavirus arrived, the country decided not to implement lockdowns or recommend masks. How has it fared?www.newyorker.com
You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
No, we wouldn't be in this situation if we wouldn't have had unnecessary lockdowns. Look at the economies in democrat run states and cities. The proof is everywhere. You can deny it all you want but you're wrong.
Ahhh yes, the "herd mentality" approach of the Dithering Dotard and Scott Atlas. How did that work out for Sweden?
Tegnell’s prediction of a tapering epidemic curve and quickly-attained immunity never came to pass. Sweden’s per-capita case counts and death rates have been many times higher than any of its Nordic neighbors, all of which imposed lockdowns, travel bans, and limited gatherings early on. Over all in Sweden, thirteen thousand people have died from covid-19. In Norway, which has a population that is half the size of Sweden’s, and where stricter lockdowns were enforced, about seven hundred people have died. It’s likely that some simple policy changes—especially shutting down visitations to nursing homes sooner, and providing more P.P.E. and testing to nursing-home staff—would have saved lives. And the strategy doesn’t seem to have helped the economy much: the Swedish G.D.P. fell by around three per cent, better than the European average, but similar to the drop in other Nordic countries.Fredrik Elgh, a virologist at Umeå University and one of Tegnell’s former bosses, wishes that Sweden had implemented restrictions like those used by other countries in the region. “Why don’t they go the same route as our neighbors that have been so successful?” he said. “We could have done that, too, if we had followed their path.” The fatalities in the elder homes, which account for about fifty per cent of the covid-19 deaths in Sweden, seem especially needless; if visits to these facilities had been banned sooner, if their workers had been advised to wear masks and get tested frequently, it’s possible that thousands of lives could have been saved. People from both pro- and anti-Tegnell camps believe that this was an unnecessary tragedy. (Tegnell agrees, although he does not think that the responsibility lies solely with the health agency.)“The Swedish strategy aimed at protecting the elderly has failed,” Mats Melin, the country’s former chief justice and the current head of the government-appointed Corona Commission, told me. In December, Sweden’s King, Carl XVI Gustaf, criticized the country’s policies, telling the state broadcaster, “The Swedish people have suffered enormously in difficult conditions,” and adding that, when it came to the strategy that the country employed, “I think we have failed.” Stefan Lofven, the country's Prime Minister, told reporters, “The fact that so many people have died cannot be seen as anything else than a failure.”
![]()
Swedenâs Pandemic Experiment
When the coronavirus arrived, the country decided not to implement lockdowns or recommend masks. How has it fared?www.newyorker.com
You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Much better then the Dems grandma killing policies in NY.
13K? Cuomo killed 13K some days before noon....then when it came to jobs killed 10x that.
That was such a bad spin job that it madeHas nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
Yet Brn Trout blames dems.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
*looks at europe*
*looks at canada*
What the fuck are you talking about?
McConnell ran and lost the senate opposing 1200 stimulus checks.You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Great approach huh. Dems 1.9 trillion bill.........only 9 percent goes to citizens. Lol.
Now you're complaining that blue states have more people and fewer EVs. Shove off, mateyWell jobs are usually mostly where people live.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
No, we wouldn't be in this situation if we wouldn't have had unnecessary lockdowns. Look at the economies in democrat run states and cities. The proof is everywhere. You can deny it all you want but you're wrong.
Not economic commerce. It was unnecessarily destroyed. "Essential", "Non essential"? Absolutely disgusting derogatory terms.
These Three Coronavirus Scenarios Explain Why Experts Are Warning Americans To Stay Home (forbes.com)Yet Brn Trout blames dems.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
*looks at europe*
*looks at canada*
What the fuck are you talking about?
Yeah, dems are to blame for the lockdowns that killed their economies. To deny that is denying reality.
no shit. Guess where most people live? LOLNow you're complaining that blue states have more people and fewer EVs. Shove off, mateyWell jobs are usually mostly where people live.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
No, we wouldn't be in this situation if we wouldn't have had unnecessary lockdowns. Look at the economies in democrat run states and cities. The proof is everywhere. You can deny it all you want but you're wrong.
Not economic commerce. It was unnecessarily destroyed. "Essential", "Non essential"? Absolutely disgusting derogatory terms.
On the contrary, not at all. The economies destroyed were mainly in blue states and cities. And yes, labeling someone essential or non essential is offensive and disgusting.
McConnell ran and lost the senate opposing 1200 stimulus checks.You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Great approach huh. Dems 1.9 trillion bill.........only 9 percent goes to citizens. Lol.
These Three Coronavirus Scenarios Explain Why Experts Are Warning Americans To Stay Home (forbes.com)Yet Brn Trout blames dems.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
*looks at europe*
*looks at canada*
What the fuck are you talking about?
Yeah, dems are to blame for the lockdowns that killed their economies. To deny that is denying reality.
And you've chosen to also ignore that we were out of ICU beds last summer.McConnell ran and lost the senate opposing 1200 stimulus checks.You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Great approach huh. Dems 1.9 trillion bill.........only 9 percent goes to citizens. Lol.
McConnell is corrupt. I don't even care that he lost the senate.
no shit. Guess where most people live? LOLNow you're complaining that blue states have more people and fewer EVs. Shove off, mateyWell jobs are usually mostly where people live.Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.
No, we wouldn't be in this situation if we wouldn't have had unnecessary lockdowns. Look at the economies in democrat run states and cities. The proof is everywhere. You can deny it all you want but you're wrong.
Not economic commerce. It was unnecessarily destroyed. "Essential", "Non essential"? Absolutely disgusting derogatory terms.
On the contrary, not at all. The economies destroyed were mainly in blue states and cities. And yes, labeling someone essential or non essential is offensive and disgusting.
Now you want to give failed donny some love, go for it.
And you've chosen to also ignore that we were out of ICU beds last summer.McConnell ran and lost the senate opposing 1200 stimulus checks.You might want to compare job #s for 20 and 21. Not that the dems are necessarily better on creating jobs, though they may be over the next few years, but the gop has been in power for both of the last two recessions. I'd say the one in 2000 was purely W's but no one is to blame for covid. Overall, I prefer the dems approach on relief of giving more money to all citizens rather than to just the employers.killing jobs and small business is what Dems do best...
Tragic
Great approach huh. Dems 1.9 trillion bill.........only 9 percent goes to citizens. Lol.
McConnell is corrupt. I don't even care that he lost the senate.
Has nothing to do with "Democrats" and everything to do with Donnie's botching of the pandemic response and idiot governors - Mostly in red states.