Revisionist history focusing on 1/6 is getting louder.

He didn't ask before Insurrection Day.

face-palm-gif.278959
If Nancy Pelosi created an environment where nobody could authorize the National Guard, then Nancy Pelosi is incompetent.

Either way, Nancy Pelosi knew there was a massive protest and Nancy Pelosi had the intelligence briefing stating that violence was expected.

Further, the day of, they did find bombs and suspicious packages in numerous places. Which we had warnings that this would happen.

Pelosi really showed that she is a danger by not accepting the request for the Nation Guard.

Faun, your idea that Pelosi had no idea of anything going on is pure fantasy on your part.
 
If Nancy Pelosi created an environment where nobody could authorize the National Guard, then Nancy Pelosi is incompetent.

Either way, Nancy Pelosi knew there was a massive protest and Nancy Pelosi had the intelligence briefing stating that violence was expected.

Further, the day of, they did find bombs and suspicious packages in numerous places. Which we had warnings that this would happen.

Pelosi really showed that she is a danger by not accepting the request for the Nation Guard.

Faun, your idea that Pelosi had no idea of anything going on is pure fantasy on your part.

I never said Pelosi had no idea. I said there's no evidence Pelosi was involved in the Capitol Police Board's decisions regarding the NG leading up to Insurrection Day.

Pelosi really showed that she is a danger by not accepting the request for the Nation Guard.

LOL

It's hysterical you would say that given your utter failure to present any evidence whatsoever that she was involved in that decision.
 
There was no insurrection day.

Of course there was. Insurrection is a violent attack against our government in opposition of execution of a law.

That is precisely what occurred on Insurrection Day when a mob violently broke into the Capitol in opposition of Congress certifying Biden's election victory.

But fear not. You're a con. It's not expected you possess the mental acuity to understand.

:itsok:
 
Yet the Seargent-at-Arms of the Capitol Police Board says he did ask.

Why do the people involved disagree with you?

Just because you can not prove something with Google, which is a very good political propaganda tool, does not mean it is true or untrue.

Now if you had access to the Standard Operating Procedure that dictates the activities of their job, you and I would know so much more.
the capitol police chief requested national guard several times, but was rebuffed by the capitol police board. BTW --- the capitol police board consists of two seargent-at-arms, one for house and another for senate.
 
I never said Pelosi had no idea. I said there's no evidence Pelosi was involved in the Capitol Police Board's decisions regarding the NG leading up to Insurrection Day.

Pelosi really showed that she is a danger by not accepting the request for the Nation Guard.

LOL

It's hysterical you would say that given your utter failure to present any evidence whatsoever that she was involved in that decision.
The evidence is that she is the Leader of Congress, and the testimony given by the Capitol Police Board
You are naive to think that the most powerful politician in Congress is not smart enough to hide evidence of her maleficence.
 
the capitol police chief requested national guard several times, but was rebuffed by the capitol police board. BTW --- the capitol police board consists of two seargent-at-arms, one for house and another for senate.
The Capitol Police Chief is a member of the Capitol Police Board

And who told no, to the Capitol Police Board? Or more specifically, who told no to the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives who reports to Nancy Pelosi.

Nancy Pelosi was told, and denied the request.
 
And who told no, to the Capitol Police Board? Or more specifically, who told no to the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives who reports to Nancy Pelosi
The Capitol Board (whom Sund was a member of) decided that it wasn’t necessary themselves. They didn’t ask anyone else.
 
You haven't proven she was asked before Insurrection Day.
Nor would it have mattered if she had been asked

She’s not in the chain of command.

Had Trump REALLY requested NG presence and in the unlikely event that she objected to it, all she could have done was complain publicly. Why? Because she has no power over the NG deployment
 
Not impossible, just armed, and organized. The J6 rioters were neither. Once they got in, which were told was death to Democracy, they were harmless and calmly walked around the interior of the building as police let more people in.

That’s not a threat.
Calmly waking around?

How did that window that Ashes was shot in get blown out?

Did “tourist” stumble into it?

Oh wait.. no. I saw video of an insurrectionist pounding on it with a helmet.

And I saw video of a MAGARAT stalking that cop up the staircase

And video of that massive scrum in that hallway on which a cop was almost crushed to death. Ya know… the scrum that killed that woman

Lying shit
 
Supposedly the Sergeants at Arms of the House and Senate, and the generals of the national guard. Although everyone involved disputes his account.
SUND claims he went around the chain of command and appealed directly to the head of the DC NG (Walker?). He rebuffed SUND because he can not consider a request by anyone other than Sec Def Miller
 
Supposedly the Sergeants at Arms of the House and Senate, and the generals of the national guard. Although everyone involved disputes his account.
So, they didn’t want “the optics”… How’d that work out?
 
The Capitol Board (whom Sund was a member of) decided that it wasn’t necessary themselves. They didn’t ask anyone else.
There is no proof of that.

Without access to all the documents, emails, texts, one on one conversations, you are speculating as to what happened.
 
Of course there was. Insurrection is a violent attack against our government in opposition of execution of a law.

That is precisely what occurred on Insurrection Day when a mob violently broke into the Capitol in opposition of Congress certifying Biden's election victory.

But fear not. You're a con. It's not expected you possess the mental acuity to understand.

:itsok:
There was no insurrection.
 
There is no proof of that.

Without access to all the documents, emails, texts, one on one conversations, you are speculating as to what happened.
That was the finding of the Senate committee who had access to all the documents, emails, text and interviewed the people involved.

But you’ve demonstrated one thing, you fabricated your claim about Pelosi denying support.
 

Forum List

Back
Top