Rightwingers, of whom I'm one, let the gay shit go

[Seawytch]

Every day, I am amazed at those who cannot simply tell the difference. And a little scared.

It is scary.

Essentially they are saying an adult having sex with a child is EQUAL to an adult having sex with a consenting adult.

Ignorance is scary...

 

[hazlnut]

Check your christian morality bullshit at the door and LEARN to pick your fights. Gays are a minute voting block but they DO have the support of many others.
Losing elections over trivial bullshit that only affects a few people while the debt and everything else spirals out of control makes no sense.

Lets focus on the things that matter to everyone and stop picking fights that alienate us over small things.

Sin is sin for believers so stop bitching about what Sally does with her tongue when Johnny is no better off when he envies the Harley in his neighbors garage.
If they want to partake in the hell aka marriage give it to them. It's a piece of fucking paper ultimately.

You're telling Tea Baggers to let go of their hate, which is based on fear, which is all they have….

 

[KevinWestern]

You're telling Tea Baggers to let go of their hate, which is based on fear, which is all they have….

I think people stopped using the phrase "tea baggers" a few years ago.

Also want to mention that I think it's unfair to generalize so much when speaking about large groups of people. It's wrong to say that "all blacks are x" or "gays are x", so why is OK to say that all "tea-party supporters are x"?

 

[sfcalifornia]

Here's the break down

ALLOWED:

Straight man marries straight woman
Straight man marries gay woman
Gay man marries straight woman
Gay man marries gay woman

NOT ALLOWED (except where they are in the 21st century when it comes to equal protection under the law:

Straight man marries straight man
Straight woman marries straight woman
Straight man marries gay man
Straight woman marries gay woman
Gay man marries gay man
Gay woman marries gay woman

So...the problem isn't being gay...the problem is on the GENDER of who you marry. Gender discrimination.

Ok, but your examples are foolish, two straight men or two straight women would never seek to marry. and not many straight women would want to marry a gay man.

its not gender, its what you choose to do with your gender-----------the issue is sexual orientation, not gender.

nice try, but FAIL

I knew a gay female that married a gay male in the military just so they could get off base housing.

So what makes you think that when gay marriage is legal, straight people won't marry each other for similar reasons?

????

What makes you think they don't already do?

 

[sfcalifornia]

Ok, but your examples are foolish, two straight men or two straight women would never seek to marry. and not many straight women would want to marry a gay man.

its not gender, its what you choose to do with your gender-----------the issue is sexual orientation, not gender.

nice try, but FAIL

How do you know that? They may want to do it for the benefits and legal protections and tax breaks.

Look at my list...the difference is GENDER, not sexual orientation. No state is stopping gay people from marrying people of the opposite GENDER...they are stopping people from marrying people of the same GENDER. It's gender discrimination, clear and simple.

continuing to discuss this is like pissing into the wind and complaining that your shoes are wet.

you are not going to change my mind and I am not going to change yours.

you think homosexuality is normal, I think its an aberation of the human condition.

the marriage argument is just a dodge to avoid the real issue.

outta here. have a nice life, use good lubrication. your ass was not designed to be a vagina.

Then why are straight guys using women's asses like it's one all the time?

 

[koshergrl]

How on earth would you know, sfc?

 

[Katzndogz]

Gays want to eliminate freedom of opinion. That's going to be a tough one. It isn't going to happen. Look at what 50 years of integration have done.

 

[KevinWestern]

Gays want to eliminate freedom of opinion. That's going to be a tough one. It isn't going to happen. Look at what 50 years of integration have done.

I've never heard a gay person say that it aught to be illegal to say you don't like them.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

Every day, I am amazed at those who cannot simply tell the difference. And a little scared.

It is scary.

Essentially they are saying an adult having sex with a child is EQUAL to an adult having sex with a consenting adult.

the gay argument is similar to the pedophile argument.....both claim they are being discriminated against.....one for gender and the other for age.....

heh....must be pretty tough these days for pedophiles.....children are now up to age 26....

 

[bodecea]

Every day, I am amazed at those who cannot simply tell the difference. And a little scared.

It is scary.

Essentially they are saying an adult having sex with a child is EQUAL to an adult having sex with a consenting adult.

the gay argument is similar to the pedophile argument.....both claim they are being discriminated against.....one for gender and the other for age.....

heh....must be pretty tough these days for pedophiles.....children are now up to age 26....

No it is not. Not even close. It is frightening to note that you cannot see the GLARING difference.

I would be afraid to take you out in public.....it's like you see no difference between two consenting people shaking hands and coming up to a child and hitting them. Scary!

 

[bodecea]

Gays want to eliminate freedom of opinion. That's going to be a tough one. It isn't going to happen. Look at what 50 years of integration have done.

I've never heard a gay person say that it aught to be illegal to say you don't like them.

Nor have I.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

It is scary.

Essentially they are saying an adult having sex with a child is EQUAL to an adult having sex with a consenting adult.

the gay argument is similar to the pedophile argument.....both claim they are being discriminated against.....one for gender and the other for age.....

heh....must be pretty tough these days for pedophiles.....children are now up to age 26....

No it is not. Not even close. It is frightening to note that you cannot see the GLARING difference.

I would be afraid to take you out in public.....it's like you see no difference between two consenting people shaking hands and coming up to a child and hitting them. Scary!

what glaring difference.....? both are perverts trying to pervert something...

 

[bodecea]

the gay argument is similar to the pedophile argument.....both claim they are being discriminated against.....one for gender and the other for age.....

heh....must be pretty tough these days for pedophiles.....children are now up to age 26....

No it is not. Not even close. It is frightening to note that you cannot see the GLARING difference.

I would be afraid to take you out in public.....it's like you see no difference between two consenting people shaking hands and coming up to a child and hitting them. Scary!

what glaring difference.....? both are perverts trying to pervert something...

Again, it concerns me that you are unable to tell the difference.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Every day, I am amazed at those who cannot simply tell the difference. And a little scared.

It is scary.

Essentially they are saying an adult having sex with a child is EQUAL to an adult having sex with a consenting adult.

Ignorance is scary...

Some actually aren’t ignorant, but know the argument is lost. They know homosexuality and pedophilia are not the same. They know the Constitution protects the civil liberties of same-sex couples. And they know to deny same-sex couples access to marriage law is unwarranted.

Consequently all they have left are lies and demagoguery.

 

[Katzndogz]

Gays want to eliminate freedom of opinion. That's going to be a tough one. It isn't going to happen. Look at what 50 years of integration have done.

I've never heard a gay person say that it aught to be illegal to say you don't like them.

Nor have I.

There are some bakers and photographers that would disagree with you.

What would happen if a nonconsenting baker agreed to make the same sex wedding cake exactly as specified and told the couple what perverts he thought they were? Maybe even put on a show and went full on Westboro for a half hour or so, but agreed to make the cake. Would the gay couple have a right to complain?

 

[Katzndogz]

Republican politicians need to let it go. It is just something democrats use to sucker republicans into a debate rather than talk about the serious democrat problems they have caused.

In some ways gay issues are like the knock out game. No politician will point out that the attackers are black and the victims white. In both instances opposition has to come from the people and the battles fought in the streets. This is not something that should reach politicians they can't be trusted anyway.

 

[bodecea]

I've never heard a gay person say that it aught to be illegal to say you don't like them.

Nor have I.

There are some bakers and photographers that would disagree with you.

What would happen if a nonconsenting baker agreed to make the same sex wedding cake exactly as specified and told the couple what perverts he thought they were? Maybe even put on a show and went full on Westboro for a half hour or so, but agreed to make the cake. Would the gay couple have a right to complain?

Depends on the public access laws in that state, doesn't it?

 

[FJO]

My advice to Republicans:

If you have a disagreement with a fellow Republican, air your differences in PRIVATE, away from the intrusive media microphones. Abide by Reagan's 11th Commandment about not hurting/harming a fellow Republican.

If your false pride and total lack of self-respect and gigantic ego don't allow you to use your questionable brains, stay out of the political lime light and run for office at another time, if and when your uselessness is more appreciated.

If you want to commit political suicide, bleat about abortion and gay marriage, but if you want to get elected, hold your views in dignified silence and enforce them by changing the laws AFTER you are elected, because sure as Hell you can not do anything unless you are.

And tell your potential voters that a Mormon or a Tea Partier is still better than a Socialist/Democrat and DON'T stay home out of spite on Election Day.

 

[Mac1958]

.

Republicans have convinced themselves that social issues just have to be a matter of politics and political interference.

Hey, just like Democrats.

What a coincidence, huh?

.

 

[SwimExpert]

You're not calling out anyone DUMMY.. You're telling people what they are allowed to believe in and what they can and cannot say.. IT'S FUCKING fascist and totally LEFTIST.. so lie in it, roll in shit with pigs you become one.. Sick of your melodramatic lectures anyhow.

You're right. He sounds alot like someone else I've seen on here. Some crazy chick with an avatar of a shadowy woman wearing a cowboy hat.