Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He,of course, was referring only to changing vote tallies after the votes were made.Besides, did you forget that Rosenstein stated that no evidence that any votes were affected or changed by this so called Russian hacking?
Which begs the question, why did he lie about those communications to begin with? Too many lies from too many Trump associates.
Of course Wikileaks is directly linked to Gucifer 2.0 of which Stone has been caught communicating with them too. Now we know how Stone knew so much about Russia's next move or the orders Stone gave to the Russians during the campaign to help Trump. Which means he also knew who stole the Podesta emails. , It's so obvious he was conspiring with Russia to help Trump, because of these communications he lied about. It's a matter of simple logic as to where all the email dumps came from, when they would get to their destination, and how. The whole puzzle fits perfectly if you think about it. Tell me I'm wrong, or better yet, show me where I could be wrong, based on the one fact that Stone got caught lying about his communications with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0.
More fake news diversion from treasonous CNN. If it was true and /or significant, then why did Mueller charge Stone only with "lying"? This will end up in the long list of CNN's du bunked lies, the most recent one was "Trump instructed Cohen to lie".
Hopefully the new attorney general Barr will start straitening things out and start locking up these traitors in the media and Deep State.
Locking up traitors will reduce Republican party by half with the Dump family leading the way
Locking up the traitors will include Hillary, Bill, Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, Homa Abadeen, a number of operatives and hacks at CNN / MSNBC / WAPO / NY Times, and many more in the Democracratic party and Deep State, etc. and that would be for starters. Equal justice.
That is a counter argument coming from an idiot that has no relevancy. The conspiracy to collude has been proven, making it an illegal election. Vote counts are not part of this conspiracy.Nope. No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia. Many have been bamboozled by the media and politicians into thinking so. Besides, did you forget that Rosenstein stated that no evidence that any votes were affected or changed by this so called Russian hacking?Well,maybe you were in a comma,but we all knew stop was colluding with WikiLeaks and the Russians 2 years ago. So yes, i am right.Wrong again.
And, during your coma, the Russian spy front account guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the WikiLeaks dump.
Which begs the question, why did he lie about those communications to begin with? Too many lies from too many Trump associates.
Of course Wikileaks is directly linked to Gucifer 2.0 of which Stone has been caught communicating with them too. Now we know how Stone knew so much about Russia's next move or the orders Stone gave to the Russians during the campaign to help Trump. Which means he also knew who stole the Podesta emails. , It's so obvious he was conspiring with Russia to help Trump, because of these communications he lied about. It's a matter of simple logic as to where all the email dumps came from, when they would get to their destination, and how. The whole puzzle fits perfectly if you think about it. Tell me I'm wrong, or better yet, show me where I could be wrong, based on the one fact that Stone got caught lying about his communications with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0.
More fake news diversion from treasonous CNN. If it was true and /or significant, then why did Mueller charge Stone only with "lying"? This will end up in the long list of CNN's du bunked lies, the most recent one was "Trump instructed Cohen to lie".
Hopefully the new attorney general Barr will start straitening things out and start locking up these traitors in the media and Deep State.
Locking up traitors will reduce Republican party by half with the Dump family leading the way
Locking up the traitors will include Hillary, Bill, Comey, McCabe, Clapper, Brennan, Homa Abadeen, a number of operatives and hacks at CNN / MSNBC / WAPO / NY Times, and many more in the Democracratic party and Deep State, etc. and that would be for starters. Equal justice.
In the mean time, conspiracy to collude has been proven between Russia and the Trump campaign; Feds: We have Roger Stone's communications with Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0 What is so great about this is, none of Trump's Sheep have made an intelligent case against it.
what were their national emergencies for? NOT some dumbass bs like trump is putting down while he plays golfWhat did the other presidents do the last 51 instances they declared national emergency in the last two decades?We have a great national emergency and trump is playing fn golf??Wrong again.So Trump's long time adviser colluded with Russian spies to release stolen emails.
You know, as we all have known for 2+ years.
By the way, the Russian connection with WiKi hasn't even been established. No conclusive proof has been provided except for accusations by the Left, and Assange is denying it. So far he's been correct.
Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia then go ahead and present it. Just because the Deep State, Leftist media, politicians, and brainwashed parrots like you keep repeating it, doesn't make it so.Nah, that's nonsense. We have the circumstantial evidence that only the Russians hacked and possessed the emails. We know their account claimed responsibility for passing them to WikiLeaks. We have communications between WikiLeaks and guccifer, including this:No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia
"“If you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo days prefable because the DNC is approaching,” the error-ridden message read. “and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.”
Basically, you aren't in possession of even the most basic facts regarding this topic and should probably stop talking now
Everything I mentioned is a fact. And the only reason it doesn't convince you is because you are a trump.cultist. period.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia
Have you heard of Google?! Actually the past presidents must have been picking their noses since those emergencies seemed much less significant and / or urgent than Trump trying to secure the border. He is sure to prevail in any court:what were their national emergencies for? NOT some dumbass bs like trump is putting down while he plays golfWhat did the other presidents do the last 51 instances they declared national emergency in the last two decades?We have a great national emergency and trump is playing fn golf??Wrong again.So Trump's long time adviser colluded with Russian spies to release stolen emails.
You know, as we all have known for 2+ years.
By the way, the Russian connection with WiKi hasn't even been established. No conclusive proof has been provided except for accusations by the Left, and Assange is denying it. So far he's been correct.
Show me a link showing conclusive evidence that WiKi got the leaked emails exposing the the truth, and the depravity and lies of Hillary and the Democratic Party, from the Russians.Everything I mentioned is a fact. And the only reason it doesn't convince you is because you are a trump.cultist. period.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia
And your embarrassing whataboutism has no bearing on anything.
Ha ha ha. You are a joke and an ignoramus infected with Trump derangement syndrome.That is a counter argument coming from an idiot that has no relevancy. The conspiracy to collude has been proven, making it an illegal election. Vote counts are not part of this conspiracy.Nope. No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia. Many have been bamboozled by the media and politicians into thinking so. Besides, did you forget that Rosenstein stated that no evidence that any votes were affected or changed by this so called Russian hacking?Well,maybe you were in a comma,but we all knew stop was colluding with WikiLeaks and the Russians 2 years ago. So yes, i am right.Wrong again.
And, during your coma, the Russian spy front account guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the WikiLeaks dump.
The facts are self explanatory. Without Russia, without Wikileaks, without Stone, Trump could have never presented his messaging campaign the way he did. "I'm going to be making an important announcement on Monday about Hillary Clinton", "Russia if you are listening", "I love Wikileaks". Assange announcing a big email scandal about Clinton. All this help from Russia and Wikileaks, would not have been possible, had it not been for the conduit of Stone. He was the lynch pin that made it all possible. And how did he do that? Through the exposed communications uncovered by Mueller from the search warrant of the 13 Russian spies who attacked the DNC and Hillary, who Stone communicated with. Folks, this isn't complicated to piece it together. It never has been. You'd have to be borderline retarded not to see how this whole puzzle fits so perfectly.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia then go ahead and present it. Just because the Deep State, Leftist media, politicians, and brainwashed parrots like you keep repeating it, doesn't make it so.Nah, that's nonsense. We have the circumstantial evidence that only the Russians hacked and possessed the emails. We know their account claimed responsibility for passing them to WikiLeaks. We have communications between WikiLeaks and guccifer, including this:No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia
"“If you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo days prefable because the DNC is approaching,” the error-ridden message read. “and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.”
Basically, you aren't in possession of even the most basic facts regarding this topic and should probably stop talking now
Perhaps you should look into why Hillary committed obstruction by destroying over 30,000 emails, or the Democratic Party refusing the FBI access to its "hacked" server. What exactly are they trying to hide? Rumors are that the hacked emails were done so by a Democratic operative on the inside.
The Senate has not concluded its investigation. The senate has not uncovered any "direct evidence". There is however a mountain of "circumstantial evidence". Do you know the difference?" Direct evidence" from almost all investigations never comes from "direct evidence". "Circumstantial evidence" carries the same weight. But Trump's stooges on this board don't have any idea what the two mean. Which is a good thing, because it throws them off course between reality and fantasy.Ha ha ha. You are a joke and an ignoramus infected with Trump derangement syndrome.That is a counter argument coming from an idiot that has no relevancy. The conspiracy to collude has been proven, making it an illegal election. Vote counts are not part of this conspiracy.Nope. No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia. Many have been bamboozled by the media and politicians into thinking so. Besides, did you forget that Rosenstein stated that no evidence that any votes were affected or changed by this so called Russian hacking?Well,maybe you were in a comma,but we all knew stop was colluding with WikiLeaks and the Russians 2 years ago. So yes, i am right.Wrong again.
And, during your coma, the Russian spy front account guccifer 2.0 claimed responsibility for the WikiLeaks dump.
The Senate just concluded its investigation that they found no evidence with respect to collusion, and Mueller will most likely find the same.
Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia
Aren't most of these declarations about war, conflicts, violence, and terrorism?" Are you saying a caravan of refugees turning themselves in at the border is akin to a Panzer division, necessary to require declaring a NE??Have you heard of Google?! Actually the past presidents must have been picking their noses since those emergencies seemed much less significant and / or urgent than Trump trying to secure the border. He is sure to prevail in any court:what were their national emergencies for? NOT some dumbass bs like trump is putting down while he plays golfWhat did the other presidents do the last 51 instances they declared national emergency in the last two decades?We have a great national emergency and trump is playing fn golf??Wrong again.So Trump's long time adviser colluded with Russian spies to release stolen emails.
You know, as we all have known for 2+ years.
By the way, the Russian connection with WiKi hasn't even been established. No conclusive proof has been provided except for accusations by the Left, and Assange is denying it. So far he's been correct.
Here's a list of the 31 national emergencies that have been in effect for years
Nov 14, 1979: The National Emergency With Respect to Iran, in response to the Iran hostage crisis.
President Bill Clinton
(AFP/Getty Images, FILE) President Bill Clinton walks out to make a statement to the media in the Rose Garden at the White House on Feb. 12, 1999....
Nov 14, 1994: The National Emergency With Respect to the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, that combined two previous national emergencies focused on weapons of mass destruction.
Jan. 2, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process placed economic sanctions in response to the Jerusalem bombing.
March 15, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources was an effort to prevent potential deals between oil companies.
October 21, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia was declared after increased reports of drug cartels laundering money through American companies.
March 1, 1996: The National Emergency With Respect to Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba was after civilian planes were shot down near Cuba
November 3, 1997: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan implemented economic and trade sanctions.
President George W. Bush
(Stephen Jaffe/AFP/Getty Images, FILE) President George W. Bush addresses the nation aboard the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln as it sails for Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, Calif....
June 26, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans imposed sanctions on those aiding Albanian insurgents in Macedonia
Aug 17, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Export Control Regulations renewed presidential power to control exports in a national emergency since the Export Administration Act of 1979 lapsed.
Sept 14, 2001: The National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.
Sept 23, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
March 6, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe was an effort to punish associates of Robert Mugabe.
May 22, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest was issued following the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
May 11, 2004: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria was in response to Syria supporting terrorist activity in Iraq.
June 16, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus was in response to charges of fraud in the Belarus presidential election.
Oct 27, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was in response to violence around the Congolese presidential election runoff.
Aug 1, 2007: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon was in response to a breakdown of the rule of law in Lebanon.
June 26, 2008: The National Emergency With Respect to Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea cited the risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material. President Trump renewed this June 22, 2018 citing the “existence and risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula and the actions and policies of the Government of North Korea continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat.”
President Barack Obama
(NurPhoto via Getty Images) President Barack Obama signs the Every Student Succeeds Act, Dec. 10, 2015, in Washington, DC.
April 12, 2010: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia was in respect to threats posed by Somali pirates.
February 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya froze the assets of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.
July 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Transnational Criminals was in response to the rise in crime by specific organizations: Los Zetas (Mexico), The Brothers’ Circle (former Soviet Union countries), the Yakuza (Japan), and the Camorra (Italy).
May 16, 2012: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen addressed political unrest within the Yemen government.
March 16, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine was in response to the Russian invasion of Crimea.
April 3, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan was in response to the ongoing civil war.
May 12, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic was in response to violence towards humanitarian aid workers.
March 8, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela was in response to human rights violations.
April 1, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities was in response to Chinese cyber attacks on the U.S.
Nov 23, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi was declared after a failed coup.
Yea, I noticed the reporter boxed him in on that one in the rose garden.BWK Republicans don't like facts Trump says he has the best facts but can't say where they came from .....His butt?Show me where it's a lie. Stop hiding like a pussy; Feds: We have Roger Stone's communications with Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0No one debates with you liars. It is impossible since if you loose the debate you start throwing a tantrum and hurling all manor of baseless accusations that only further the opinion held by most that you are an imbecile.All that, and you said nothing. My OP made all the points of which you are helpless to debate. Take a hike loser.You have no argument, you have no facts, stains like you play this same word game everyday. I can only figure they are so tiny and non-important that they get some charge out of pretending to win anonymous arguments, and anyone honest can see that posted link to something proves nothing, other than the posters belief in pixie dust, and their own well worn value.You obviously had to surrender my argument or else you would have countered my truth with an intelligent rebuttal. Instead, you went off like a retard saying nothing. You're an idiot with nothing to debate. Get lost.
Ha ha ha. So you have nothing to show but your own wishful thinking. Apparently you are in the advanced stage of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump saying publicly in front of millions "Russia if you are listening..." can only mean he isn't talking to them in any other way, dufus! Once again, crooked Hillary criminally obstructs justice by destroying 30,000 subpeonad emails and smashing 12 mobile devices with a hammer and Lunatics on the Left are only worried about Trump making a joke while on the campaign trail.The facts are self explanatory. Without Russia, without Wikileaks, without Stone, Trump could have never presented his messaging campaign the way he did. "I'm going to be making an important announcement on Monday about Hillary Clinton", "Russia if you are listening", "I love Wikileaks". Assange announcing a big email scandal about Clinton. All this help from Russia and Wikileaks, would not have been possible, had it not been for the conduit of Stone. He was the lynch pin that made it all possible. And how did he do that? Through the exposed communications uncovered by Mueller from the search warrant of the 13 Russian spies who attacked the DNC and Hillary, who Stone communicated with. Folks, this isn't complicated to piece it together. It never has been. You'd have to be borderline retarded not to see how this whole puzzle fits so perfectly.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia then go ahead and present it. Just because the Deep State, Leftist media, politicians, and brainwashed parrots like you keep repeating it, doesn't make it so.Nah, that's nonsense. We have the circumstantial evidence that only the Russians hacked and possessed the emails. We know their account claimed responsibility for passing them to WikiLeaks. We have communications between WikiLeaks and guccifer, including this:No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia
"“If you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo days prefable because the DNC is approaching,” the error-ridden message read. “and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.”
Basically, you aren't in possession of even the most basic facts regarding this topic and should probably stop talking now
Perhaps you should look into why Hillary committed obstruction by destroying over 30,000 emails, or the Democratic Party refusing the FBI access to its "hacked" server. What exactly are they trying to hide? Rumors are that the hacked emails were done so by a Democratic operative on the inside.
Aren't most of these declarations about war, conflicts, violence, and terrorism?" Are you saying a caravan of refugees turning themselves in at the border is akin to a Panzer division, necessary to require declaring a NE??Have you heard of Google?! Actually the past presidents must have been picking their noses since those emergencies seemed much less significant and / or urgent than Trump trying to secure the border. He is sure to prevail in any court:what were their national emergencies for? NOT some dumbass bs like trump is putting down while he plays golfWhat did the other presidents do the last 51 instances they declared national emergency in the last two decades?We have a great national emergency and trump is playing fn golf??Wrong again.
By the way, the Russian connection with WiKi hasn't even been established. No conclusive proof has been provided except for accusations by the Left, and Assange is denying it. So far he's been correct.
Here's a list of the 31 national emergencies that have been in effect for years
Nov 14, 1979: The National Emergency With Respect to Iran, in response to the Iran hostage crisis.
President Bill Clinton
(AFP/Getty Images, FILE) President Bill Clinton walks out to make a statement to the media in the Rose Garden at the White House on Feb. 12, 1999....
Nov 14, 1994: The National Emergency With Respect to the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, that combined two previous national emergencies focused on weapons of mass destruction.
Jan. 2, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Transactions with Terrorists Who Threaten to Disrupt the Middle East Peace Process placed economic sanctions in response to the Jerusalem bombing.
March 15, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Prohibiting Certain Transactions with Respect to the Development of Iranian Petroleum Resources was an effort to prevent potential deals between oil companies.
October 21, 1995: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Assets and Prohibiting Transactions with Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia was declared after increased reports of drug cartels laundering money through American companies.
March 1, 1996: The National Emergency With Respect to Regulations of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels with Respect to Cuba was after civilian planes were shot down near Cuba
November 3, 1997: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Sudanese Government Property and Prohibiting Transactions with Sudan implemented economic and trade sanctions.
President George W. Bush
(Stephen Jaffe/AFP/Getty Images, FILE) President George W. Bush addresses the nation aboard the nuclear aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln as it sails for Naval Air Station North Island, San Diego, Calif....
June 26, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Who Threaten International Stabilization Efforts in the Western Balkans imposed sanctions on those aiding Albanian insurgents in Macedonia
Aug 17, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Export Control Regulations renewed presidential power to control exports in a national emergency since the Export Administration Act of 1979 lapsed.
Sept 14, 2001: The National Emergency with Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.
Sept 23, 2001: The National Emergency With Respect to Persons who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism was in response to the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
March 6, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Zimbabwe was an effort to punish associates of Robert Mugabe.
May 22, 2003: The National Emergency With Respect to Protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and Certain Other Property in Which Iraq has an Interest was issued following the U.S. invasion of Iraq.
May 11, 2004: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons and Prohibiting the Export of Certain Goods to Syria was in response to Syria supporting terrorist activity in Iraq.
June 16, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus was in response to charges of fraud in the Belarus presidential election.
Oct 27, 2006: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was in response to violence around the Congolese presidential election runoff.
Aug 1, 2007: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Undermining the Sovereignty of Lebanon was in response to a breakdown of the rule of law in Lebanon.
June 26, 2008: The National Emergency With Respect to Continuing Certain Restrictions with Respect to North Korea cited the risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material. President Trump renewed this June 22, 2018 citing the “existence and risk of proliferation of weapons-usable fissile material on the Korean Peninsula and the actions and policies of the Government of North Korea continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat.”
President Barack Obama
(NurPhoto via Getty Images) President Barack Obama signs the Every Student Succeeds Act, Dec. 10, 2015, in Washington, DC.
April 12, 2010: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Somalia was in respect to threats posed by Somali pirates.
February 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Prohibiting Certain Transactions Related to Libya froze the assets of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.
July 25, 2011: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Transnational Criminals was in response to the rise in crime by specific organizations: Los Zetas (Mexico), The Brothers’ Circle (former Soviet Union countries), the Yakuza (Japan), and the Camorra (Italy).
May 16, 2012: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Persons Threatening the Peace, Security, or Stability of Yemen addressed political unrest within the Yemen government.
March 16, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Ukraine was in response to the Russian invasion of Crimea.
April 3, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons With Respect to South Sudan was in response to the ongoing civil war.
May 12, 2014: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in the Central African Republic was in response to violence towards humanitarian aid workers.
March 8, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property and Suspending Entry of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Venezuela was in response to human rights violations.
April 1, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking the Property of Certain Persons Engaging in Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities was in response to Chinese cyber attacks on the U.S.
Nov 23, 2015: The National Emergency With Respect to Blocking Property of Certain Persons Contributing to the Situation in Burundi was declared after a failed coup.
You believe Putin rather than our intelligence services? Like the POS in our WH?Ha ha ha. So you have nothing to show but your own wishful thinking. Apparently you are in the advanced stage of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump saying publicly in front of millions "Russia if you are listening..." can only mean he isn't talking to them in any other way, dufus! Once again, crooked Hillary criminally obstructs justice by destroying 30,000 subpeonad emails and smashing 12 mobile devices with a hammer and Lunatics on the Left are only worried about Trump making a joke while on the campaign trail.The facts are self explanatory. Without Russia, without Wikileaks, without Stone, Trump could have never presented his messaging campaign the way he did. "I'm going to be making an important announcement on Monday about Hillary Clinton", "Russia if you are listening", "I love Wikileaks". Assange announcing a big email scandal about Clinton. All this help from Russia and Wikileaks, would not have been possible, had it not been for the conduit of Stone. He was the lynch pin that made it all possible. And how did he do that? Through the exposed communications uncovered by Mueller from the search warrant of the 13 Russian spies who attacked the DNC and Hillary, who Stone communicated with. Folks, this isn't complicated to piece it together. It never has been. You'd have to be borderline retarded not to see how this whole puzzle fits so perfectly.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia then go ahead and present it. Just because the Deep State, Leftist media, politicians, and brainwashed parrots like you keep repeating it, doesn't make it so.Nah, that's nonsense. We have the circumstantial evidence that only the Russians hacked and possessed the emails. We know their account claimed responsibility for passing them to WikiLeaks. We have communications between WikiLeaks and guccifer, including this:No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia
"“If you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo days prefable because the DNC is approaching,” the error-ridden message read. “and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.”
Basically, you aren't in possession of even the most basic facts regarding this topic and should probably stop talking now
Perhaps you should look into why Hillary committed obstruction by destroying over 30,000 emails, or the Democratic Party refusing the FBI access to its "hacked" server. What exactly are they trying to hide? Rumors are that the hacked emails were done so by a Democratic operative on the inside.
I don't believe anybody. Let's not forget that Wikileaks was the Left's darling freedom fighter when they were exposing GW Bush's emails. Not so much when it's Hillary and the truth about her and the Democrat party that's being exposed, suddenly he public enemy number 1:You believe Putin rather than our intelligence services? Like the POS in our WH?Ha ha ha. So you have nothing to show but your own wishful thinking. Apparently you are in the advanced stage of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Trump saying publicly in front of millions "Russia if you are listening..." can only mean he isn't talking to them in any other way, dufus! Once again, crooked Hillary criminally obstructs justice by destroying 30,000 subpeonad emails and smashing 12 mobile devices with a hammer and Lunatics on the Left are only worried about Trump making a joke while on the campaign trail.The facts are self explanatory. Without Russia, without Wikileaks, without Stone, Trump could have never presented his messaging campaign the way he did. "I'm going to be making an important announcement on Monday about Hillary Clinton", "Russia if you are listening", "I love Wikileaks". Assange announcing a big email scandal about Clinton. All this help from Russia and Wikileaks, would not have been possible, had it not been for the conduit of Stone. He was the lynch pin that made it all possible. And how did he do that? Through the exposed communications uncovered by Mueller from the search warrant of the 13 Russian spies who attacked the DNC and Hillary, who Stone communicated with. Folks, this isn't complicated to piece it together. It never has been. You'd have to be borderline retarded not to see how this whole puzzle fits so perfectly.Once again, if you have "facts" that WiKi received anything from Russia then go ahead and present it. Just because the Deep State, Leftist media, politicians, and brainwashed parrots like you keep repeating it, doesn't make it so.Nah, that's nonsense. We have the circumstantial evidence that only the Russians hacked and possessed the emails. We know their account claimed responsibility for passing them to WikiLeaks. We have communications between WikiLeaks and guccifer, including this:No evidence has been presented that Wiki has ties to Russia
"“If you have anything hillary related we want it in the next tweo days prefable because the DNC is approaching,” the error-ridden message read. “and she will solidify bernie supporters behind her after.”
Basically, you aren't in possession of even the most basic facts regarding this topic and should probably stop talking now
Perhaps you should look into why Hillary committed obstruction by destroying over 30,000 emails, or the Democratic Party refusing the FBI access to its "hacked" server. What exactly are they trying to hide? Rumors are that the hacked emails were done so by a Democratic operative on the inside.
Which begs the question, why did he lie about those communications to begin with? Too many lies from too many Trump associates.
Of course Wikileaks is directly linked to Gucifer 2.0 of which Stone has been caught communicating with them too. Now we know how Stone knew so much about Russia's next move or the orders Stone gave to the Russians during the campaign to help Trump. Which means he also knew who stole the Podesta emails. , It's so obvious he was conspiring with Russia to help Trump, because of these communications he lied about. It's a matter of simple logic as to where all the email dumps came from, when they would get to their destination, and how. The whole puzzle fits perfectly if you think about it. Tell me I'm wrong, or better yet, show me where I could be wrong, based on the one fact that Stone got caught lying about his communications with Wikileaks and Gucifer 2.0.
No one cares if he communicated with people that knew about the wiki Hillary emails. No such communications are illegal. But he says he didn’t communicate with them directly, so what if he heard rumors through third parties? Again, nothing illegal.
