Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[progressive hunter]

nf.23.08.27
#10,577

Absolutely not. You are saying she has a contract with a brainless fetus to give life support with full term gestation until live birth.

How are you involved in securing that contract at the moment of conception,

If she has unprotected sex and gets pregnant the fetus is part of her body and as you say her body provides life support

She does not need a part of her body to grant permission to the conscious part of her being to cut ifc life support to the part. The new part is not a person. It is bodily autonomy.

nf.23.08,27

youre repeating yourself,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

youre repeating yourself,,

I see. you are stuck. You went quite far

Now you need to explain why when a woman is pregnant they have to give permission to themselves for their bodies to not be used for life support to a brainless fetus. That is an absurd contention.

 

[progressive hunter]

I see. you are stuck. You went quite far

Now you need to explain why when a woman is pregnant they have to give permission to themselves for their bodies to not be used for life support to a brainless fetus. That is an absurd contention.

she already gave permission when she got pregnant,,

you may want to go read the definition of gestation and fetus and get back to me with your lame ass ideas,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

youre repeating yourself,,

I asked a new question. You avoided it.

How are you involved in securing that contract at the moment of conception?

 

[progressive hunter]

I asked a new question. You avoided it.

How are you involved in securing that contract at the moment of conception?

when did I say I was involved at conception??

 

[NotfooledbyW]

she already gave permission when she got pregnant,,

She gives permission to herself to terminate a part of herself, Why are you involved? You have no role.

 

[progressive hunter]

She gives permission to herself to terminate a part of herself, Why are you involved? You have no role.

its not a part of herself,,

we all have a role in protecting children from being murdered,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

when did I say I was involved at conception??

When you said She gives her permission to use her body for full term gestation you must be lying because she doesn’t have to give permission to herself Or She must be giving her permission to you BIG BROTHER.

 

[NotfooledbyW]

its not a part of herself,,

Then why dies that not part need to use her body for life support?

 

[progressive hunter]

When you said She gives her permission to use her body for full term gestation you must be lying because she doesn’t have to give permission to herself Or She must be giving her permission to you BIG BROTHER.

she gave her permission by allowing it to happen,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Then why dies that not part need to use her body for life support?

youre so fucking stupid you didnt realize you just refuted your own comment,,

if its life support proves its not her body, but a separate body dependent on her for survival,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

its not a part of herself,,

If she aborts at fifteen weeks there is only one neurological system with a brain and consciousness. So where is the science that the fetus is not part of that?

 

[progressive hunter]

If she aborts at fifteen weeks there is only one neurological system with a brain and consciousness. So where is the science that the fetus is not part of that?

so you admit that its a living growing child in her,,,

thats progress,,

 

[progressive hunter]

If she aborts at fifteen weeks there is only one neurological system with a brain and consciousness. So where is the science that the fetus is not part of that?

have you looked up what the definition of fetus is yet?? you should so you can use it in the proper context,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

if its life support proves its not her body, but a separate body dependent on her for survival,,

No. If it cannot live without it’s mother’s brsin and neurological system sustaining it, it is a part of it’s mother’s brain and neurological system until it can live without it as an independent human being on its own with consciousness of its own

My Two month old grandaughter has consciousness and an independent life of her own, I’m a retired grandpa so I’m doing full time daycare after Labor Day but I spend several hours a day with her and It’s amazing how wonderful our relationship is.

I see every day that she is no longer a part of her mother. Her own person

 

[progressive hunter]

No. If it cannot live without her brsin and neurological system sustaining it, it is a part of her brsin and neurological system until it can live without it as an independent human being on its own with consciousness of its own

My Two month old grandaughter has consciousness and an independent life of her own, I’m a retired grandpa so I’m doing daycare after Labor Day but I spend several hours a day with her and It’s amazing how wonderful our relationship is.

I see every day that she is no longer a part of her mother. Her own person

a newborn cant live without help,,

I couldnt give a shit about you or your grand baby that didnt get killed,,


you baby killers sure do come up with some weird excuses to murder innocent children,,,

you should tell your grand baby all about how she got lucky her mother didnt have her murdered,,

but I bet you dont,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

prgrssvhntr.23.08.27
#10,594

have you looked up what the definition of fetus is yet??

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind
specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

My argument is based o the fact that no fetus had ever been born prior to 21 weeks with S sufficiently developed brain and neural activity of it’s own to sustain its own independent life no longer being a part of its mother.

 

[progressive hunter]

prgrssvhntr.23.08.27
#10,594

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind
specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

My argument is based o the fact that no fetus had ever been born prior to 21 weeks with S sufficiently developed brain and neural activity of it’s own to sustain its own independent life no longer being a part of its mother.

next time youre with your grand baby I want you to get a vacuum cleaner out and explain to her how her mother could have had a doctor use a vacuum like that to suck what there is of her body out through her moms cooch,, so she should be happy to be alive,,,


and you really need to buy a dictionary so you can see the definition of a fetus,,

 

[NotfooledbyW]

but I bet you dont,,

I’m telling her how Republicans think they own your body so never vote for a Republican ever. They will make you a Reproductive Slave and they put the nation of your birth through Trump.

Her daddy is a Marine Corps Vet

 

[NotfooledbyW]

: an unborn or unhatched vertebrate especially after attaining the basic structural plan of its kind
specifically : a developing human from usually two months after conception to birth

and you really need to buy a

already did .