JoeB131
Diamond Member
No one gets libs mad like Romney lol. He stays on their mind.
Romney should get everyone mad. He makes republicans look like assholes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one gets libs mad like Romney lol. He stays on their mind.
Well by that logic, Hillary shouldn't run. Of course, you never worry about logic.
well, no, Hillary has only taken one shot at the nomination.
The Weird Mormon Robot has had two.
Oh, that's a convenient statistical nuance. How about you just say you're full of it and save everyone some time.
well, no, it's really not. First, in Hillary's first run, she actually got MORE votes than Obama did. Obama won because the rules disallowed some delegates from being counted and allowed superdelegates to make the final decision. That means she's really entitled to another shot if the voters will have her.
Romney, on the other hand, lost big time in 2008, in 2012, he ran against guys who were fucking jokes and still struggled, and got beaten by a president who all statistical models said he should have beaten. And he lost it by being stupid.
"Romney Considering Another Run"
apparently Seabiscuit is too.
My money is on the horse.
What does everyone think of the rumored "three pillar" platform a Romney 2016 campaign will run on? I think the three pillars are (1) battling poverty, (2) something about the middle class, and (3) America looking confident and operating strong in foreign policy
Those in the room told Romney that he needed to outline a clear rationale for getting into the race, and Romney outlined the three issues that were driving him: poverty, foreign affairs, and long-term economic stability.
But nearly an hour of the 90-minute session was devoted to Romney’s past campaign, and what he needs to fix if he runs another. Several were adamant: He had to clean house, and couldn’t rely on the same team as he did last time. Romney agreed, telling the room that he had been led down the wrong path on some things, and his campaign failed to fully articulate his rationale for running.
They urged Romney to be more comfortable in public, to come across like he did in the documentary “MITT,” released last year. Some close to Romney say they’ve seen a looser side to him lately, citing him putting bunny ears over former Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown during Governor Charlie Baker’s inauguration.
In private Mitt Romney starting to outline rationale for third presidential campaign - Politics - The Boston Globe
Damn! I love Magic Underpants and The Dancing Horse, my favorite variety act.Looks like the Mormon Moron is already circling the drain.
Mitt 3.0 Fails To Impress Conservatives At Major Conference In Washington
So, you're saying that Romney doesn't even need Iowa.....I can live with that.
I'm saying the fact that Romney can't win Iowa probably says he's a weak candidate.
Here's the thing. He won in 2012 because everyone else was a joke. He had no serious opponent, but he was slugging it out the whole way with a series of "Not-Romneys" that caught the electorate's eyes.
And despite outspending all his opponents by a huge margin, he really didn't lock it up until late.
Now, he's already got a reputation as a two-time loser, Bush is going to have the whole Bush Dynasty thing going for him and unlimited resources.
I think you missed the point but go ahead and focus on one line to frame the point out of contextWhat does everyone think of the rumored "three pillar" platform a Romney 2016 campaign will run on? I think the three pillars are (1) battling poverty, (2) something about the middle class, and (3) America looking confident and operating strong in foreign policy
Those in the room told Romney that he needed to outline a clear rationale for getting into the race, and Romney outlined the three issues that were driving him: poverty, foreign affairs, and long-term economic stability.
But nearly an hour of the 90-minute session was devoted to Romney’s past campaign, and what he needs to fix if he runs another. Several were adamant: He had to clean house, and couldn’t rely on the same team as he did last time. Romney agreed, telling the room that he had been led down the wrong path on some things, and his campaign failed to fully articulate his rationale for running.
They urged Romney to be more comfortable in public, to come across like he did in the documentary “MITT,” released last year. Some close to Romney say they’ve seen a looser side to him lately, citing him putting bunny ears over former Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown during Governor Charlie Baker’s inauguration.
In private Mitt Romney starting to outline rationale for third presidential campaign - Politics - The Boston Globe
Yes, bunny ears. That's what every campaign needs.
So, you're saying that Romney doesn't even need Iowa.....I can live with that.
I'm saying the fact that Romney can't win Iowa probably says he's a weak candidate.
Here's the thing. He won in 2012 because everyone else was a joke. He had no serious opponent, but he was slugging it out the whole way with a series of "Not-Romneys" that caught the electorate's eyes.
And despite outspending all his opponents by a huge margin, he really didn't lock it up until late.
Now, he's already got a reputation as a two-time loser, Bush is going to have the whole Bush Dynasty thing going for him and unlimited resources.
In fact, Mitt Romney was mired at a composite of 23% or less for 26 months straight, until March 2012. He won because all of the others we like flavor of the week or month and then fell to the wayside. Remember "Moonbase" Gingrich, "9-9-9" Cain, "$2 gas" crazy eyes Bachmann, "the blahs...." Santorum (don't google that word!), "let em die" Paul..... ahhhh, those were the days.
Right click the image location. If you need the article, do a search.
I think you missed the point but go ahead and focus on one line to frame the point out of contextWhat does everyone think of the rumored "three pillar" platform a Romney 2016 campaign will run on? I think the three pillars are (1) battling poverty, (2) something about the middle class, and (3) America looking confident and operating strong in foreign policy
Those in the room told Romney that he needed to outline a clear rationale for getting into the race, and Romney outlined the three issues that were driving him: poverty, foreign affairs, and long-term economic stability.
But nearly an hour of the 90-minute session was devoted to Romney’s past campaign, and what he needs to fix if he runs another. Several were adamant: He had to clean house, and couldn’t rely on the same team as he did last time. Romney agreed, telling the room that he had been led down the wrong path on some things, and his campaign failed to fully articulate his rationale for running.
They urged Romney to be more comfortable in public, to come across like he did in the documentary “MITT,” released last year. Some close to Romney say they’ve seen a looser side to him lately, citing him putting bunny ears over former Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown during Governor Charlie Baker’s inauguration.
In private Mitt Romney starting to outline rationale for third presidential campaign - Politics - The Boston Globe
Yes, bunny ears. That's what every campaign needs.
I was sort of musing myself with your Iowa rants. Dude, Iowa doesn't decide the winner. They can give whomever a boost. And it's not about being 'entitled,' shmutz.
In fact, Mitt Romney was mired at a composite of 23% or less for 26 months straight, until March 2012. He won because all of the others we like flavor of the week or month and then fell to the wayside. Remember "Moonbase" Gingrich, "9-9-9" Cain, "$2 gas" crazy eyes Bachmann, "the blahs...." Santorum (don't google that word!), "let em die" Paul..... ahhhh, those were the days.