NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
did I make the claim that they did or did not fudge the numbers? just pointing out your defense they did not do it because it didn't work is idiotic. I reserve my judgment if it was or was not done till more evidence is provided
The thread title says Romney was robbed. Do you need an explanation as to how that makes my 'defense' relevant?
it is not relevant because it is a ridicules defense saying it didn't work there for they didn't do it
Who is the burden of proof on?