Rump to sue media for giving voice to women

[bodecea]

CNN Money:

>> Lawyers for Donald Trump are "drafting" lawsuits against The New York Times and The Palm Beach Post, hours after those newspapers published separate reports in which women claimed Trump had touched them inappropriately.

Two high-ranking Trump campaign sources confirmed to CNNMoney that a lawsuit against the Times was in the works, but has not been filed. One source said the campaign was also drafting a lawsuit against the Post.

.... The Times story features two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks, who say that Trump made inappropriate physical advances. The Post story features a woman named Mindy McGillivray who says she was groped by Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 23. CNN has not been able to independently confirm their accounts.<<​

Get that? His Cheeto-ness wants to sue ---- or wants us to believe he will sue ---- two newspapers for reporting what three women said. As if he can make them sit down and shut up through the court system.

Get that? He's actually trying to use the United States judicial system as his pimp.


Rump's actually pretending to be so stupid as to take the position that the newspapers themselves are alleging these gropings, as opposed to simply reporting that three women recounted them, which is indisputable.

It calls to mind (once again) his assault on the First Amendment during the campaign:

​

And yet, in his Bubble of Doublethink, Orange Crash actually attributes one of his favorite adjectives to the journalist doing her job, getting his side of the story --- "disgusting". An adjective that the women on the other end of such assaults have far more credibility using to describe Rump's actions....

>> When Times reporter Megan Twohey interviewed Trump by phone on Tuesday night, "he threatened to sue us if we published these allegations," Twohey told CNNMoney. She quoted Trump as saying that "none of this ever took place" and calling her "a disgusting human being." <<​

Twohey also received a legal letter from a Trump attorney on Wednesday afternoon.​

But for a moment imagine if Rump actually followed through with the ruse of pretending he was actually suing for libel. This is where it gets interesting.

>> If the Trump campaign does proceed with lawsuits, it will give both the Times and the Post the opportunity to pursue discovery and request information on Trump's entire sexual history, because Trump would have the burden of proving falsity and actual malice.<<

Place yer bets.

Good....let him try.

 

[bripat9643]

Either that or they heard Sexual Predator Trump lie about it only being talk and not deeds

The timing of this is suspect and so is your integrity.

It is timed exactly with Sexual Predator Trump's lie!
Why is that suspicious? If Trump hadn't lied first they would have said nothing.

They're timed to coincide with all the Wikileaks email releases that are going to sink Hillary and land her in prison.

 

[nat4900]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

 

[bodecea]

CNN Money:

>> Lawyers for Donald Trump are "drafting" lawsuits against The New York Times and The Palm Beach Post, hours after those newspapers published separate reports in which women claimed Trump had touched them inappropriately.

Two high-ranking Trump campaign sources confirmed to CNNMoney that a lawsuit against the Times was in the works, but has not been filed. One source said the campaign was also drafting a lawsuit against the Post.

.... The Times story features two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks, who say that Trump made inappropriate physical advances. The Post story features a woman named Mindy McGillivray who says she was groped by Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 23. CNN has not been able to independently confirm their accounts.<<​

Get that? His Cheeto-ness wants to sue ---- or wants us to believe he will sue ---- two newspapers for reporting what three women said. As if he can make them sit down and shut up through the court system.

Get that? He's actually trying to use the United States judicial system as his pimp.


Rump's actually pretending to be so stupid as to take the position that the newspapers themselves are alleging these gropings, as opposed to simply reporting that three women recounted them, which is indisputable.

It calls to mind (once again) his assault on the First Amendment during the campaign:

​

And yet, in his Bubble of Doublethink, Orange Crash actually attributes one of his favorite adjectives to the journalist doing her job, getting his side of the story --- "disgusting". An adjective that the women on the other end of such assaults have far more credibility using to describe Rump's actions....

>> When Times reporter Megan Twohey interviewed Trump by phone on Tuesday night, "he threatened to sue us if we published these allegations," Twohey told CNNMoney. She quoted Trump as saying that "none of this ever took place" and calling her "a disgusting human being." <<​

Twohey also received a legal letter from a Trump attorney on Wednesday afternoon.​

But for a moment imagine if Rump actually followed through with the ruse of pretending he was actually suing for libel. This is where it gets interesting.

>> If the Trump campaign does proceed with lawsuits, it will give both the Times and the Post the opportunity to pursue discovery and request information on Trump's entire sexual history, because Trump would have the burden of proving falsity and actual malice.<<

Place yer bets.

Well malice would be a walk in the park, especially with the NYT which has already broken federal law publishing his tax forms.

Completely irrelevant here.

You've never been in a courtroom I take it.

I believe his lawyers could tie it in easily to a defamation suit. I would think it would be up to the defense to prove absence of malice which at this stage with the NYT would be a bitch to prove.

Which, if you read the OP you'd know, the NYT lawyers can file for discovery on all sorts of cool Drumpf history.

 

[Norman]

Suddenly the dems are caring whether someone is pervert or not. Where have they all been all this time?


Further, where have the victims been all this time? Suddenly they just come up after the attack tape.


I think Trump may have a case.

 

[nat4900]

Which, if you read the OP you'd know, the NYT lawyers can file for discovery on all sorts of cool Drumpf history.

and....discovery is ALSO the reason why Trump has laid off the expose on his 2005 tax forms.

 

[bodecea]

CNN Money:

>> Lawyers for Donald Trump are "drafting" lawsuits against The New York Times and The Palm Beach Post, hours after those newspapers published separate reports in which women claimed Trump had touched them inappropriately.

Two high-ranking Trump campaign sources confirmed to CNNMoney that a lawsuit against the Times was in the works, but has not been filed. One source said the campaign was also drafting a lawsuit against the Post.

.... The Times story features two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks, who say that Trump made inappropriate physical advances. The Post story features a woman named Mindy McGillivray who says she was groped by Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 23. CNN has not been able to independently confirm their accounts.<<​

Get that? His Cheeto-ness wants to sue ---- or wants us to believe he will sue ---- two newspapers for reporting what three women said. As if he can make them sit down and shut up through the court system.

Get that? He's actually trying to use the United States judicial system as his pimp.


Rump's actually pretending to be so stupid as to take the position that the newspapers themselves are alleging these gropings, as opposed to simply reporting that three women recounted them, which is indisputable.

It calls to mind (once again) his assault on the First Amendment during the campaign:

​

And yet, in his Bubble of Doublethink, Orange Crash actually attributes one of his favorite adjectives to the journalist doing her job, getting his side of the story --- "disgusting". An adjective that the women on the other end of such assaults have far more credibility using to describe Rump's actions....

>> When Times reporter Megan Twohey interviewed Trump by phone on Tuesday night, "he threatened to sue us if we published these allegations," Twohey told CNNMoney. She quoted Trump as saying that "none of this ever took place" and calling her "a disgusting human being." <<​

Twohey also received a legal letter from a Trump attorney on Wednesday afternoon.​

But for a moment imagine if Rump actually followed through with the ruse of pretending he was actually suing for libel. This is where it gets interesting.

>> If the Trump campaign does proceed with lawsuits, it will give both the Times and the Post the opportunity to pursue discovery and request information on Trump's entire sexual history, because Trump would have the burden of proving falsity and actual malice.<<

Place yer bets.

Trump has a powerful case.

There are anti-biotics for that.

 

[nat4900]

Further, where have the victims been all this time? Suddenly they just come up after the attack tape.

Is that ALSO the Bill Clinton "defense".....??? LOL

 

[NYcarbineer]

CNN Money:

>> Lawyers for Donald Trump are "drafting" lawsuits against The New York Times and The Palm Beach Post, hours after those newspapers published separate reports in which women claimed Trump had touched them inappropriately.

Two high-ranking Trump campaign sources confirmed to CNNMoney that a lawsuit against the Times was in the works, but has not been filed. One source said the campaign was also drafting a lawsuit against the Post.

.... The Times story features two women, Jessica Leeds and Rachel Crooks, who say that Trump made inappropriate physical advances. The Post story features a woman named Mindy McGillivray who says she was groped by Trump at Mar-a-Lago when she was 23. CNN has not been able to independently confirm their accounts.<<​

Get that? His Cheeto-ness wants to sue ---- or wants us to believe he will sue ---- two newspapers for reporting what three women said. As if he can make them sit down and shut up through the court system.

Get that? He's actually trying to use the United States judicial system as his pimp.


Rump's actually pretending to be so stupid as to take the position that the newspapers themselves are alleging these gropings, as opposed to simply reporting that three women recounted them, which is indisputable.

It calls to mind (once again) his assault on the First Amendment during the campaign:

​

And yet, in his Bubble of Doublethink, Orange Crash actually attributes one of his favorite adjectives to the journalist doing her job, getting his side of the story --- "disgusting". An adjective that the women on the other end of such assaults have far more credibility using to describe Rump's actions....

>> When Times reporter Megan Twohey interviewed Trump by phone on Tuesday night, "he threatened to sue us if we published these allegations," Twohey told CNNMoney. She quoted Trump as saying that "none of this ever took place" and calling her "a disgusting human being." <<​

Twohey also received a legal letter from a Trump attorney on Wednesday afternoon.​

But for a moment imagine if Rump actually followed through with the ruse of pretending he was actually suing for libel. This is where it gets interesting.

>> If the Trump campaign does proceed with lawsuits, it will give both the Times and the Post the opportunity to pursue discovery and request information on Trump's entire sexual history, because Trump would have the burden of proving falsity and actual malice.<<

Place yer bets.

Good. I hope Trump nails them for $100 million.

lol, the litigious anarchist. Too funny.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Lawyers for Donald Trump are "drafting" lawsuits against The New York Times and The Palm Beach Post,

Another head fake, he's not drafting anything. He still has investigators in Hawaii who found very interesting stuff on Obama...remember?

 

[Pogo]

Either that or they heard Sexual Predator Trump lie about it only being talk and not deeds

The timing of this is suspect and so is your integrity.

It is timed exactly with Sexual Predator Trump's lie!
Why is that suspicious? If Trump hadn't lied first they would have said nothing.

The lie is the accusation

Sexual Predator Trump admitted to doing it first, then denied doing it and only admitted to bragging about doing it and getting away with it, so to believe the women are lying you must admit that Trump's boasts were him also lying. We know for sure that Trump was lying one way or the other, but we do not know for sure that any of the many many women are lying.

Zackly. They can't BOTH be lying. If the women are lying (and it would have to be all of them), then Rump is a liar about his own behavior with, to name two, Howard Stern and Billy Bush. And so is his daughter for confirming the whole walking in on teen and pre-teen girls in their changing room thing.

Or the other possibility is that Rump and Melania are not lying about all that, at least not always, which makes Rump a prevert who thinks he can do anything he wants because he's not only "entitled" to his own facts and "entitled" to have it both ways -- he's also "entitled" to play grabass on anyone within reach of those tiny tiny fingers.

Actually I honestly think when he felt up his daughter on stage at the convention on national television it wasn't anything consciously lecherous (after all there were more important things to attend to in that moment, since he's obsessed with cameras even more than with sex) --- he's just so used to doing it that it was an automatic hand reflex.

 

[bodecea]

And for an ironic twist ----

Check out the photo of the woman plaintiff in Palm Beach. Does she remind you of anybody?

Yeah, she reminds me of a typical leftwing money grubbing whore.

Of course she does....you've encountered enough to have a "typical"?

 

[Norman]

Further, where have the victims been all this time? Suddenly they just come up after the attack tape.

Is that ALSO the Bill Clinton "defense".....??? LOL

What do you mean? The Clinton controversy has been talked about repeatedly. The victims didn't just pop up, that's why Trump knew how to contact them.

 

[Carla_Danger]

After 30 years these women decide to speak out just weeks before the election? Give me a break. Dirty tricks from Crooked Hillary again. The public can see through this.

Do you think Bill Cosby is innocent? Just curious.

 

[Pogo]

Either that or they heard Sexual Predator Trump lie about it only being talk and not deeds

The timing of this is suspect and so is your integrity.

It is timed exactly with Sexual Predator Trump's lie!
Why is that suspicious? If Trump hadn't lied first they would have said nothing.

The lie is the accusation

We wish you best of luck proving a negative. Oh and we'll need video. You know, since you were there and all.

 

[Pogo]

Trump is a really creepy pervert. Can't believe he isn't in prison.



New York Daily News Calls Out Donald Trump's 'Perv Scandal'

If I were president, I'd set up a special prosecutor and he would be in JAIL!!

But that would make you a tin pot dictator who jails your political opponents....

Only an idiot would vote for you for saying that....

That is why you shouldn't be President.. I think we should apply this rule to all candidates equally...

Great synopsis of hitlery...a tin pot dictator.....

Amazing. This joke actually sailed over TWO heads.

​

I mean -- I didn't even watch the second debate, and I got the joke. Never underestimate the power of self-delusion....

 

[bripat9643]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

 

[bripat9643]

Either that or they heard Sexual Predator Trump lie about it only being talk and not deeds

The timing of this is suspect and so is your integrity.

It is timed exactly with Sexual Predator Trump's lie!
Why is that suspicious? If Trump hadn't lied first they would have said nothing.

The lie is the accusation

We wish you best of luck proving a negative. Oh and we'll need video. You know, since you were there and all.

It's already been prove to be a lie, douche bag.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

 

[bripat9643]

Suddenly the dems are caring whether someone is pervert or not. Where have they all been all this time?


Further, where have the victims been all this time? Suddenly they just come up after the attack tape.


I think Trump may have a case.

I wish I had a copy of all the excuses they used to defend Slick Willy during the Lewinski scandal