Rump to sue media for giving voice to women

[bripat9643]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

How is Trump liable for publication of those documents?

 

[nat4900]

The victims didn't just pop up, that's why Trump knew how to contact them.

PRECISELY......Trump even paid for some of those women to show up (well, Roger Stone did)...but these latest women against Trump are just popping up on their own AFTER the Trumpster stated that he "NEVER" abused or sexually assaulted any woman.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Are those the seats they were in?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

How is Trump liable for publication of those documents?

How is a newspaper liable for reporting what some women have said?

 

[nat4900]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Is that a picture of your family room with the port-a-potty?

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

How is Trump liable for publication of those documents?

He's an accomplice to their acquisition. With the Russians.

 

[ClosedCaption]

He's not suing anyone he still has "very bad" information on Cruz's wife remember?

 

[Care4all]

the times sent investigators out to find all of the people these women claimed they told about the event 20 to 30 years ago when it happened, and they verified they were told and what they were told....before the times printed the article...

 

[bodecea]

Either that or they heard Sexual Predator Trump lie about it only being talk and not deeds

The timing of this is suspect and so is your integrity.

It is timed exactly with Sexual Predator Trump's lie!
Why is that suspicious? If Trump hadn't lied first they would have said nothing.

The lie is the accusation

We wish you best of luck proving a negative. Oh and we'll need video. You know, since you were there and all.

It's already been prove to be a lie, douche bag.

You're gonna be here on Nov 8th and 9th, right? It's gonna be a fun time.

 

[jknowgood]

Donald Trump threatens to sue NYT amid blizzard of sexual assault allegations – live

BLIZZARD

"On an extraordinary day even by 2016 standards, a raft of allegations emerged about Trump’s behaviour towards women, teenage girls – and a 10-year-old."

"The latest Trump tape to be retrieved from the archives was unearthed by CBS news, which found a 1992 video of the businessman making inappropriate comments about a 10-year-old girl:"

In an Entertainment Tonight Christmas feature in 1992, Trump looked at a group of young girls and said he would be dating one of them in 10 years. At the time, Trump would have been 46 years old.

The video, released Wednesday evening, was shot at Trump Tower.

In the clip, Trump asks one of the girls if she’s “going up the escalator”. When the girl replies, “yeah”, Trump turns to the camera and says: “I am going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”

I think Trump should hire Hillary to represent him against these allegations. She would just destroy their lives and reputations. Then they would wish that Trump just sued them.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Is that a picture of your family room with the port-a-potty?

I think that's inside his tricked out Chevy van, aka the Shaggin' Wagon.

 

[bripat9643]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Are those the seats they were in?

Those are typical first class seats. That's where the boob lady says they were seated when this so-called assault occurred.

Never been in first class, have you?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Have you all forgotten that Trump has said he wants to CHANGE the libel/slander laws?

Precisely because this sort of suit can't go anywhere under current law..

 

[NYcarbineer]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Are those the seats they were in?

Those are typical first class seats. That's where the boob lady says they were seated when this so-called assault occurred.

Never been in first class, have you?

This took place 30 years ago or more. Want to see what those seats looked like?

 

[bripat9643]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

How is Trump liable for publication of those documents?

He's an accomplice to their acquisition. With the Russians.

ROFL! How is Trump an accomplice? You don't have the slightest evidence that the Russians are responsible. In fact, the American intelligence community is supplying the documents because they all despise Hillary and don't want her to become their boss.

 

[jknowgood]

Hill hasn't touch a mans balls in a decade.

I don't know, ole michelle Obama seems to have a pretty sizable package. I think ole Hillary might of gotten some dark meat.

 

[NYcarbineer]

He's not suing anyone he still has "very bad" information on Cruz's wife remember?

Not to mention that 'unbelievable' birther information his investigators found in Hawaii.

The man is mental.

 

[bripat9643]

The TWO most important factors one needs to prove when filing a defamation allegation......

First how those publications HARMED your reputation......AND, that they were false....

And you think either of those points is difficult to prove? Here, look at this picture and explain why the defendant's story that Trump raised the arm rest to fondle her breast is a lie:

Are those the seats they were in?

Those are typical first class seats. That's where the boob lady says they were seated when this so-called assault occurred.

Never been in first class, have you?

This took place 30 years ago or more. Want to see what those seats looked like?

Go ahead, show us a pick.

 

[Pogo]

No Pogo. If the statements they gave can be proven false, that the statements given caused harm, that the New York Times didn't adequately research the statement AND can prove that it was made with malice BINGO it's a winner.

You *STILL* don't get it.

All the necessary "research" was done. And that is, you interview the women, you get their stories, their pictures, you interview their corroborators ----- and that's IT.

Because the actor in these stories is not Donald Rump. The actor is the women. THEY are telling the stories. And the action in the stories is not the sexual assaults --- the action is the women telling their stories.

There's no dispute about that --- they DID say what they said. Well ...... THAT'S THE STORY.

Understand yet?

If I'm a newspaper and I publish "Rump eats babies" as a purported fact --- I can be sued for libel. The action is "eats".
If however I say "Ted Cruz SAYS Rump eats babies" --- and can prove he said that --- then I've reported a true fact. The action is "says".

That's exactly why the various stories -- and all stories like them ---- are worded like that. You can't report that someone DID something that you don't know to be true. You CAN report that someone else SAID they did something --- because that *is* true.

Read the wording . It's all in place. This is basic journalism 101.

In other words Rump is spewing a lot of hot air threatening something he can't do. He's trying to intimidate people to shut them up. Which is what he always does.

DUH.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Clinton suing the Trump campaign for using illegally obtained documents, from Wikileaks.

How is Trump liable for publication of those documents?

He's an accomplice to their acquisition. With the Russians.

ROFL! How is Trump an accomplice? You don't have the slightest evidence that the Russians are responsible. In fact, the American intelligence community is supplying the documents because they all despise Hillary and don't want her to become their boss.

Why would I need evidence? Say-so is ample proof according to you people.