Sarah Sanders Broke The Law When She Attacked The Restaurant That Refused To Serve Her

[Disir]

She didn't make it worse. Cut the shit.

You think her tweeting about it wasn't an attempt to bring it more attention, and to give Trump supporters something to be outraged (and potentially violent) about?

Maybe you just don't understand people all that well. I'm assuming Sarah does. She knows what mob mentality does to people, particularly in a hyper partisan and hostile climate as this. She only tweeted to try and damage these people. No other reason to do so. And while it's unlikely anyone will attack the owner, her employees, or the store ... one never really knows. People are capable of some crazy shit.

I understand people too well. And this is bullshit.

I forgot to mention that she also did it to please Trump, knowing how much he would love the distraction. But she knew she was potentially damaging this woman and her family for petty revenge over being slighted and asked to leave. No doubt about that.

Same as the restaurant owner knew what she was doing & getting herself & her business into, when she asked her to leave.

Small town restaurant owner vs. the biggest microphone in the United States?

Yeah, that's a fair fight.

Like I said, it was not very smart to ask her to leave, and not something I'd have done, but it's not a fight between equals.

Nah. Restaurant owner is not a victim. It isn't a fight. You got nothing but some Nancy Grace BS.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

She didn't make it worse. Cut the shit.

You think her tweeting about it wasn't an attempt to bring it more attention, and to give Trump supporters something to be outraged (and potentially violent) about?

Maybe you just don't understand people all that well. I'm assuming Sarah does. She knows what mob mentality does to people, particularly in a hyper partisan and hostile climate as this. She only tweeted to try and damage these people. No other reason to do so. And while it's unlikely anyone will attack the owner, her employees, or the store ... one never really knows. People are capable of some crazy shit.

I understand people too well. And this is bullshit.

I forgot to mention that she also did it to please Trump, knowing how much he would love the distraction. But she knew she was potentially damaging this woman and her family for petty revenge over being slighted and asked to leave. No doubt about that.

Same as the restaurant owner knew what she was doing & getting herself & her business into, when she asked her to leave.

Small town restaurant owner vs. the biggest microphone in the United States?

Yeah, that's a fair fight.

Like I said, it was not very smart to ask her to leave, and not something I'd have done, but it's not a fight between equals.

Doesn't really matter if it's 'equal' or not...…..the owner knew what she was getting into, period. As a business owner with employees, she should have insisted they do their jobs and serve the customers, whether they like or agree with them or not.

 

[Hellokitty]

Not seeing how Sanders broke any law with her comments on a government account since the owner specifically stated she was asked to leave because of her government position with TRUMP.

 

[Disir]

The guy that posted it on FB wanted to be a big shot.

/End.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Sarah Sanders, not only abused her official position to try to destroy the Red Hen restaurant. She also broke the law. These laws exist to keep people in prominent government positions from abusing their power. Since Donald Trump views himself as above the law, this culture has trickled down through his entire administration.

Sarah Sanders Broke The Law When She Attacked Restaurant That Kicked Her Out

omg. Where are these nutcases coming from???

SHhhhhhhhhh!

If it weren't for these nutcases I'd still be a Democrat.

 

[John Shaw]

You think her tweeting about it wasn't an attempt to bring it more attention, and to give Trump supporters something to be outraged (and potentially violent) about?

Maybe you just don't understand people all that well. I'm assuming Sarah does. She knows what mob mentality does to people, particularly in a hyper partisan and hostile climate as this. She only tweeted to try and damage these people. No other reason to do so. And while it's unlikely anyone will attack the owner, her employees, or the store ... one never really knows. People are capable of some crazy shit.

I understand people too well. And this is bullshit.

I forgot to mention that she also did it to please Trump, knowing how much he would love the distraction. But she knew she was potentially damaging this woman and her family for petty revenge over being slighted and asked to leave. No doubt about that.

Same as the restaurant owner knew what she was doing & getting herself & her business into, when she asked her to leave.

Small town restaurant owner vs. the biggest microphone in the United States?

Yeah, that's a fair fight.

Like I said, it was not very smart to ask her to leave, and not something I'd have done, but it's not a fight between equals.

To bad. The bigot should have just taken her order and served her dinner. You can't pick a fight and then whine like a little bitch when the other person doesn't take it lying down.

I don't think anyone did the right thing, to be honest. Not the owner, who should have just acted like a professional. Not Sarah Sanders, who is basically acting like Trump when he attacked that young college girl on Twitter. No one was in the right. Except Sarah could potentially be destroying lives with her pettiness, while the owner just put a damper on Sarah's night. It's overkill due to the difference in power.

 

[Fang]

Well this sure has taken an odd turn. Liberals were cheering the Red Hen on for being a bunch of bigots. NOW, they are whining because Sarah Huckabee Sanders used her 1st Amendment right and described what happened. The is TO FUCKING FUNNY!!! HAHAHA

Great job Sarah!!! You showed us all what real bigotry looks like in Lexington VA.

 

[TheOldSchool]

You think Sanders will send out a hit squad. I wouldn’t put it past her. The evil, feckless ****.

no

their asses will be black and blue from the bailiffs kicking them down the courthouse steps

Bailiffs, by law, are prohibited from doing that. Just like government officials are prohibited, by law, from using their office to harm businesses for personal or political reasons.

(School trolling again)

Just reiterating the OP’s point, which you haven’t made thenslightest effort to address.

Just reiterating the OP’s point,

The OP?

claims Sanders broke the law.

haven't seen which law she broke, if any, yet.

CFR 2635.702

Seeking to coerce a business by using her office to discourage patronage and putting public pressure on the business

 

[Tiggs]

The waiter at the restaurant apparently posted on his social media before Sarah Sanders posted. Sarah was replying to the fact already out there. Not that it matters, but even if we are to use the logic that Sarah used her official position to damage the restaurant, she didn't as an employee of the restaurant, (who represents the restaurant...officially or not) posted the information first.

 

[Aba Incieni]

I understand people too well. And this is bullshit.

I forgot to mention that she also did it to please Trump, knowing how much he would love the distraction. But she knew she was potentially damaging this woman and her family for petty revenge over being slighted and asked to leave. No doubt about that.

Same as the restaurant owner knew what she was doing & getting herself & her business into, when she asked her to leave.

Small town restaurant owner vs. the biggest microphone in the United States?

Yeah, that's a fair fight.

Like I said, it was not very smart to ask her to leave, and not something I'd have done, but it's not a fight between equals.

To bad. The bigot should have just taken her order and served her dinner. You can't pick a fight and then whine like a little bitch when the other person doesn't take it lying down.

I don't think anyone did the right thing, to be honest. Not the owner, who should have just acted like a professional. Not Sarah Sanders, who is basically acting like Trump when he attacked that young college girl on Twitter. No one was in the right. Except Sarah could potentially be destroying lives with her pettiness, while the owner just put a damper on Sarah's night. It's overkill due to the difference in power.

Since the owner instigated the squabble with full knowledge of who Sarah was, in fact admits that she refused to serve her BECAUSE of who she was, she is required to pay all court costs plus fine.

 

[John Shaw]

I love how rude and disrespectful the media is to Sarah and yet liberals get their panties in a wad when she actually snaps back and they yell "Disrespectful!!"

Well hell if they'd treat her with an ounce of respect they would get a pound in return. She's got far more patience than I do. I'd have told some of those fucktwats off a long time ago.

It's called being a professional. Maybe something you don't know much about?

Sarah isn't all that professional, but at least she keeps her cool better than Spicer did.

Professionalism doesn't require you to keep quiet about insults.

No it doesn't. Nor does it require things be "fair."

So you can only speak out against someone who throws you out of their restaurant for no reason if you're on their level? What if you make more money? What if you make less? What if your car is faster? What if their house is bigger but your boat is bigger?

If Sarah was a better person, she would have just stayed quiet about it.

But ... she didn't. So oh well, I guess.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

no

their asses will be black and blue from the bailiffs kicking them down the courthouse steps

Bailiffs, by law, are prohibited from doing that. Just like government officials are prohibited, by law, from using their office to harm businesses for personal or political reasons.

(School trolling again)

Just reiterating the OP’s point, which you haven’t made thenslightest effort to address.

Just reiterating the OP’s point,

The OP?

claims Sanders broke the law.

haven't seen which law she broke, if any, yet.

CFR 2635.702

Seeking to coerce a business by using her office to discourage patronage and putting public pressure on the business

She did not use her office.

 

[Fang]

I understand people too well. And this is bullshit.

I forgot to mention that she also did it to please Trump, knowing how much he would love the distraction. But she knew she was potentially damaging this woman and her family for petty revenge over being slighted and asked to leave. No doubt about that.

Same as the restaurant owner knew what she was doing & getting herself & her business into, when she asked her to leave.

Small town restaurant owner vs. the biggest microphone in the United States?

Yeah, that's a fair fight.

Like I said, it was not very smart to ask her to leave, and not something I'd have done, but it's not a fight between equals.

To bad. The bigot should have just taken her order and served her dinner. You can't pick a fight and then whine like a little bitch when the other person doesn't take it lying down.

I don't think anyone did the right thing, to be honest. Not the owner, who should have just acted like a professional. Not Sarah Sanders, who is basically acting like Trump when he attacked that young college girl on Twitter. No one was in the right. Except Sarah could potentially be destroying lives with her pettiness, while the owner just put a damper on Sarah's night. It's overkill due to the difference in power.

Her "pettiness"? Uh, she got thrown of a restaurant simply because she supports the President. That is a fact and no one is denying it. So she's not allowed to tell people what happened? The owners of the Red Hen are bigots. That's a fact now as well. Sarah Sanders has done nothing wrong but tell the truth. Hours ago Liberals were applauding her. Now they are whining. Hey, people don't like bigots.

 

[Marion Morrison]

She broke no laws. There is no law against telling the truth and no one was condemned.

Nah she used her office in an attempt to destroy the restaurant. There will be a lawsuit.

how did she do that?

Used her official account as press secretary to condemn a business for personal reasons. She’ll end up paying out a hefty sum.

She didn't condemn the business.

View attachment 200637

She singled them out knowing what would happen. They have received death threats because she abused her official government position and the power it comes with to destroy them. Easy win for the restaurant in a lawsuit.

Not so easy for that restaurant for repeat business. If ever I'm in the area, I'll pick someplace else.

They made their bed, and they'll lay in it.

 

[airplanemechanic]

no

their asses will be black and blue from the bailiffs kicking them down the courthouse steps

Bailiffs, by law, are prohibited from doing that. Just like government officials are prohibited, by law, from using their office to harm businesses for personal or political reasons.

(School trolling again)

Just reiterating the OP’s point, which you haven’t made thenslightest effort to address.

Just reiterating the OP’s point,

The OP?

claims Sanders broke the law.

haven't seen which law she broke, if any, yet.

CFR 2635.702

Seeking to coerce a business by using her office to discourage patronage and putting public pressure on the business

That law talks about using her public office for private gain. She isn't gaining anything by telling what happened.

But nice try!

 

[TheOldSchool]

Nah she used her office in an attempt to destroy the restaurant. There will be a lawsuit.

how did she do that?

Used her official account as press secretary to condemn a business for personal reasons. She’ll end up paying out a hefty sum.

She didn't condemn the business.

View attachment 200637

She singled them out knowing what would happen. They have received death threats because she abused her official government position and the power it comes with to destroy them. Easy win for the restaurant in a lawsuit.

Wow. That's really screwy. She did not go to the restaurant in any official capacity. She can single them out all she likes.

Not from her government office according to the law

 

[JimBowie1958]

How did she attack the restaurant? It seems to me that she related a factual encounter with a crazy hostile nut case democrat. Don't Trump employees have the same freedom of social media that crazy lefties enjoy?

Legally? No. With the position comes responsibility. Not that any of you nitwits would understand that.

Oh, shut the hell up, loser.

ROFLMAO, you Dimocrats have to be the stupidest pieces of shyte on the gawd damned globe.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

how did she do that?

Used her official account as press secretary to condemn a business for personal reasons. She’ll end up paying out a hefty sum.

She didn't condemn the business.

View attachment 200637

She singled them out knowing what would happen. They have received death threats because she abused her official government position and the power it comes with to destroy them. Easy win for the restaurant in a lawsuit.

Wow. That's really screwy. She did not go to the restaurant in any official capacity. She can single them out all she likes.

Not from her government office according to the law

You're redundantly in error.

 

[Aba Incieni]

The Left hates women.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The Left hates women.

Little kids too.