- Thread starter
- #541
"Obama Crushes Conspiracy: No Evidence that Russia Tampered with Votes in Election"
The Breirbart headline is not what the CIA most recently revealed about Russian attempts to swing the election to Trump.
Obama was talking about our voting machines being hack proof.
You are on the wrong story idiot.
As a time saving device, and a more succinct truth, you could shorten your avi to "fool."
1. "The C.I.A.’s conclusion does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence obtained since the election, several American officials, including some who had read the agency’s briefing, said on Sunday. Rather, it was an analysis of what many believe is overwhelming circumstantial evidence — evidence that others feel does not support firm judgments — that the Russians put a thumb on the scale for Mr. Trump, and got their desired outcome."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/11/us/politics/cia-judgment-intelligence-russia-hacking-evidence.html
" ....does not appear to be the product of specific new intelligence..."
What???? A guess????
" many believe"????
Now....there's a decision you can count on!
2. Sooo....the conclusion is based on four things:
a. a determined effort to shield the hurt feelings of Liberals like you.
b. Any alternative to Trump
c. a guess.
d. the assiduous use of the Magic 8-Ball
3. But....you can believe it....just like you can believe this:
"U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb" U.S. Agencies See No Move by Iran to Build a Bomb
Yup.....take it to the bank!!!!
Seriously consider my suggestion as to your avi.
Last edited: