Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[edthecynic]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Those weren't witnesses, they were pissed off bureaucrats.
"Trump didn't use my talking points on the call." "Waaaaaaahhhhh!!!"
"Trump recalled me from Ukraine and said I was a bad ambassador." "Waaaaahhhhhhh!!!!"
"Trump delayed the aid when we all said it was ok." Waaaaahhhhh!!!!
"Trump says he can do what he wants with foreign policy." "Waaahhhhh, oh wait a minute he can he's the President."

And a very presidential BULLSHIT to you.

 

[edthecynic]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Lies. Schiff wouldn't even let the witnesses answer some questions.

Yeah, like the name of the whistleblower, which again proves that you lying scum know you are lying when you claim the lying Republiscum couldn't question the witnesses.

 

[edthecynic]

In other words Schumer wants to cover-up the Democrat Ukraine Crimes

No crimes
No evidence
Complete exoneration

 

[edthecynic]

Both Schiff and Comey came out on National TV just the other night and admitted they lied

LIAR!

 

[edthecynic]

You can’t even get your gender right, nor figure out which bathroom to use so why should anyone listen to you?

Pure PROJECTION!

 

[Thunk]

Schumer... isn't he the guy that was patting Christine Blasey-Ford on the back, the woman who falsely accused Brett Kavanaugh of ungentlemanly things in high school or junior college 30 years earlier,

Yup...he has also been nicknamed "Cryin' Chuck" by our beloved president

 

[edthecynic]

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

 

[edthecynic]

As opposed to a kangaroo court?

The Senate is the kangaroo court, the House is a grand jury.

 

[edthecynic]

Not Just One crime, but he was booted from The White House and has his clearance downgraded for Leaking classified Information on calls between The President Thailand, Australia and Mexico.

Did Thailand, Australia, or Mexico provide any information on Hunter Biden that Ukraine and China missed, Moron

 

[edthecynic]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

That's right. It's not an investigative body.

No new witnesses, asshole.

So no witnesses are allowed at trials????

 

[The Original Tree]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

That's right. It's not an investigative body.

No new witnesses, asshole.

So no witnesses are allowed at trials????

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

The Senate only consider the failed Clown Show Adolph Schiffler put on when he denied 10 Witnesses the GOP requested and additionally denied access to two Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

 

[The Original Tree]

So Due Process is Something you oppose?

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

 

[Faun]

LO

Congress has the authority to issue subpoenas. They have since the early days of the Republic.

What part of the Constitution says that Congress has to go to a court?

What part of the Constitution says they have the authority to issue subpoenas? I'll be damned if I can find it.

.

The Supreme Court says they do

Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935)

Held in this case that the Senate had power to cite for contempt a witness charged with having permitted the removal and destruction of papers which he had been subpoenaed to produce.​

You should have kept reading. From your link:

63 App.D.C. 342 72 F.2d 560, reversed.

Supreme Court, D.C., affirmed.

Certiorari, 293 U.S. 543, to review the reversal of a judgment discharging a writ of habeas corpus by which the above-named respondent sought to gain his release from the custody of the above-named petitioner, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Senate.

.

LOL

Dumbfuck, that was appeals court's ruling that was reversed.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed; and that of the Supreme Court of the District should be affirmed.​

Bullshit commie, the district court was reversed by the court of appeals and the supremes affirmed the court of appeals decision. They said congress has no constitutional authority to impose punishment, that is for the article 3 courts, that's why the DOJ is responsible for pursuing congressional contempt citations.

.

LOL

Dumbfuck, I quoted the ruling. It's not my problem you're too dense to understand English

The judgment of the Court of Appeals should be reversed; and that of the Supreme Court of the District should be affirmed.​

"They said congress has no constitutional authority to impose punishment"

Dumbfuck, they said the opposite of what you hallucinate they said.

House Practice: A Guide to the Rules, Precedents and Procedures of the House - Chapter 17. Contempt

Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935). Although the use of such powers was supported by the Supreme Court in Jurney, neither House has used them since 1935.

The inherent power of Congress to find a recalcitrant witness in contempt has not been invoked by the House in recent years because of the time-consuming nature of the trial and because the jurisdiction of the House cannot extend beyond the end of a Congress. See Anderson v. Dunn, 19 U.S. 204 (1821). The first exercise of this power in the House occurred in 1812, when the House proceeded against a newspaper editor who declined to identify his source of information that had been disclosed from executive session. 3 Hinds Sec. 1666. Such powers had been exercised before the adoption of the Constitution by the Continental Congress as well as by England's House of Lords and House of Commons. Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 (1935). Although the use of such powers was supported by the Supreme Court in Jurney, neither House has used them since 1935.​

Do ya feel stupid yet??

 

[edthecynic]

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

Dumbass, the trial is in the Senate, in front of the jury!!!!

 

[edthecynic]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

 

[busybee01]

The Impeachment Trial is over, and The Dem Tards did not prove their case, neither could they list an actual crime that exists in US Code as an Article.

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

They did prove their case to the satisfaction of voters. They overwhelmingly agree Trump was wrong. A majority believe that he abused his power. A plurality agreed he impeded the investigation and committed bribery. A impeachable offense does not have to be a criminal statute.

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

I am a better judge than you as I did not vote for either Trump or Clinton.
The whistleblower was not needed and Schiff is not germane. You don't need a law degree to see that.

 

[busybee01]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

The trial is over. The Senate acts as the jury and only reviews the lack of evidence the dumbasses in The a House failed to produce.

And I cannot say this enough.

Fuck Chuck Schummer!

Fuck Moscow Mitch. The biggest crook in the Senate.

 

[busybee01]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

That's right. It's not an investigative body.

No new witnesses, asshole.

So no witnesses are allowed at trials????

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

The Senate only consider the failed Clown Show Adolph Schiffler put on when he denied 10 Witnesses the GOP requested and additionally denied access to two Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found them credible and was confirmed by other witnesses. The only 2 witnesses that were germane testified.

 

[busybee01]

So Due Process is Something you oppose?

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

Due process is a part of the criminal justice system. Not a impeachment trial.