colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
I’m sorry. But what is the difference of opinion here? What exactly is the executive branch’s argument?You guys are really worried about the truth coming out, aren’t you?They’d be questioned by the impeachment manager filling the role as prosecutor and I believe they’d be following the same rules as any witness in a trial that is managed by Roberts. A howling mob it most certainly is not.
It has far more to do with having to be under oath and the possibility that they might have to tell the truth.
That’s one hell of a scary thing for these thugs.
If the house case is too weak to proceed on it's own, perhaps the house should get their shit together before hand.
.
No, it's about due process. The house was in too big a hurry to afford the WH any due process, don't cry when they suffer the consequences of that haste and can't prove their case. The senate is not the place to continue the house investigation.
.
Due process? Baloney. Trump received more due process than he deserved.
Your opinion is irrelevant. One person subpoenaed by the house just went to the court to ask for guidance, the house withdrew the subpoena. The courts are there to resolve differences between the executive and legislative branches, the house refused to go to the courts to enforce their subpoenas. Now they want to impeach the president for their laziness. Give me a fucking break.
.