Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[White 6]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

I am a better judge than you as I did not vote for either Trump or Clinton.
The whistleblower was not needed and Schiff is not germane. You don't need a law degree to see that.

Guess this make our opinions about equal value, since I (also) didn't vote for Trump or Clinton. You are half right. Schiff is no longer germane because we already heard the witnesses, it is someone else's and the vote is tomorrow? I am glad the whistleblower blew the whistle. I only had two semesters and maybe a quarter of and kind of law.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

No they didn’t.

Yes they did, and YOU know it, just read the online transcripts and you can see EVERY lying Republiscum had the exact same time to question each witness as the Dems.

Like I said when the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

What Schumer wanted was the equivalent of the DA asking the Jury to go out and find more evidence to help make his case.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

I am a better judge than you as I did not vote for either Trump or Clinton.
The whistleblower was not needed and Schiff is not germane. You don't need a law degree to see that.

Yes, the whistleblower was needed along with the 6 other people the whistleblower had talked with.
Schiff is needed to answer for what he knew and when did he know about the whistleblower.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

Dumbass, the trial is in the Senate, in front of the jury!!!!

dumbass the senate is the JURY

 

[bripat9643]

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

Yeah, following the law is so inconvenient for Dims.

 

[bripat9643]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

That's right. It's not an investigative body.

No new witnesses, asshole.

So no witnesses are allowed at trials????

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

The Senate only consider the failed Clown Show Adolph Schiffler put on when he denied 10 Witnesses the GOP requested and additionally denied access to two Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found them credible and was confirmed by other witnesses. The only 2 witnesses that were germane testified.

Wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

So Due Process is Something you oppose?

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

Due process is a part of the criminal justice system. Not a impeachment trial.

Wrong, but thanks for admitting you are opposed to due process.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's not up to the Jury to look for more evidence

there aint no jury u f'n DUMBASS !

The Senate you dumbfuck is the jury.

theres no jury, senate or otherwise -

youre a f'n IDIOT.

The Senate becomes jury and judge, except in the case of presidential impeachment trials when the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official is removal from office.
U.S. Senate: Impeachment

She chooses to be wrong - don't fight it.

No, I wouldn't dare fight it leading these stupid idiots is fun.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You're trolling the thread, mate. Start a thread on the FBI if you want to discuss it so badly.
I think the American people deserve to hear a full trial of Trump. Not doing so is nakedly abandoning their constitutional duties.

They've already heard the best the prosecution has, so the only new evidence would be from the defense. Is that what you want, to see the charges be reduced to shreds and lying in the dust?

What makes you think that they can't call witnesses and subpoena documents that were obstructed from reaching the House?

They can, if the Republicans in charge allow them to.

Why wouldn't they allow testimony that explains how "perfect" the president acted?

THERES NOT A DRONE IN THE COLLECTIVE THAT KNOWS THEIR ASS FROM ALABAMA.

F EM

Go on with your bad self Ms. "the senate is not the Jury" lol

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It's a troll thread about a bullshit hoax. The corruption of the FBI is far more relevant in relation to the persecution of a sitting president.

.

You're trolling the thread, mate. Start a thread on the FBI if you want to discuss it so badly.
I think the American people deserve to hear a full trial of Trump. Not doing so is nakedly abandoning their constitutional duties.

They've already heard the best the prosecution has, so the only new evidence would be from the defense. Is that what you want, to see the charges be reduced to shreds and lying in the dust?

What makes you think that they can't call witnesses and subpoena documents that were obstructed from reaching the House?

They can, if the Republicans in charge allow them to.

Why wouldn't they allow testimony that explains how "perfect" the president acted?

So you believe it's ok for the DA to ask the jury to help find more evidence? lol
If democrats had a case they wouldn't be asking for more help from the senate. Anyone with any amount of common sense would see it.

 

[edthecynic]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

 

[edthecynic]

The DEM led House of Representatives holding their inquiry behind closed doors without a chance for their witnesses to be cross examined.

LIAR!
The Republiscum had EQUAL time to cross examine EVERY witness.
When the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

No they didn’t.

Yes they did, and YOU know it, just read the online transcripts and you can see EVERY lying Republiscum had the exact same time to question each witness as the Dems.

Like I said when the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

The Republiscum were in the same "closet" interviewing the same witnesses so it was more than fair.

 

[Mac-7]

And thats all trump wants to do

No phony FISA warrants or Deep State squealers lurking in the bushes around bidens mansion

Just an open investigation of the facts

Then Trump should have gone about it in a legal manner.

He is

Nope, he didn't. If was illegal for him to solicit a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

Thats kangaroo court injustice

Since when are we cool with politicians directing investigations against their rivals? That’s some real corrupt Soviet tactics right there.

So is adam schiff obtaining the phone records of republican politicians

Trump is the chief law enforcement officer and he can investigate wrongdoing by anyone

 

[easyt65]

There is currently a lot of u deniable evidence that Obama's DOJ & FBI abused the FISA Court, violated the Constitution, broke the law, & trampled American citizen's rights.

The FISA Court just issued an unprecedented rebuke of Rosenstein, Comey, the FBI, and others who engaged in this criminal behavior.

The FISA Court also made it clear that these criminals have endangered our national security as the FISA Court's existence is now in jeopardy thanks to anti-Trump traitors.

The Democrats, however, are continuing to ignore - even defend - this criminal behavior. Instead of addressing this national security damaging criminal.final behavior, the Democrats are pushing full-steam ahead with an unwarranted, crime-less, evidence-less, witness-less Impeachment they have called for since BEFORE THE PRESIDENT'S INAUGURATION.

The Democrats continue to declare through their actions, "F* the Country and our National Security - for the good of the Democratic Party we have to Impeach the President!"


.

 

[easyt65]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

The prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ dismissed the complaint because NO CRIME was proven and because there were NO WITNESSES.

 

[hadit]

Schumer Declared If the GOP Plays By Same Rules The House Dems Did, They're 'Engaged In A Cover Up'

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

Any of the witnesses that Nadler wouldn't allow to 'testify' while this mess was being heard in the House.

For example?

Who should be on that stand if not Mulveney who held up the aid on Trump's orders, or Juliani who was SMACK MIDDLE OF THE ENTIRE THING and who Trump referred EVERYONE to deal with including the President of Ukraine?

You want to get to the truth you ask the people involved, not put up sideshow about people who had nothing to do with real-time events this whole thing is about.

Sounds like something the democrats should have done.

You mean like this?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/CPRT-116-IG00-D024.pdf

MR. GOLDMAN: This is the deposition of Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.

Mr. Mulvaney was subpoenaed to appear at 9:00 a.m.
It is 9:07 a.m. He is not here.

And then followed up in court to force testimony, but they did not do that. This is what happens when you try to unseat a president this close to an election. He can use the clock.

 

[AntonToo]

Pure bullshit. Name just ONE relavant witness Democrats did not want to interview.

Republicans want to to have a testimony of everyone EXCEPT ANYONE DIRECTLY INVOLVED with the Ukrainian drug deal Trump is accused of.

Any of the witnesses that Nadler wouldn't allow to 'testify' while this mess was being heard in the House.

For example?

Who should be on that stand if not Mulveney who held up the aid on Trump's orders, or Juliani who was SMACK MIDDLE OF THE ENTIRE THING and who Trump referred EVERYONE to deal with including the President of Ukraine?

You want to get to the truth you ask the people involved, not put up sideshow about people who had nothing to do with real-time events this whole thing is about.

Sounds like something the democrats should have done.

You mean like this?

https://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/CPRT-116-IG00-D024.pdf

MR. GOLDMAN: This is the deposition of Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney.

Mr. Mulvaney was subpoenaed to appear at 9:00 a.m.
It is 9:07 a.m. He is not here.

And then followed up in court to force testimony, but they did not do that. This is what happens when you try to unseat a president this close to an election. He can use the clock.

Why hold up the process for a year (and place it smack middle of election) when the bare fact of this Obstruction of Congressional Investigation is itself an impeachment Article and evidence of guilt??

To do this is to basically give a roadmap to future President crooks - avoid Congressional oversight by running out the clock.

 

[Faun]

Then Trump should have gone about it in a legal manner.

He is

Nope, he didn't. If was illegal for him to solicit a foreign national to investigate a political rival.

Thats kangaroo court injustice

Since when are we cool with politicians directing investigations against their rivals? That’s some real corrupt Soviet tactics right there.

So is adam schiff obtaining the phone records of republican politicians

Trump is the chief law enforcement officer and he can investigate wrongdoing by anyone

You're ineducable, huh? No, Trump is not the chief law enforcement officer and while he can appoint or fire the Attorney General, he can't force them to investigate whomever he wants. He can ask them and they might but they are not obliged to do so.