The Scotus is made up of smart people who know which side their bread is buttered on.Nobody cares what a Canuck blabbers about the USA
And they even understand that their appointments could end up being less than lifetime!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Scotus is made up of smart people who know which side their bread is buttered on.Nobody cares what a Canuck blabbers about the USA
The Scotus is made up of smart people who know which side their bread is buttered on.
And they even understand that their appointments could end up being less than lifetime!
Federal supremacy is a fundamental aspect of our government. Roe limited the authority of federal government as well as state government.It assumed federal supremacy without ANY legislation in a situation where the Constitution forbade such actions.
It belongs with the States, unless the Constitution is amended to make that not the case.
When I'm willing to buy into your ideas I can always cause you to care hon.I said....
When I'm willing to buy into your ideas I can always cause you to care hon.
Watch how that works!
Federal supremacy is a fundamental aspect of our government. Roe limited the authority of federal government as well as state government.
Please tell me how limiting the authority of government is fascists.
Effects[edit]
In announcing the passage of the law and its anticipated results in a radio address the day after its passage, Interior Minister Frick declared: "A centuries old dream has been fulfilled. Germany is no longer a weak federal state, but a strong national, centralized country."[5]
- The parliaments of all the German states were abolished.
- The sovereignty of the states was transferred to the central Reich government, reducing the states to administrative units of the Reich.
- The Reich Governors came under the supervision of the Reich Ministry of the Interior, ensuring more centralized control.
- The conferring and regulation of citizenship became a matter for the central government. State citizenship was abolished as a separate concept and became subsumed into German national citizenship.[8]
- The Reichsrat, the upper body of Germany's parliament, whose members were appointed by the state governments to represent their interests in national legislation, had effectively been rendered impotent. The Reich government soon formally dissolved the Reichsrat on 14 February 1934, by passage of the "Law on the Abolition of the Reichsrat."[9]
We are in danger of removing presidents from positions of authority and transferring their power down to local courts in states.I think "limited immunity" for official actions is fine. For criminal acts of a personal nature, then "no".
The supreme court can adjudicate. We don't want state or local courts charging and trying ex-presidents.
Just like I said. Roe limited government intervention into private affairs.Roe decided States couldn't regulate something they were regulating, for the sole reason that the court wanted it to be so. No basis on the actual constitution at all.
It's up there with Dred Scott, Plessey, and Chevron as some of the worst crap a Supreme Court has ever foisted on the country.
Law on the Reconstruction of the Reich - Wikipedia
This is just for show. They will ultimately rule against him but not until after the election.US Supreme Court justices in Trump case lean toward some level of immunity
Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled sympathy on Thursday to the argument that presidents have some immunity against criminal charges for certain actions taken in office as it heard arguments over Donald Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for trying to undo his 2020 election...www.yahoo.com
SCOTUS began questioning each other as to if and how a President or former President could be held to account legally for anything
Here is a taste.
Sauer raised three hypothetical examples of past presidents being charged for officials actions taken as president.
He asked whether George W. Bush could be prosecuted for obstructing an official proceeding for allegedly lying to Congress to justify the Iraq war, or Barack Obama charged with murder for killing U.S. citizens abroad by drone strikes or Biden charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter country illegally, based on his border policies.
"The answer to all these questions is no," Sauer said.
But Trump can be prosecuted for paying money to a whore to keep their affair private or hold Presidential files Biden had as a Senator?
Hilarious!!
How about the USSC just sends the case back to the lower courts until after November?
They need more information...
It has vanished as it was destined to by the current court. Roe handed the right to murder humans to doctors and females. It can't happen now unless states approve it.Federal supremacy is a fundamental aspect of our government. Roe limited the authority of federal government as well as state government.
Please tell me how limiting the authority of government is fascists.
There are many private affairs that Democrats have eliminated. Such as expressions that are racist. He did not say it is fascist.Just like I said. Roe limited government intervention into private affairs.
And that's fascist because?
Dred Scott, Plessey limited individual rights. So did Dobbs.
They have more in common than they do with Roe.
So it's just naked election interference by conservative justices.This seems like the most practical solution.
It's incredibly vague, which is PERFECT for when you just want a tool to wield for partisan political purposes
Not really. Attempting to illegally prevent the duly elected executive from taking office and keeping the loser in power is a pretty good description for insurrection.Much like "iNsuRRecTiON"
1. If its justice you want they had 4-8 years to have the trials, why wait for 2024?That is their only goal, to make sure no trials are done by Nov. Can't have that.
1. If its justice you want they had 4-8 years to have the trials, why wait for 2024?
2. If the USSC doesn't want to do Banana Republic show trials I commend their thoroughness.