Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why don't you ever wonder why so many women fantasize about being raped?There it is!You are probably an unattractive woman not having luck with males and have the fantasy of being raped. That's why you are obsessed with raping. Hardcore feminist>>> bitter and ill willed person.How does our legal gay marriage ruin your right to rape women?..again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
defcon now tells us that in his world, women he deems to be unattractive fantasize about being raped.
I simply cannot understand why women don't flock to the RW in droves when they hear comments like yours.
I've wondered why women fantasize about being raped for years. Do you have an answer?
I'd like to think you are correct but I think Kennedy was doing that just to appear "neutral" at the argument. I'd bet serious money the homos win this one.Looks like SCOTUS ruling in favor of SSM isn't the lock the homos led everyone to believe. Roberts nailed it. Kennedy is all over the map, he's obviously conflicted.
Gay Marriage Arguments Divide Supreme Court Justices
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. suggested that Ms. Bonauto was asking the court to do something radical.
“You’re not seeking to join the institution,” he said. “You’re seeking to change what the institution is.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/29/us/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage.html
I think the most informed opinion we have access to on this matter was Scalia in his discent of the Windsor decision in 2013. He concluded that the court's opinion on the matter was 'beyond mistaking' and that the application of the logic of the Windsor decision against state gay marriage bans was 'inevitable'.
.
Good enough....I've marked it down.Again, I don't want to see you gone forever. 30 days...yes or no.I don't want you gone forever. 30 days......yes or no?Care to make a bet? How about one month off the boards to the loser.
Got a better idea....How about leaving the board forever? Want to play?
Nope. Put your money where your mouth is. This board means nothing to me. If I'm gone tomorrow, so be it. All this bickering and whooping and hollering doesn't change a damned thing. So - do you want to play? or are you not really sure what those assholes in robes - who (way back when) appointed themselves the "final arbiter" of all things Constitutional (against the wishes of the "government") going to do? My money is that they are going to say that it is not "Constitutional" and therefore - should be left up to the individual states to decide (as it always should have been)
Look, play or don't - your choice. But understand where I come from here. America is in its' death throes as a nation. It has fallen morally and it has fallen spiritually. We are doomed - just as my Bible predicts. BAD things are coming our way and we have done it to ourselves. We "reap what we sow". So no matter how this works out - it will make no difference whatsoever. The dye has been cast. the future is set and there isn't a damned thing you and I can do about it.
So, interested in trying to get this old man off this board forever?
Pity - but I'll play (it's a slow day on the ranch). 30 days it is. Enjoy your vacation from the faux outrage that exists on this forum....
No one is preventing gays from marrying each other Another fallacy popped...again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
Based on what? Gays want to be married to each other in order to destroy someone else's family? How, exactly, does that work?
TGhat is inconsistent with the USSC holding in McCullogh vs Maryland.Here is what I am referring to when I use the term, public accommodation laws:non sequiturs are usually considered non-responsive in legal venues--you need to be more relevant. We have a Commerce Clause. That merchant in Commerce is operating on a for-profit basis--thus, our Commerce Clause applies.
It's actually the INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE. I'll let you puzzle out how that defeats your entire argument.
The Commerce Clause provides a fundamental basis for public accommodation laws.
Actually, I do not believe that is true.
The Commerce Clause is the rational for the 1964 Civil Rights Act(and similar Federal laws), but would not apply to all of the state and local PA laws.
Those would be governed by their own State constitutions.
Within U.S. law, public accommodations are generally defined as entities, both public and private, that are used by the public. Examples include retail stores, rental establishments and service establishments, as well as educational institutions, recreational facilities and service centers. Private clubs and religious institutions were exempt. However, in 1984, the United States Supreme Court declared the previously all-male Junior Chamber International, a chamber of Commerce organization for persons between the ages of eighteen and thirty-six, to be a public accommodation, which compelled the admission of women into the ranks.[1]--Source: Public accommodations - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Commerce must have some fundamental law in the US with our written Constitution and supreme law of the land.
It cannot be a religious freedom issue if a Merchant in Commerce is operating on a for-profit basis instead of a not-for-the-profit-of-lucre basis.
Sounds like a symptom of low self-esteem.Why don't you ever wonder why so many women fantasize about being raped?There it is!You are probably an unattractive woman not having luck with males and have the fantasy of being raped. That's why you are obsessed with raping. Hardcore feminist>>> bitter and ill willed person.How does our legal gay marriage ruin your right to rape women?..again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the family
defcon now tells us that in his world, women he deems to be unattractive fantasize about being raped.
I simply cannot understand why women don't flock to the RW in droves when they hear comments like yours.
I've wondered why women fantasize about being raped for years. Do you have an answer?
Women s Rape Fantasies How Common What Do They Mean Psychology Today
Wrong. PLease show me the gay couples currently in custody for getting married.No one is preventing gays from marrying each other Another fallacy popped...again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
Based on what? Gays want to be married to each other in order to destroy someone else's family? How, exactly, does that work?
Whole states have attempted to prevent just that.
The difference between reasonable persons, who have all encompassing love toward fellow human beings and militant homosexuals is shown with above statement. I do have differences with others in political issues yet I have no hatred or animosity toward the persons. I sit down for lunch with my ideological opponents any time because it is civil and gives better knowledge of that person. Many times the acquaintance leads to toned down rhetoric.I happen to be here myself at the moment in the SJ area. 'You wanna meet up for lunch?I live in San Francisco-
LOL.....I am in San Jose at this moment- and I would not knowingly be in the same spot with you unless I was there to protect your potential victims from harm.
I can't think of any other reason to associate with someone who is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.
You wouldn't happen to work for the NFL would you?
He provided a link.....you, not so muchIndeed. These clowns base their ideology on the principle of "the squeaky wheel gets the grease" - pun intended. They scream and shout and wring their little hands to the point that most Americans are beginning to believe that they are 40-45% of the population - when, in fact, they are less than 1%.
Scream loud and long enough and society comes around to your way of thinking. And we fall.
Folks that support gay marriage are closer to 55%. And you don't need to be gay to support gay marriage.
Link?
Sure.
MOST AMERICANS DO NOT SUPPORT SAME-SEX MARRIAGE BY 5-1
Americans by a 5-1 margin are against same-sex marriage
See how easy that was? I can do that, too!
. But understand where I come from here. America is in its' death throes as a nation. It has fallen morally and it has fallen spiritually. We are doomed - just as my Bible predicts. BAD things are coming our way and we have done it to ourselves. We "reap what we sow". So no matter how this works out - it will make no difference whatsoever. The dye has been cast. the future is set and there isn't a damned thing you and I can do about it.I don't want you gone forever. 30 days......yes or no?Care to make a bet? How about one month off the boards to the loser.Actually marriage is a 'civil right"- the Supreme Court has overturned State marriage laws three times based upon that principle.
The question the Supreme Court is deciding is whether same gender couples are included in that civil right.
Ah, so it's NOT settled then, is it? Nor will it be when the decision comes down. The gays will NOT be happy.
Got a better idea....How about leaving the board forever? Want to play?
No one is preventing gays from marrying each other Another fallacy popped...again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
Based on what? Gays want to be married to each other in order to destroy someone else's family? How, exactly, does that work?
Alabama chief justice tells judges Refuse gay marriage licenses Online Athens
Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore sent a letter Sunday evening to probate judges ordering them to refuse to issue same-sex marriage licenses when the courts opened Monday morning. Moore wrote that the judges weren't bound by a federal judge's ruling Jan. 23 that the marriage ban was unconstitutional.
"Effective immediately, no probate judge of the state of Alabama nor any agent or employee of any Alabama probate judge shall issue or recognize a marriage license that is inconsistent with (the Alabama Constitution)," Moore wrote.
The difference between reasonable persons, who have all encompassing love toward fellow human beings and militant homosexuals is shown with above statement. I do have differences with others in political issues yet I have no hatred or animosity toward the persons. I sit down for lunch with my ideological opponents any time because it is civil and gives better knowledge of that person. Many times the acquaintance leads to toned down rhetoric.I happen to be here myself at the moment in the SJ area. 'You wanna meet up for lunch?I live in San Francisco-
LOL.....I am in San Jose at this moment- and I would not knowingly be in the same spot with you unless I was there to protect your potential victims from harm.
I can't think of any other reason to associate with someone who is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.
You wouldn't happen to work for the NFL would you?
However, anyone who is a thinking person is going to be hesitant to meet up with someone who has just expressed an opinion that the right to have sex equals the right to rape. That CLEARLY shows an inability to understand the Golden Rule....and is a prime indicator of a sociopath. Not a good idea to meet such a person...The difference between reasonable persons, who have all encompassing love toward fellow human beings and militant homosexuals is shown with above statement. I do have differences with others in political issues yet I have no hatred or animosity toward the persons. I sit down for lunch with my ideological opponents any time because it is civil and gives better knowledge of that person. Many times the acquaintance leads to toned down rhetoric.I happen to be here myself at the moment in the SJ area. 'You wanna meet up for lunch?I live in San Francisco-
LOL.....I am in San Jose at this moment- and I would not knowingly be in the same spot with you unless I was there to protect your potential victims from harm.
I can't think of any other reason to associate with someone who is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.
You wouldn't happen to work for the NFL would you?
Wrong. PLease show me the gay couples currently in custody for getting married.No one is preventing gays from marrying each other Another fallacy popped...again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
Based on what? Gays want to be married to each other in order to destroy someone else's family? How, exactly, does that work?
Whole states have attempted to prevent just that.
You arent very good at this, are you?
Except in the states where gay marriage is legal, show us the other states that have issued marriage licenses to gay couples. Mississippi? Alabama? Texas?Wrong. PLease show me the gay couples currently in custody for getting married.No one is preventing gays from marrying each other Another fallacy popped...again. Very lousy spin. You do not keep your homosexual activity in your bedroom any longer. You are out to destroy the foundation of a healthy society, namely the familyMore specifically- not just 'gay sex'- many of them really want the government telling all of us what the acceptable ways to have consensual sex are- i.e. the government policing our bedrooms.
Based on what? Gays want to be married to each other in order to destroy someone else's family? How, exactly, does that work?
Whole states have attempted to prevent just that.
You arent very good at this, are you?
. But understand where I come from here. America is in its' death throes as a nation. It has fallen morally and it has fallen spiritually. We are doomed - just as my Bible predicts. BAD things are coming our way and we have done it to ourselves. We "reap what we sow". So no matter how this works out - it will make no difference whatsoever. The dye has been cast. the future is set and there isn't a damned thing you and I can do about it.I don't want you gone forever. 30 days......yes or no?Care to make a bet? How about one month off the boards to the loser.Ah, so it's NOT settled then, is it? Nor will it be when the decision comes down. The gays will NOT be happy.
Got a better idea....How about leaving the board forever? Want to play?
So why oppose gay marriage if you are so certain that you are doomed?
FYI- people have been predicting the end of Civilization based upon the Bible for about 2,000 years- give or take a few hundred.
You might want to know what the heck the conversation is about AND what "freedom of speech" means before you post next time.Again, I don't want to see you gone forever. 30 days...yes or no.I don't want you gone forever. 30 days......yes or no?Care to make a bet? How about one month off the boards to the loser.
Got a better idea....How about leaving the board forever? Want to play?
Nope. Put your money where your mouth is. This board means nothing to me. If I'm gone tomorrow, so be it. All this bickering and whooping and hollering doesn't change a damned thing. So - do you want to play? or are you not really sure what those assholes in robes - who (way back when) appointed themselves the "final arbiter" of all things Constitutional (against the wishes of the "government") going to do? My money is that they are going to say that it is not "Constitutional" and therefore - should be left up to the individual states to decide (as it always should have been)
Look, play or don't - your choice. But understand where I come from here. America is in its' death throes as a nation. It has fallen morally and it has fallen spiritually. We are doomed - just as my Bible predicts. BAD things are coming our way and we have done it to ourselves. We "reap what we sow". So no matter how this works out - it will make no difference whatsoever. The dye has been cast. the future is set and there isn't a damned thing you and I can do about it.
So, interested in trying to get this old man off this board forever?
See how the far left wants to suppress and punish those that think differently from themselves..
Very telling post of the far left mentality..
More proof that they can not stand freedom of speech..
I don't know if you are really unable to see the point in that or you are just being obnoxious. You have unalienable right to preserve your life. You have no unalienable right to sex. What is it you cannot understand? If you are unable for slightly abstract thinking what the heck are you getting involved in a conversation for?Defcon4 Having sex is not a right. If it were, then rape as such would not be crime.
Our civil laws are not based, nor are they to be based, on your religion and your interpretation of your religion.. But understand where I come from here. America is in its' death throes as a nation. It has fallen morally and it has fallen spiritually. We are doomed - just as my Bible predicts. BAD things are coming our way and we have done it to ourselves. We "reap what we sow". So no matter how this works out - it will make no difference whatsoever. The dye has been cast. the future is set and there isn't a damned thing you and I can do about it.I don't want you gone forever. 30 days......yes or no?Care to make a bet? How about one month off the boards to the loser.
Got a better idea....How about leaving the board forever? Want to play?
So why oppose gay marriage if you are so certain that you are doomed?
FYI- people have been predicting the end of Civilization based upon the Bible for about 2,000 years- give or take a few hundred.
I oppose "gay marriage" because it goes against my religion. I understand that that is something so foreign to you that it makes you incapable of understanding it. I am not predicting ANYTHING. I am not a prophet. However, if you have a couple of hours, avail yourself of the Book of Revelations. What was predicted 2,000 years ago is coming to fruition. Don't blame the messenger if you don't like the outcome.
America was once the light of the world - now? We are the joke of the world. And something evil this way comes. And you can take that to the bank.
However, anyone who is a thinking person is going to be hesitant to meet up with someone who has just expressed an opinion that the right to have sex equals the right to rape. That CLEARLY shows an inability to understand the Golden Rule....and is a prime indicator of a sociopath. Not a good idea to meet such a person...The difference between reasonable persons, who have all encompassing love toward fellow human beings and militant homosexuals is shown with above statement. I do have differences with others in political issues yet I have no hatred or animosity toward the persons. I sit down for lunch with my ideological opponents any time because it is civil and gives better knowledge of that person. Many times the acquaintance leads to toned down rhetoric.I happen to be here myself at the moment in the SJ area. 'You wanna meet up for lunch?I live in San Francisco-
LOL.....I am in San Jose at this moment- and I would not knowingly be in the same spot with you unless I was there to protect your potential victims from harm.
I can't think of any other reason to associate with someone who is unable to differentiate between consensual sex and rape.
You wouldn't happen to work for the NFL would you?
