Self Defense with a firearm

[zeke]

Any of you bad ass gun lovers sent any money to the shooter in the Walmart murder? He will need your support for the legal fees he will have for the civil suit. That is, if the grand jury doesn't indict him for murder. Then he will need your money for defense attorneys.

The shooter called the other guy "out" while they argued at the service counter. He did that because of the gun in his pocket. The shooter instigated the fight.

Just the way it is and nothing you assholes say will change that fact. Hell the shooter instigated the entire confrontation by being an asshole at the service counter. All the shooter had to do was step back and tell the guy; I know, you're next in line.

The shooter may have felt like a big man when he started the fight and yea, the guy shot was the big loser, but just like with Zimmerman, this shooters life is fucked up forever because 1. he is an asshole and 2. he just had to have that gun in his pocket while he shopped at that very terrifying place; Walmart.

No way would this have happened if the shooter is not carrying his gun in his pocket. He would not have called out the much bigger man when the other man had done nothing but stand in line waiting for service. While the punk shooter acts like he is gonna cut in line.

You gun nuts are some fucked up people if you support this kind of bullshit shooting.

 

[Geaux4it]

Any of you bad ass gun lovers sent any money to the shooter in the Walmart murder? He will need your support for the legal fees he will have for the civil suit. That is, if the grand jury doesn't indict him for murder. Then he will need your money for defense attorneys.

The shooter called the other guy "out" while they argued at the service counter. He did that because of the gun in his pocket. The shooter instigated the fight.

Just the way it is and nothing you assholes say will change that fact. Hell the shooter instigated the entire confrontation by being an asshole at the service counter. All the shooter had to do was step back and tell the guy; I know, you're next in line.

The shooter may have felt like a big man when he started the fight and yea, the guy shot was the big loser, but just like with Zimmerman, this shooters life is fucked up forever because 1. he is an asshole and 2. he just had to have that gun in his pocket while he shopped at that very terrifying place; Walmart.

No way would this have happened if the shooter is not carrying his gun in his pocket. He would not have called out the much bigger man when the other man had done nothing but stand in line waiting for service. While the punk shooter acts like he is gonna cut in line.

You gun nuts are some fucked up people if you support this kind of bullshit shooting.

Sticks and stones...

-Geaux

 

[KNB]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

 

[Geaux4it]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

Wrong.. We are taught 2 shots tap/tap center mass. If you are forced to draw your weapon it is in response to potential threat that could cause grave injury. At that point, it is in the best interest of victim survival to shoot to kill, not injure.

-Geaux

 

[KNB]

Obviously you aren't taught much on "threat assessment" because you would know that most fights don't need to end in death, or even a gun being pulled. This Wal-Mart case was one of those situations that didn't require a gun, but a pussy had one so he used it.

By your logic, every kid should have guns in school so they can kill the bullies. That makes sense to you, right? Because it's "self-defense", right?

 

[Geaux4it]

Obviously you aren't taught much on "threat assessment" because you would know that most fights don't need to end in death, or even a gun being pulled. This Wal-Mart case was one of those situations that didn't require a gun, but a pussy had one so he used it.

By your logic, every kid should have guns in school so they can kill the bullies. That makes sense to you, right? Because it's "self-defense", right?

What I know is I'm law abiding. What needs to be 'known' here is on the criminal. They need to know there are severe consequences for assault.

Society as a whole is safer when criminals don't know who's armed.

It's against the law for children to have guns so your scenario is moot.

-Geaux

 

[KNB]

You're not law abiding if you kill someone who threw a punch at you. At that point, you're just a scared little bitch with a gun who killed someone because you're a scared little bitch. This fistfight in a supermarket check-out line was about as serious as a schoolyard fight, and no one should be shot in either situation.

Keep trying to justify murder. It makes me feel safe knowing that intelligent people like you are the frontline of defense against tyranny.

 

[Geaux4it]

You're not law abiding if you kill someone who threw a punch at you. At that point, you're just a scared little bitch with a gun who killed someone because you're a scared little bitch. This fistfight in a supermarket check-out line was about as serious as a schoolyard fight, and no one should be shot in either situation.

Keep trying to justify murder. It makes me feel safe knowing that intelligent people like you are the frontline of defense against tyranny.

No, I justify killing people who attack law abiding citizens. Criminals need to know there are limits and potential consequences.

-Geaux

 

[Lonestar_logic]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

You are more likely to kill someone by shooting them in the leg than by shooting them in the torso.

Can you say femoral artery?

If you must use your firearm, then aim for center mass and keep firing until the threat is gone.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You're not law abiding if you kill someone who threw a punch at you. At that point, you're just a scared little bitch with a gun who killed someone because you're a scared little bitch. This fistfight in a supermarket check-out line was about as serious as a schoolyard fight, and no one should be shot in either situation.

Keep trying to justify murder. It makes me feel safe knowing that intelligent people like you are the frontline of defense against tyranny.

Four words. Trayvon Martin justifiable homicide.

FTR if anyone comes at me in a threatening manner, I will shoot them.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

It would appear from the recent shooting at a Walmart that the left is opposed to self defense as well. A man was physically attacked and defended himself and people like Luddy call him a criminal.

So all the claims in the past about self defense not happening isn't the point, what they mean is no one should ever shoot anyone even in self defense.

Then we have the useful idiots that remind us some lefties own firearms. usually with the claim that because of that no one is trying to take them away.

How many examples do we need of high profile democrats demanding just that? A ban on firearms and a confiscation of privately owned firearms?

Add to that the refusal of some to acknowledge the Supreme Court ruled the 2nd is an INDIVIDUAL right not dependent on belonging to a militia. And further that it applies to the States.

If you could magically make all firearms in private hands disappear, pushing for stricter gun control would be a fine idea. But since anyone who wants a firearm already has one, doing gun control LONG after the fact is pointless. All that does it put the advantage on criminals. Law-abidding citizens will abide by the laws, but the ones you're worried about that you're passing new legislation could give a shit what's legal or not.

A better solution to gun violence is punishing people commiting gun crimes. Make any crime involving the use of a firearm a death sentence. That'll fix it. Not like anyone we care about is going to miss violent felons if they all disappeared from society.

 

[KNB]

You're not law abiding if you kill someone who threw a punch at you. At that point, you're just a scared little bitch with a gun who killed someone because you're a scared little bitch. This fistfight in a supermarket check-out line was about as serious as a schoolyard fight, and no one should be shot in either situation.

Keep trying to justify murder. It makes me feel safe knowing that intelligent people like you are the frontline of defense against tyranny.

No, I justify killing people who attack law abiding citizens. Criminals need to know there are limits and potential consequences.

-Geaux

A death sentence for aggravated assault? That sounds fascinatingly atrocious. A real utopia, right?

 

[Geaux4it]

You're not law abiding if you kill someone who threw a punch at you. At that point, you're just a scared little bitch with a gun who killed someone because you're a scared little bitch. This fistfight in a supermarket check-out line was about as serious as a schoolyard fight, and no one should be shot in either situation.

Keep trying to justify murder. It makes me feel safe knowing that intelligent people like you are the frontline of defense against tyranny.

No, I justify killing people who attack law abiding citizens. Criminals need to know there are limits and potential consequences.

-Geaux

A death sentence for aggravated assault? That sounds fascinatingly atrocious. A real utopia, right?

There should be no assault. The criminal needs to conduct some critical thinking before making the decision to attack. Could cost him his life.

Once we get constitutional carry nationwide look for a further reduction in Martin/Walmart type thugs

-Geaux

 

[KNB]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

You are more likely to kill someone by shooting them in the leg than by shooting them in the torso.

Can you say femoral artery?

If you must use your firearm, then aim for center mass and keep firing until the threat is gone.

Can you say, "Bitch with a gun"?

Your key words in that last sentence were, "If you must use your firearm..." In most cases, you don't need to use your firearm. This pussy at Wal-Mart, and that bitch George Zimmerman, were just scared little bitches who had guns.

 

[KNB]

No, I justify killing people who attack law abiding citizens. Criminals need to know there are limits and potential consequences.

-Geaux

A death sentence for aggravated assault? That sounds fascinatingly atrocious. A real utopia, right?

There should be no assault. The criminal needs to conduct some critical thinking before making the decision to attack. Could cost him his life.

Once we get constitutional carry nationwide look for a further reduction in Martin/Walmart type thugs

-Geaux

Assault does not warrant a death penalty, you fucking coward.

 

[Geaux4it]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

You are more likely to kill someone by shooting them in the leg than by shooting them in the torso.

Can you say femoral artery?

If you must use your firearm, then aim for center mass and keep firing until the threat is gone.

Can you say, "Bitch with a gun"?

Your key words in that last sentence were, "If you must use your firearm..." In most cases, you don't need to use your firearm. This pussy at Wal-Mart, and that bitch George Zimmerman, were just scared little bitches who had guns.

Ding...ding...ding...

You got it.....

Afraid that they could be killed while under assault.

Justifiable homicide.

-Geaux

 

[Geaux4it]

A death sentence for aggravated assault? That sounds fascinatingly atrocious. A real utopia, right?

There should be no assault. The criminal needs to conduct some critical thinking before making the decision to attack. Could cost him his life.

Once we get constitutional carry nationwide look for a further reduction in Martin/Walmart type thugs

-Geaux

Assault does not warrant a death penalty, you fucking coward.

Law abiding citizens do not warrant the assault or are expected to endure it. The firearm is allowed to cease said attack.

Good times

-Geaux

 

[Lonestar_logic]

"Self-defense" might involve popping your attacker in the leg if they actually pose a real threat. Fight's over if your attacker can't walk. Even a quick jab to your assailant's throat with the handle will end most fights. Killing another person because they "threw a punch" is the act of a coward.

You are more likely to kill someone by shooting them in the leg than by shooting them in the torso.

Can you say femoral artery?

If you must use your firearm, then aim for center mass and keep firing until the threat is gone.

Can you say, "Bitch with a gun"?

Your key words in that last sentence were, "If you must use your firearm..." In most cases, you don't need to use your firearm. This pussy at Wal-Mart, and that bitch George Zimmerman, were just scared little bitches who had guns.

You are not the authority on what someone else may feel is a threat or how great that fear is.

It's easy to arm chair quarterback these types of events but quite another thing when you're actually involved.

From my experience, you're the kind of guy that talks big but who is really a coward.

 

[jon_berzerk]

You are more likely to kill someone by shooting them in the leg than by shooting them in the torso.

Can you say femoral artery?

If you must use your firearm, then aim for center mass and keep firing until the threat is gone.

Can you say, "Bitch with a gun"?

Your key words in that last sentence were, "If you must use your firearm..." In most cases, you don't need to use your firearm. This pussy at Wal-Mart, and that bitch George Zimmerman, were just scared little bitches who had guns.

Ding...ding...ding...

You got it.....

Afraid that they could be killed while under assault.

Justifiable homicide.

-Geaux

the exact standard needed for a justifiable homicide

 

[Iceweasel]

Assault does not warrant a death penalty, you fucking coward.

No one has ever been killed by an assault?