HikerGuy83
Diamond Member
- Dec 26, 2021
- 7,392
- 5,367
I am sure you have some examples. Let's see them.Dumbass arguments that are opposed to scientific realities.
The scientific method has it's name for a reason.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am sure you have some examples. Let's see them.Dumbass arguments that are opposed to scientific realities.
Values in such as respecting what was established and now crashing it with a whole new set of conditions.Values such as men pretending to be women because those men can’t compete against other men?
There is no "solution" to the physical difference between a man and a woman.There are values more important than winning a bike race. Americans must come together to start working to find a solution to these differences.
Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females. We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.Go ahead and talk science. Let's see what you've got.
Is that one where you wearing lipstick, eyeshadow and high heels makes you a woman?Is that one where women were made from the rib of a man?![]()
Is that your argument? It certainly isn't mine. Do you have anything other than a strawman for an argument Dumbass?Is that one where you wearing lipstick and eyeshadow and high heels makes you a woman?
Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.Is that your argument? It certainly isn't mine. Do you have anything other than a strawman for an argument Dumbass?![]()
Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.
Nope. They consist of relaying science to you and then laughing because all of you sad fucks are too pussy to rock with your Bibles. Jesus isn't good enough for you that you want to claim science?Your argument consists of name-calling. Your silly tirades are laughable.
Nope. They consist of relaying science to you and then laughing because all of you sad fucks are too pussy to rock with your Bibles. Jesus isn't good enough for you that you want to claim science?![]()
![]()
We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.
The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females. We have intersexed people who have mixed sexual biology and trans people who have mixed gender identities.
See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.You are relaying only your own fears and ignorance. If you enjoy playing dress up in women’s clothes, you have a sexual disorder. Seek help.
Donald already showed that biology is more complex than just males and females.
I refuse to do the emoticons, but thank you in person!See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.
Wearing a seatbelt or accepting airbags or emission controls is analogous to men in women’s sports.The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.
It's not so different from wearing a fkng seatbelt or accepting air bags or emissions control.
All he did was blur the lines. It, in no way justifies the current approach. And the results would imply the current approacch is incorrect.See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.
It certainly can. Is that all you got on that?Interesexed can describe a lot of people.
A case to who? It's private organization that doesn't give a fuck how you feel. See all the other women on the podium? All were in celebration.Some might have a case for competing against women, but not all.
Except it ain't though. One race isn't data you Clown. Go find some that supports you and come back.That's pretty straightforwad. That trangender men come in and dominate in a womans competition is pretty compelling "Scientific" data.
Your own article says there is no dividing line. What is needed is not change an acceptance of men in womens sports. What is needed is a place for trangender men in transgener mens sports. I realize that (for some reason) offends your sensibilities, but your article makes it plain that this is a better route.The dividing line on opinions is not a line that exclusively divides liberals and conservatives. That's the foot in the door that can lead to change and acceptance.
See. Your attempt at argument is nothing more than bad analogies and something you heard about “intersex”, which you have an odd fascination with but no knowledge of.See. All your arguments rely on make believe and cosplay about me and nothing about the science of the intersex, which Donald linked for you.