Senate Dems cannot define a woman

Actually, it doesn't..on the whole. Those policies are supposed to include everyone regardless of what they identify as.
It is a culture war cudgel. Designed to divide and separate into camps.

Division pimping at its highest art form. :)
Except it does like Title 9 for example. :)
 
Of course it is not meaningless, it just means something other than sex.

Sex is what we should go by for things like sports and such. It was always the battle of the sexes, not the battle of the genders.
Explain in detail the difference between gender and sex….using science, And then tell us exactly how many genders there are.
 
Explain in detail the difference between gender and sex….using science, And then tell us exactly how many genders there are.
He/she/it can’t…..he/she/it just says some whackos decided to claim there is a distinction to be made between the two so therefore there is.
 
archive.org

The concise Oxford dictionary of current English : Fowler, H. W. (Henry Watson), 1858-1933 : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

x, [2], 1064 p. 19 cm
archive.org

ge'nder • (j-), n. Grammatical classification (or one of the two, or three, classes) of objects roughly corresponding to the two sexes & sex- lessness (masculine, feminine, & neuter; see also common *, epicene), (of nouns & pro- nouns) property of belonging to such class, (of adjj.) appropriate form for accompanying a noun of any such class; (joe) sex. Hence ge'ndePLESS a. [f. OF gen(d)re f. L genus]


Yes, a dictionary from 1911. Have you ever seen a dictionary before?
yeah….gender refers to the sexes…:did you read what you posted?
 
Gender does correspond sex. Which means that gender and sex are two different things.

Do I need to post the definition of correspond?



You have just been proven wrong and yet you keep lying.

Sad, very sad.
hahahaha yeah maybe you should
 
Explain in detail the difference between gender and sex….using science

That is easy.

Sex is a term of science, gender is a literary term. Gender has nothing to do with science at all, you will not find anything about gender in a science book.
 
yeah….gender refers to the sexes…:did you read what you posted?

yes I did, it said that gender roughly corresponds to the sexes....which means that gender and sex is not the same fucking thing.
 
EEOC laws are based upon sex, not gender.

There are millions of families in America with LGBTQ children. There are tens of millions of families who n America with straight children who are friends with, or openly accept their LGBTQ peers.

If shit for brains conservative America think this is a winning issue for them, just wait a bit longer.
 
Based on sex, not gender
Right or wrong, most use the two words sex and gender interchangeably. Thus we have males that identify as females using women's restrooms, using women's locker rooms and playing on women's sports teams with the blessing of the woke crowd.
 
how about we try this…what genders exist? what sexes exist?

In literature there are 3 genders...masculine, feminine, neuter.

In the societal construct of gender there are lots of genders.

In science there are 2 sexes male and female. There is also intersex which some people classify as a third sex but which is really a combination of both, for example someone born with both ovarian and testicular tissues.
 
So someone missing a leg isnt a human being.
You can define a human being that way if you wish, of course.

Plato's definition was challenged far more effectively long ago when when Diogenes plucked a chicken and proclaimed, "Behold! I've brought you a man."

Regardless, as we know, there are individuals whose anatomical structure is not congruent with their gender identity*.
Authoritarian autocrats trying to dictate to them otherwise does not alter that reality.

*Gender identity refers to “one’s sense of oneself as male, female, or transgender.” American Psychological Association.



Screen Shot 2021-08-29 at 8.02.12 PM.png

Gist drop yer drawers, and
Ahl
t
ell yuh what yuh iz!
 
You can define a human being that way if you wish, of course.

Plato's definition was challenged far more effectively long ago when when Diogenes plucked a chicken and proclaimed, "Behold! I've brought you a man."

Regardless, as we know, there are individuals whose anatomical structure is not congruent with their gender identity*.
Authoritarian autocrats trying to dictate to them otherwise does not alter that reality.

*Gender identity refers to “one’s sense of oneself as male, female, or transgender.” American Psychological Association.



View attachment 626834
Gist drop yer drawers, and
Ahl
t
ell yuh what yuh iz!

No, you cant.

Your first definition was good. But just because a human is not literally a biped doesnt make them not human.

Just because a human born female likes to work on cars doesnt make them a man.

You know its bullshit. Why buy into it?
 
No, you cant.

Your first definition was good. But just because a human is not literally a biped doesnt make them not human.

Just because a human born female likes to work on cars doesnt make them a man.

You know its bullshit. Why buy into it?
If you take your marching orders from hyper-partisan ideologues with no expertise in human psychology, that is your prerogative. Nevertheless, authoritarians' attempts to dictate to everyone in the matter is futile.

It's as if a dictator, out of mindless prejudice, were to mandate that everyone must be right-handed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top