Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You do know your side has no say in what the Senate does, right? Your pigs got their way in the House because that's what the Constitution says. Well, that's what happening now. You pricks screamed that you had OVERWHELMING evidence to impeach him. Well now you get to watch. The Constitution delegates the power of trying what the House voted. Stop whining whenever the rules don't let you get your way.
And if the Senate doesn't allow the evidence to be presented? When it comes to actual voting, Dems have the higher ground. They will be voting on the evidence. The Repugs are voting on party lines. Simple really.
It's a sham. But interesting to watch anyway.
This is why the US is the laughing stock of the world.
And to think there is a thread here spouting how it is supposed to be the greatest country in the world. Laughable.
The Dems made their own bed, they can lie in it. The purpose of the Senate is to judge the case the Dems put together. THEY screamed it was overwhelming evidence so there is no need to add to what they did. Sorry, the Dems want their way in every area. Tough shit.
Are you STILL stuck on the lie that Clinton was Impeached because of an affair, instead of him being found guilty of Contempt of Court by attempting to unethically con a judge and jury through misleading testimony, for which he was stripped of his license to practice law?!BTW, blowjobs and treason are two different things.
You do realize there is a difference between Impeachment based on baseless accusations and ones supported by actual evidence, right?
If not, you need to ACTUALLY watch the House Coup Managers humiliate themselves by admitting they voted to Impeach the President without having any evidence.
The Dems made their own bed, they can lie in it. The purpose of the Senate is to judge the case the Dems put together. THEY screamed it was overwhelming evidence so there is no need to add to what they did. Sorry, the Dems want their way in every area. Tough shit.
I don't know what you are watching, but it isn't the live Senate hearing on Impeachment.
The Democrats have openly declared they are not prepared to present the case / justification for their vote to Impeach the President, that they are not prepared to explain why they voted to Impeach the President in the House because they DON'T HAVE THE EVIDENCE TO DO SO.
They are literally BEGGING the Senate to allow them to continue to investigate and try to find evidence that will provide the justification for them having ALREADY voted to Impeach the President...
.
News flash, snowflake:53 Republicans voted to support McConnell's effort to suppress evidence. This is the first win of many battles goes & for The President.
We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.
If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will
come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.
AMERICANS ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
WHEN the House traitors drag their sorry asses back to the House after the Senate dismisses their exposed political coup attempt, Trump will be CONFIRMED 'Innocent'.
Don't blame the President for the Democrats putting on display their criminal incompetence & treason, showing up to the Senate - AFTER voting for Impeachment - and declaring they can't present their case because they don't have the evidence to Justify Impeaching the President.
If the Founding Fathers were still alive - after this display put on by the House Impeachment managers, the only way they would leave the Senate would be in handcuffs.
An acquittal does not mean the Defendant is innocent. In you head was O.J. Simpson innocent when he was found not guilty?
The Dems made their own bed, they can lie in it. The purpose of the Senate is to judge the case the Dems put together. THEY screamed it was overwhelming evidence so there is no need to add to what they did. Sorry, the Dems want their way in every area. Tough shit.
And as long as they are able to present that evidence, no problems.
When a prosecutor stands up at the start of a trial and admits he does not even have enough evidence to indict let alone attempt to prosecute, his follow-on attempt to claim just because his case will probably thrown out as a result does not mean the individual on trial us 'innocent' is like Madonna attempting to claim today that she is a 'virgin'...An acquittal does not mean the Defendant is innocent. In you head was O.J. Simpson innocent when he was found not guilty?
....which is exactly what you are trying to do right now...
Acquittal means Exoneration.
Suck it Putin Dingleberry Sniffer.
News flash, snowflake:53 Republicans voted to support McConnell's effort to suppress evidence. This is the first win of many battles goes & for The President.
We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.
If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will
come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.
AMERICANS ARE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY!
WHEN the House traitors drag their sorry asses back to the House after the Senate dismisses their exposed political coup attempt, Trump will be CONFIRMED 'Innocent'.
Don't blame the President for the Democrats putting on display their criminal incompetence & treason, showing up to the Senate - AFTER voting for Impeachment - and declaring they can't present their case because they don't have the evidence to Justify Impeaching the President.
If the Founding Fathers were still alive - after this display put on by the House Impeachment managers, the only way they would leave the Senate would be in handcuffs.
An acquittal does not mean the Defendant is innocent. In you head was O.J. Simpson innocent when he was found not guilty?
Hello everyone. I have some questions. I seem to be in the opposite view point as most people here. I hope that whoever responds to me can do so with the intent to educate and show me where I am wrong instead of putting me down. I really do want to see the other sides point of view but mostly I see is name calling...
First and foremost, I was 3 years old during the Clinton trial so none of that is in my memory bank. This past election was the first election I could vote in so I had no say in the last president(s). That being said, I don’t find the use of past presidents mistakes or downfalls as a valid excuse.
This is the first presidency I am a part of, and also the first impeachment. I really do not understand why there is an argument of witnesses. I would really appreciate someone explaining to me (respectfully please) why there is even a problem with that. What trial does not allow witnesses? It seems that every effort to look into whether there was a crime was blocked. What is the difference between that and a cover up? How would they act differently if they truly were guilty? Again, I am looking for a real answer and not an insult.
Thank you for your time
So you don’t have evidence?? Wtf are we doing here?53 Republicans voted to support McConnell's effort to suppress evidence. This is the first win of many battles goes & for The President.
We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.
If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will
come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.
Cryin' Chucky Bitchslapping #3 handed down.
Suck it, Chucky...
