Senate Impeachment Trial Thread.

[hadit]

Trump refuses to let witnesses testify -

Trumpdrones start demanding evidence only a witness can provide

senate republicans become the pulling guard in a trap play

evidence - yeah, dats it, EVIDENCE

DEMS AINT GOT NO DAMN EVIDENCE.

You scream at the Republicans for not going after the "evidence", yet have no condemnation for the democrats who didn't go after it either when they had the power. Interesting, that.

By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.


say it aint so Shane, say it aint so...........

And the democrats failed to go after the "evidence" you say exists, bottom line. Now they, and you, want the Senate to do their job for them, but somehow the democrats are blameless. They had the power and the means to compel testimony but did not.

how could the house gain evidence after Trump blocked witnesses -

cracker jack boxes

pretty damn dumb aint ya ..............

Aww, did the mean old Trump render the poor helpless democrats toothless by telling them "no"? Who knew it was that easy?

Seriously, think about how dumb that was.

 

[ChrisL]

Democrats need to start working for the people and this country, and put their animosity aside.

Really, it's been more than 3 years, and they don't really have anything!

 

[easyt65]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

 

[Nostra]

By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.

Need some cheese to go with that whine?

Need a tissue to go with that weepy rant?

Your misplaced anger is touching, yet it should be directed at the House Impeachment / Coup Managers and the architect of this self-imploding disaster, Speaker Pelosi, who allowed Impeachment to go forward despite not meeting her own standards to do so: 1)Overwhelming Evidence - they have none, and 2) Bipartisanship - not only are they responsible for the 1st Partisan Impeachment in US history, one of their number switched parties over their hate-driven trampling of the Constitution.

The House literally voted to Impeach the President of the United States based on a case they presented to the entire House...and now they declare they are unable ... or unwilling ... to present that case, their justification for Impeaching the President of the United States, to the US Senate...because they do not have enough evidence t do so. That same case was 'good enough' for the House Democrats to decide to Impeach the President. So why do they refuse to present THAT CASE to the Senate?

Refusing to do so is an admission that their case, on which they based their justification for Impeaching the US President, is truly the weakest in US history and not at all enough to warrant the Impeachment of the President. If it were, they would present it to the Senate.

Again, if you are pissed that the House Coup Managers can not / will not present the same case on which they based their decision to Impeach to the US Senate, don't blame anyone but the House and these proven criminal clowns who have declared both the President and US Senate is on trial, that if the US Senate does not comply with the demands made by the Trump-hating criminal House Democrats then the President and Senate are 'guilty'.

Additionally, I would like to say I am 'sorry' for your partisan lack of the ability to equally accept 'Executive privilege' when a Republican President chooses to use it versus when a Democrat President, like Barry, used/ uses it. That hypocrisy, however, is on you.

bla bla bla - talking points, no factual info

house impeaches

senate conducts hearing to remove

study up dipboi.

51 in the Senate doesn't remove, IQ7.

ahhhh-

another dumbass that cant count a senate majority

and these pukes want to drive the bus.

You were talking impeachment, IQ7.

51 has no bearing on impeachment, 67 does, IQ7.

Learn second grade level civics, moron.

 

[Siete]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

nope keep trying-

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH.

PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.


your pretty funny though ........

 

[jc456]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

nope keep trying-

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH.

PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.


your pretty funny though ........

Senate then dismisses per their rules. Cool.

I am curious, why do you think the house has responsibilities for the senate? The upper house? You have so much irony, you’re now too heavy

 

[Nostra]

Trump refuses to let witnesses testify -

Trumpdrones start demanding evidence only a witness can provide

senate republicans become the pulling guard in a trap play

evidence - yeah, dats it, EVIDENCE

DEMS AINT GOT NO DAMN EVIDENCE.

You scream at the Republicans for not going after the "evidence", yet have no condemnation for the democrats who didn't go after it either when they had the power. Interesting, that.

By blocking cooperation Trump ensures a paucity of proof, You then point to the void and say absence of evidence indicates there’s no case.


say it aint so Shane, say it aint so...........

And the democrats failed to go after the "evidence" you say exists, bottom line. Now they, and you, want the Senate to do their job for them, but somehow the democrats are blameless. They had the power and the means to compel testimony but did not.

how could the house gain evidence after Trump blocked witnesses -

cracker jack boxes

pretty damn dumb aint ya ..............

Take it to the courts and get a ruling, as our system prescribes, IQ7.

Get an education.

 

[ChrisL]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

nope keep trying-

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH.

PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.


your pretty funny though ........

"THE HOUSE DOESN'T NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH."

Umm, I think that they do.

 

[Siete]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

nope keep trying-

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH.

PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.


your pretty funny though ........

"THE HOUSE DOESN'T NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH."

Umm, I think that they do.

KEEP THINKING -

LOFTY GOAL IT MAY BE

 

[ChrisL]

The bottom line is that:

Based on a case / information resulting from the House's Impeachment Hearings the House Democrats...minus 3...voted to Impeach the President.

After declaring their 'fastest Rush to Impeach in US history based on the weakest case in US history' was due to the 'fact' that the President was / is such a threat to our national security they had to act immediately. The Speaker then sat on the Articles for weeks.

Upon arriving n the US Senate, the House Impeachment Managers declared they are unable / unwilling to present to the Senate the exact same case / information that led them to decide to vote to Impeach the President.


The US Senate wants to hear WHY the House Democrats voted to Impeach the President.

The US Senate wants to know what is the information that already exists, the information on which they based their decision to Impeach. the President.



The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

nope keep trying-

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH.

PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.


your pretty funny though ........

"THE HOUSE DOESN'T NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH."

Umm, I think that they do.

KEEP THINKING -

LOFTY GOAL IT MAY BE

Of course they have to share evidence. Why are you typing in all caps anyways? A little frustrated and angry perhaps? Good.

 

[Rye Catcher]

53 Republicans voted to support McConnell's effort to suppress evidence. This is the first win of many battles goes & for The President.

We an expect every vote to provide evidence to lose 53 - 47 and, potentially, lead to a kangaroo trial.

If so Trump will pump his chest and claim he is innocent, but that will not be the last word. The evidence and the truth will come out, and the public opinion will decide if The President deserves a second term.

This ain't the House with the majority of filthy Democrats that always voted to suppress evidence in favor of Trump.

Welcome to the party, Pal.

You have no idea what you’re talking about.

You stupid uneducated low information Moon Bats are always in denial, aren't you?

Idiot-gram, variety ad hominem and trolling.

 

[Flash]

Nadler is the clown running the House JUDICIAL Committee who demanded the US AG BREAK THE LAW ... Then CENSURED him for REFUSING to break the law Nadler helped pass.

Schiff is the MORON who LIED to the other 400+/- LAWYERS in the House by claiming a law exists that affords whistle blowers anonymity and immunity...as if they didn't know the law and he could sneak that lie past them.

...and Pelosi picked these two ass-clowns to lead the House's Impeachment disaster in front of the Senate.

Bwuhahahaha....

Trump said that he has now Nadler for years and that Nadlier is a sleazeball. We all know that to be true.

Which is why Trump had contributed to Nadler’s campaign when he was first running for office.

Trump was a New York businessman that bought politicians. Nadlier was a scumbag seller of his influence.

One of the best things about Trump is that he can't be bought. Filthy corrupt Democrats can't stand that about him. They thrive on corruption.

 

[Rye Catcher]

What were you watching today?

The House Coup Managers admitting they Impeached the President without a crime, without evidence, and without witnesses .... begging the Senate to allow them to do the House's job - investigate, file subpoenas, and look for evidence rhey could not find to justify their Impeachment.

The House voted to Impeach based on an existing case manufactured in the House. ...

...why can't they simply present that case to the Senate

...why can't they articulate why they voted to Impeach / justify their vote to Impeach?

The fact that they, after delaying submitting Articles of Impeachment for weeks, are unprepared to present the justification for Impeaching the President demonstrates criminal partisanship / incompetence.

The Democrats have already provided justification for immediate dismissal of the House's Articles of Impeachment, and we are only in the process of establishing the Senate Rules for conducting Senate Impeachment.

.

Ludicrous ^^^

 

[easyt65]

dipshit clowns like you want INFORMATION - THE HOUSE DOESNT NEED TO SHARE SHIT TO IMPEACH. PER the Constitution, they make the rules when the ball is in their court.

Guess what, lil' snowflake......that applies both ways. Nadler and Schiff don't get to come in and demand anything from the Senate - they are there to present the House's case for Impeachment - THAT'S IT. They refuse to do so.


The House voted to Impeach the President based on EXISTING information, NOT on what other information there might be 'out there'. The Senate wants to know what THAT EXISTING information / case was....

THAT information, THAT case, on which they based their Impeachment of the President, either warrants Impeachment - which they already voted for, or it does NOT.

...the FACT that the Democrats are unprepared / UNWILLING to present THAT case / information, the justification for their vote to Impeach, says all anyone needs to know about the Democrats' Impeachment.

WHY is it so hard for the House Coup Managers to simply tell why House Democrats - most of them - voted to Impeach the President?

 

[Siete]

What were you watching today?

The House Coup Managers admitting they Impeached the President without a crime, without evidence, and without witnesses .... begging the Senate to allow them to do the House's job - investigate, file subpoenas, and look for evidence rhey could not find to justify their Impeachment.

The House voted to Impeach based on an existing case manufactured in the House. ...

...why can't they simply present that case to the Senate

...why can't they articulate why they voted to Impeach / justify their vote to Impeach?

The fact that they, after delaying submitting Articles of Impeachment for weeks, are unprepared to present the justification for Impeaching the President demonstrates criminal partisanship / incompetence.

The Democrats have already provided justification for immediate dismissal of the House's Articles of Impeachment, and we are only in the process of establishing the Senate Rules for conducting Senate Impeachment.

.

Ludicrous ^^^

95% of these idiots are clueless about impeachment proceedings ..

 

[Flash]

I haven't been watching because I know it will make me want to throw up, but I have read some of the posts in this thread.

How do you guys think it will turn out? Will Trump be removed or not? I hear that the leftists don't have much evidence, if any evidence at all.

Just like Trump was impeached along partisan lines in the filthy ass Democrat House he will be exonerated in the Senate along party lines with a couple of Democrat switchovers.

Trump will win reelection by a landslide and his coattails will carry the House for the Republicans.

The Democrats really fucked up with this Impeachment Dirty Tricks Operation. They are too stupid to know it. Probably because the TDS mental illness is preventing them from thinking straight.

 

[jc456]

Why did the house present to the senate?

 

[Nostra]

What were you watching today?

The House Coup Managers admitting they Impeached the President without a crime, without evidence, and without witnesses .... begging the Senate to allow them to do the House's job - investigate, file subpoenas, and look for evidence rhey could not find to justify their Impeachment.

The House voted to Impeach based on an existing case manufactured in the House. ...

...why can't they simply present that case to the Senate

...why can't they articulate why they voted to Impeach / justify their vote to Impeach?

The fact that they, after delaying submitting Articles of Impeachment for weeks, are unprepared to present the justification for Impeaching the President demonstrates criminal partisanship / incompetence.

The Democrats have already provided justification for immediate dismissal of the House's Articles of Impeachment, and we are only in the process of establishing the Senate Rules for conducting Senate Impeachment.

.

Ludicrous ^^^

95% of these idiots are clueless about impeachment proceedings ..

Sez the moron who thinks Trump will be removed in his 2nd term by 51 Dimwingers in the Senate.

 

[The Original Tree]

You lie about the lies you tell. Prove anyone on The President's Defense Team Lied.

How's the weather in Moscow today, Tree? If must be damn cold this time outside the Kremlin.

PRICELESS!

The Democrats are getting eviscerated for showing up to the Senate and declaring they do not have the evidence to Justify their House Impeachment, and snowflakes like you desperately turn to the debunked / abandoned 'Russian Collusion Delusion'!

BWUHAHAHAHAHA....

Where are you seeing that? Who said that?
OH, the lyin' Republicans said that.
The same one who said there were no Republicans were in the SCIF during the investigation?

You just proved

1. You are not watching / following the Impeachment Hearing

And / Or....

2. You know less about the law than Schiff and Nadler, which is saying ALOT!

I see you didn't care to answer the question.
Just more sophomoric bullshit.
Cipollone blatantly lied in front of a SC judge:
Pat Cipollone wrong on GOP access to SCIF depositions



"Not even (House Intelligence Chairman Adam) Schiff’s Republican colleagues were allowed into the SCIF" during the House impeachment investigation."
— Pat Cipollone on Tuesday, January 21st, 2020 in remarks in the Senate impeachment trial
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...-trial-pat-cipollone-was-wrong-gop-access-sc/

 

[jc456]

What were you watching today?

The House Coup Managers admitting they Impeached the President without a crime, without evidence, and without witnesses .... begging the Senate to allow them to do the House's job - investigate, file subpoenas, and look for evidence rhey could not find to justify their Impeachment.

The House voted to Impeach based on an existing case manufactured in the House. ...

...why can't they simply present that case to the Senate

...why can't they articulate why they voted to Impeach / justify their vote to Impeach?

The fact that they, after delaying submitting Articles of Impeachment for weeks, are unprepared to present the justification for Impeaching the President demonstrates criminal partisanship / incompetence.

The Democrats have already provided justification for immediate dismissal of the House's Articles of Impeachment, and we are only in the process of establishing the Senate Rules for conducting Senate Impeachment.

.

Ludicrous ^^^

95% of these idiots are clueless about impeachment proceedings ..

Sez the moron who thinks Trump will be removed in his 2nd term by 51 Dimwingers in the Senate.

Can’t make it up