Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Went to a gun show this morning.
Number of guns? 100kish.
Number of people? 2kish.
Number carrying firearms? 60% open carrying, probably another 30% concealed.
Murders? None.
Guns don't kill anyone. What they do accomplish is I spent a few hours in the absolute safest part of Phoenix today.
[
I don't own a gun. I support the Second Amendment, however, which states:
Our founders put that Amendment right under freedom of speech and religion in the 1st Amendment. It kept equal fire power in the hands of ordinary people to prevent unwanted occupation of private property by hostile forces. They knew better than we what repressive government is. We may know how bad this is, however, if the present government gets any bigger and continues the partisan rhetoric that made the last 4 years divisive. We don't need more division, we need less division and more avenues of reconciliation for a stronger America.
Common sense and gun grabbers don't exist together, you failed.Then you don't have a fucking clue about the history of what you support.
The first gun laws were against freed blacks to keep them disarmed
know your history of what you support you fucking racist.
Oh, was THAT what you were getting at? Seriously?
Isn't that up there with "Hitler was a vegetarian, so vegetarians are evil" kind of logic?
Not that I really thought you had a valid, intelligent or rational point. Or that it took five pages for you to actually try to make it.
Point is, there is room for common sense gun laws.
Civilians don't need military grade weapons and crazy people shouldn't be allowed to buy them.
I mean, come on, practice a bit of common sense here, guy.
Common sense and gun grabbers don't exist together, you failed.Then you don't have a fucking clue about the history of what you support.
The first gun laws were against freed blacks to keep them disarmed
know your history of what you support you fucking racist.
Oh, was THAT what you were getting at? Seriously?
Isn't that up there with "Hitler was a vegetarian, so vegetarians are evil" kind of logic?
Not that I really thought you had a valid, intelligent or rational point. Or that it took five pages for you to actually try to make it.
Point is, there is room for common sense gun laws.
Civilians don't need military grade weapons and crazy people shouldn't be allowed to buy them.
I mean, come on, practice a bit of common sense here, guy.
Common sense and gun grabbers don't exist together, you failed.Oh, was THAT what you were getting at? Seriously?
Isn't that up there with "Hitler was a vegetarian, so vegetarians are evil" kind of logic?
Not that I really thought you had a valid, intelligent or rational point. Or that it took five pages for you to actually try to make it.
Point is, there is room for common sense gun laws.
Civilians don't need military grade weapons and crazy people shouldn't be allowed to buy them.
I mean, come on, practice a bit of common sense here, guy.
Uh, no, what is crazy is the kind of 2nd Amendment absolutism you clowns go with.
I have no problem with responsible private gun ownership. I personally think most reasons you guys give yourselves for wanting a gun are silly. You don't really need them, you just want them because of your own insecurities. But as long as you are being RESPONSIBLE, I don't have a problem with it.
Letting crazy people buy guns is not common sense. It's actually kind of foolish.
Letting guns shows and straw buyers buy lots and lots of guns that end up in the hands of people who shouldn't have them is crazy.
Common Sense does not = bigrebdoosh.
At least you don't try to hide your irrational fear of scary black guns.
Why in the hell does anybody need an assault rifle?? The only things I can think of is to knock off a liquor store or a gas station!! Nobody needs a stupid assault rifle.
Calling it an assault rifle is your problem. It's only an assault weapon if you are attacking someone, which means the only people that have them will be criminals. An assault weapon is also a defense weapon that can be used to protect yourself.
Change the name around a bit here. Would you be in favor of every citizen being able to purchase a defense weapon?
How is someone who thinks he has to steal to get by going to pay back the guy he ripped off, dumbass?[
Your answer to a high incarceration rate is to stop making things illegal to do.
Congratulations. You're a retard.
Most people who are in prison are in prison for things they shouldn't be in prison for.
Drug use alone makes up 20% of incarcerations. Most property crimes should be dealt with via restitution, not incarceration.
Prove the bolded, you stupid lying son of a bitch. I grow tired of your bullshit.But we have rich people making money off cheap labor, which is why we do it, and stupid people like you who balk at teaching kids how to read are happy to pay a lot more to lock them up.
It's really easy to not go to jail.Murderers and rapists should be locked up. Guys who smoked a joint or stole a slice of Pizza shouldn't be.
You need to tell your little tin god that.Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips
Read more at Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips (NASDAQ:SWHC, NYSE:RGR) | Market Daily News
The agenda no longer needs to be hidden from public view. With President Obama winning another term and democrats taking control of the Senate, the move to fundamentally change America from within has begun with a vengeance.
Were all aware of the restrictive gun laws in the State of California which require low capacity magazines for handguns, fixed magazines for assault rifles, and a whole lot of running around just to be granted the right to carry a concealed firearm.
Now, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who has championed gun control in her state for decades and co-wrote the original assault weapons ban enacted by the federal government in the 1990′s, wishes to bring even more stringent federal mandates to the land of the free.
What is being proposed by Feinstein is the most significant attack on the second amendment in history.
I dont have the minutes of the meeting (yet), but sources tell me California Senator and longtime gun-hater Dianne Feinsteins legal staff held meetings on Friday with FTB/ATF legal staff to discuss a new Assault Weapons Ban Madame Feinstein would be looking to push through Congress if President Obama wins reelection.
This same pretty good intelligence says the items that would lead to a banwould ban pistol grips and high-capacity magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban sales of weapons in possession.
The progressive war on the Second Amendment is going to escalate.
Actually, the Senator has not moved to do anything, as shes introduced no legislation. And shes been on the record as an advocate of a new AWB for years, this is nothing new.
Feinstein is in the minority among the democratic delegation concerning an AWB, and as with similar measures in the House, such a proposal would never make it out of committee.
Unlike republicans and abortion, the vast majority of democrats have accepted settled law on the issue and moved on.
Should by some bizarre, impossible process a new AWB in enacted, its implementation would be immediately enjoined by a Federal court and later invalidated as un-Constitutional, and that ruling would be upheld by the High Court.
This is a non-issue, a failed and partisan attempt to contrive a controversy where none exists.
Felons are banned from weapons in almost all cases.
The few exceptions occur only after long waiting periods and still interviews and examinations.
This is why you can't own a weapon again, bigrebdoosh.
Then you don't have a fucking clue about the history of what you support.
The first gun laws were against freed blacks to keep them disarmed
know your history of what you support you fucking racist.
Oh, was THAT what you were getting at? Seriously?
Isn't that up there with "Hitler was a vegetarian, so vegetarians are evil" kind of logic?
Not that I really thought you had a valid, intelligent or rational point. Or that it took five pages for you to actually try to make it.
Point is, there is room for common sense gun laws.
Civilians don't need military grade weapons and crazy people shouldn't be allowed to buy them.
I mean, come on, practice a bit of common sense here, guy.
That wasn't my argument, and you don't think at all, you stupid son of a bitch.And if they can't get guns, they'll use some other weapon, as has been undeniably been proven.No, less guns will, though.
I'm reasonably sure that Joker Holmes wouldn't have been able to kill as many people with his shoe and a box turtle, which I think was your argument.
Or they might have to defend their family against a criminal:In America how many deaths are caused by guns annually
According to the CDC in 2006, Last up to date numbers, 30,896 total, of which, 642 accidental, 16,883 were Suicide, 12,791 were Homicide, 220 were Undetermined and 360 by Legal intervention.
Okay, so suicide beats Homicide . But let's go one further. What percentage of murder victims know their murderers?
Sociology: Crimes against People
Murders generally happen within the context of family or other interpersonal relations, and most victims know their murderer. In some cases, the victim even unintentionally prompts the murderer to attack, by making verbal threats, striking the first blow, or trying to use a weapon, which is called victim-precipitated murder. The majority of killers are not psychotic or mentally deranged. While sensational murders and murderers, like the Son of Sam, receive much publicity, they probably make up a very small percentage of the total.
But we totally need people to have guns. really. They might have to kill a family member with a box turtle.
I'm not afraid of a turtle.Dave's biggest fear..
"stop me before I kill again."
Oh, look, another ignorant dumbass who doesn't know that Obama's looking to ban not only assault weapons, but handguns, too.Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips
Read more at Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips (NASDAQ:SWHC, NYSE:RGR) | Market Daily News
The agenda no longer needs to be hidden from public view. With President Obama winning another term and democrats taking control of the Senate, the move to fundamentally change America from within has begun with a vengeance.
Were all aware of the restrictive gun laws in the State of California which require low capacity magazines for handguns, fixed magazines for assault rifles, and a whole lot of running around just to be granted the right to carry a concealed firearm.
Now, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who has championed gun control in her state for decades and co-wrote the original assault weapons ban enacted by the federal government in the 1990′s, wishes to bring even more stringent federal mandates to the land of the free.
What is being proposed by Feinstein is the most significant attack on the second amendment in history.
I dont have the minutes of the meeting (yet), but sources tell me California Senator and longtime gun-hater Dianne Feinsteins legal staff held meetings on Friday with FTB/ATF legal staff to discuss a new Assault Weapons Ban Madame Feinstein would be looking to push through Congress if President Obama wins reelection.
This same pretty good intelligence says the items that would lead to a banwould ban pistol grips and high-capacity magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban sales of weapons in possession.
The progressive war on the Second Amendment is going to escalate.
Well, another scare story. Ought to be good for a few gun sales. All you nutters better head in tho the local gun shop and stock up while you can. I'm sure the black helicopters are circling with the UN troops ready to snatch up your precious arsenals.
