Serial Plagiarizer Rand Paul Strikes Again

[Dot Com]

Was Fein’s lawsuit taken from him? The attorney certainly seemed to think so – Milbank produced an email in which he (not his spokesperson) told Paul’s top political advisor just this week, “My marginalization was thoroughly unfair.” He added, “My outstanding invoice for work indispensable to the lawsuit should be paid.”

The entirety of the email chain is online and available for public scrutiny – some of the messages get quite colorful – and taken together, it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Rand Paul’s operation apparently took Fein’s work, used it, failed to give him credit, and failed to fully compensate him for his time and effort.

'My marginalization was thoroughly unfair' | MSNBC

Oh bite me. His feelings were hurt. He never once in that whole email that Milbank produced as "evidence" said that Cuccinelli or Rand Paul stole his work.

Milbank wanted to believe the ex wife. He wanted to smear Rand Paul. But sorries.

He got hosed.

ummm..... tinyd You just quoted the "smoking-gun" as it were. Paul used that attorney's work, so that he could jump in front of a camera AGAIN, and he didn't compensate the lawyer for his work.

Stop taking the rw brown acid and come to the light!!!

 

[Star]

Was Fein’s lawsuit taken from him? The attorney certainly seemed to think so – Milbank produced an email in which he (not his spokesperson) told Paul’s top political advisor just this week, “My marginalization was thoroughly unfair.” He added, “My outstanding invoice for work indispensable to the lawsuit should be paid.”

The entirety of the email chain is online and available for public scrutiny – some of the messages get quite colorful – and taken together, it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Rand Paul’s operation apparently took Fein’s work, used it, failed to give him credit, and failed to fully compensate him for his time and effort.

'My marginalization was thoroughly unfair' | MSNBC

Oh bite me. His feelings were hurt. He never once in that whole email that Milbank produced as "evidence" said that Cuccinelli or Rand Paul stole his work.

Milbank wanted to believe the ex wife. He wanted to smear Rand Paul. But sorries.

He got hosed.

What part(s) of "All of this has been especially distressing" and "My marginalization was thoroughly unfair." are you incapable of comprehending?

Like I said in a previous message, the Rand Paul team at this point, isn't talking probably to give themselves time to invent a cover story so they don't Bill Baroni themselves.

Below is the latest from Dana Milbank. The new article is mostly soup and salad, below is an excerpt of the meat of the article, i.e. Bruce Fein's personal email.


E-mails back claim that Sen. Rand Paul ‘stole’ NSA lawsuit

Dear Doug,

The protocols for preparing and filing the class action complaint today were hugely suboptimal.

My name was not on the complaint despite the fact that it was predominantly my work product over several weeks and two hundred hours of research, meetings, and drafting. Ken never showed me the final complaint before submission. My name could not be on the complaint under DC Bar Rules because I could not prepare a timely engagement letter. I was never informed until yesterday by Ken of the details of the collaborative arrangement between FreedomWorks and Rand for litigating and paying for the lawsuit. I promptly revised the engagement letter when the information was received, and it has been forwarded via Ken to Rand and FreedomWorks.

I did not learn of the date for filing except by inadvertence from Ken a few days ago.
I was not included in any briefing of Rand about the complaint before filing and press conference today despite the fact that I know vastly more about the Fourth Amendment issue and the history of NSA surveillance than anyone else on the team.

All of this has been especially distressing because I have been an impeccable team player from the outset. I did not ask for an upfront retainer. I did not publicize my role to the media. I heavily discounted my fees. I shared my work product freely with Ken. I responded to all of Ken’s inquiries with alacrity. And I have eagerly defended Rand in the past on Fourth Amendment issues in the media.

Yet I was excluded from key decision points leading up to the filing of the complaint and press conference as though I could not be trusted. I was not only excluded from meetings. I was never informed that they took place and what the decisions were.

My marginalization was thoroughly unfair. Going forward, I expect complete transparency and inclusion on all non-trivial decisions. My name will be on all future pleadings. Ken and I plan to meet shortly to discuss these matters.
My outstanding invoice for work indispensable to the lawsuit should be paid no later than Friday, February 14, an expectation which is completely justified in light of all the circumstances. Please alert me if the work description on the invoice needs alteration.

Thanks for your attention to these matters.

Bruce Fein



.

 

[HenryBHough]

Looks like Shrillary has added "how to tweet" to the list of things she has put out of memory.