RWNJ
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2015
- 4,287
- 641
- 275
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #161
But he was a giant. Head and shoulders, and then some, above everyone else. There is also one guy who was 9' tall. Robert something or other. NINE FEET! You don't think that qualifies as a giant?I don't know where his skeleton is, but Vikas Uppal was over eight feet tall. Considering the average height back in Biblical times, he would definitely be considered a giant. And who's say that there wasn't a race of giants back then? After all, they were wiped out, eventually. Maybe we'll find one of THEIR skeletons some day. But giants DO exist. It's a fact.Okay, stupid insults aside, can you give me even ONE indisputable incident of an actual giant's skeleton being found
I would need proof of that. Meaning, an intact, and ancient skeleton. Nothing less will do. Old newspaper articles, like the one someone else posted, do not qualify as evidence. Show me indisputable evidence of giants, and maybe I'll believe. Vikas Uppal was tall, sure, but nobody would refer to him as a "giant", as in, say, the Nephilim.