Seven women have come forward with accusations against Joe Biden

[lennypartiv]

How does Trump apologize for molesting 25 women and not look ridiculous?

Proof? Trump has done nothing wrong with the women he has encountered.

 

[OldLady]

"Obviously she is lying. else she would not have waited so long."

Every trump cultist, until they find out she accused Biden.

Female accusers must be believed, Dem's said so during the Kavanaugh hearings.

Yeah, but that was different, and stuff.

I love rubbing the left's nose in their hypocrisy and double standards. It's like the fools have a decision tree...IF Dem THEN Nothing ELSE Demand Hearing.

The 26 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

In May 2023, a Manhattan jury found Donald Trump liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll. Here's who else has accused him of misconduct.

www.businessinsider.com

But, but, but, they're all lying..............right Trumpleton's?

We are discussing the PENETRATION allegation against creepy Joe Biden by a former staffer. She filed a report with the DC police. You idiots need to scrape up a new presidential candidate quick.

She didn't name him in the report. The statute has run. Don't hold your breath waiting for the police to convict him.

 

[ColonelAngus]

“The reason I voted the way I did was to try to prevent a war from happening, because, remember, the threat was to go to war,” said Biden.

“The argument was because Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. So [President George W. Bush] said that, ‘I need to be able to get the security council to agree to send in inspectors to put pressure on Saddam to find out whether or not he’s producing nuclear weapons.’

“And at the time, I said, ‘that’s your reason? All right, I get it.’

“The rationale was, that’s the way to not go to war. Because I didn’t believe he had those nuclear weapons. I didn’t believe he had those weapons of mass destruction.” (emphasis added.)

This directly contradicts Biden’s words in October 2002, when during a Senate debate he said:

“The objective is to compel Iraq to destroy its illegal weapons of mass destruction and its programs to develop and produce missiles and more of those weapons.”

In the same speech, Biden said that “the reason [Hussein] poses a growing danger to the United States and its allies is that he possesses chemical and biological weapons and is seeking nuclear weapons, with the $2 billion a year he illegally skims from the U.N. oil-for-food program. For four years now, he has prevented United Nations inspectors from uncovering those weapons and verifying Iraq's disarmament, and he is in violation of the terms he agreed to allowing him to stay in power.”

What an utter piece of shit.

Straight up lied.

 

[Polishprince]

Maybe they can compare notes with the 16 women who accuse Trump.
Has Biden paid off porn stars yet?

Biden is too much of a loser to score with a smokin' hot porn star.

Unlike Trump, Biden has not been known to PAY for sex stars
.

How would you know that? The idea of "hush money" is that the recipient is supposed to "hush" or keep quiet after you pay.

 

[BluesLegend]

"Obviously she is lying. else she would not have waited so long."

Every trump cultist, until they find out she accused Biden.

Female accusers must be believed, Dem's said so during the Kavanaugh hearings.

Yeah, but that was different, and stuff.

I love rubbing the left's nose in their hypocrisy and double standards. It's like the fools have a decision tree...IF Dem THEN Nothing ELSE Demand Hearing.

The 26 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

In May 2023, a Manhattan jury found Donald Trump liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll. Here's who else has accused him of misconduct.

www.businessinsider.com

But, but, but, they're all lying..............right Trumpleton's?

We are discussing the PENETRATION allegation against creepy Joe Biden by a former staffer. She filed a report with the DC police. You idiots need to scrape up a new presidential candidate quick.

She didn't name him in the report. The statute has run. Don't hold your breath waiting for the police to convict him.

That he did it isn't important???

 

[Lakhota]

Seven women have come forward with accusations against Joe Biden

Even if true - so what. That didn't stop Trump. Now maybe Evangelicals will flock to Biden.

 

[OldLady]

"Obviously she is lying. else she would not have waited so long."

Every trump cultist, until they find out she accused Biden.

Female accusers must be believed, Dem's said so during the Kavanaugh hearings.

Yeah, but that was different, and stuff.

I love rubbing the left's nose in their hypocrisy and double standards. It's like the fools have a decision tree...IF Dem THEN Nothing ELSE Demand Hearing.

The 26 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

In May 2023, a Manhattan jury found Donald Trump liable for the sexual abuse of E. Jean Carroll. Here's who else has accused him of misconduct.

www.businessinsider.com

But, but, but, they're all lying..............right Trumpleton's?

We are discussing the PENETRATION allegation against creepy Joe Biden by a former staffer. She filed a report with the DC police. You idiots need to scrape up a new presidential candidate quick.

She didn't name him in the report. The statute has run. Don't hold your breath waiting for the police to convict him.

That he did it isn't important???

I'm just pointing out why the police won't be investigating him.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

The point is, Democrats spent 3+ years trying to impeach Trump with stuff like this

No, they didn’t. You’re a liar.

They obviously did.

They spent three years trying to impeach him for being a sexual predator? No, they didn’t. You’re a moron

What part of "stuff like this" didn't you understand?

Impeaching him for abuse of power and obstruction is not “stuff like sexual assault”.

Made up bullshit is made up bullshit.

Cool. Lamar Alexander didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Mitt Romney didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Trump, 45th president, impeached.

Romney knew it was bullshit, and so did Alexander. Romney hated Trump. That's the only reason he voted in favor. Alexander didn't vote in favor, so why are you listing him?

Why am I listing Lamar Alexander? Because he said that Dems made their case, but he didn’t think that they were impeachable offenses.

“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’”

“The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did.”

Alexander Statement on Impeachment Witness Vote - Press Releases - United States Senator Lamar Alexander

 

[Nostra]

And idiots still consider them to be a news source, and not just an arm of the Dimsocialist party.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'



The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by seven women that the former vice president had touched them inappropriately.

The Times piece also focuses on unrelated sexual misconduct accusations against President Trump, and largely dismisses Reade's allegations as uncorroborated by her co-workers -- even though the Times notes later in its piece that Reade's claim was contemporaneously corroborated by two of Reade's friends.

According to a copy of the Times' article saved by the Internet archive Wayback Machine, the Times originally reported: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

That paragraph now reads: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden."

(((AG)))@AGHamilton29
https://twitter.com/AGHamilton29/status/1249364556058591233
Replying to @AGHamilton29

Remember the press spent a month essentially arguing that underage drinking was evidence that Kavanaugh committed sexual assault, but a long pattern of "hugs, kisses, and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable" proves Biden's innocence.


463
10:51 AM - Apr 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy

197 people are talking about this



The Times' handling of Reade's accusations, conservative commentators and some Democrats said, stood in stark contrast to how the media and several senators handled accusations about Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Reade filed a report with Washington, D.C., police on Thursday concerning her allegation that Biden penetrated her without consent in 1993. Fox News has confirmed with the District’s police department that she filed the criminal complaint, which does not reference Biden by name. The Biden campaign has strongly denied Reade's accusation, although the former vice president has previously acknowledged that he should change his behavior around women.

The Times' piece contained other references to the several women who have said Biden touched them in inappropriate ways, but deleted any mention of them in the section of its article that asserted that Biden had no "pattern" of misconduct.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'

The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by several women that the...

www.foxnews.com

 

[toobfreak]

And idiots still consider them to be a news source, and not just an arm of the Dimsocialist party.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'



The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by seven women that the former vice president had touched them inappropriately.

The Times piece also focuses on unrelated sexual misconduct accusations against President Trump, and largely dismisses Reade's allegations as uncorroborated by her co-workers -- even though the Times notes later in its piece that Reade's claim was contemporaneously corroborated by two of Reade's friends.

According to a copy of the Times' article saved by the Internet archive Wayback Machine, the Times originally reported: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

That paragraph now reads: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden."

(((AG)))@AGHamilton29

Replying to @AGHamilton29

Remember the press spent a month essentially arguing that underage drinking was evidence that Kavanaugh committed sexual assault, but a long pattern of "hugs, kisses, and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable" proves Biden's innocence.

463
10:51 AM - Apr 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy

197 people are talking about this


The Times' handling of Reade's accusations, conservative commentators and some Democrats said, stood in stark contrast to how the media and several senators handled accusations about Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Reade filed a report with Washington, D.C., police on Thursday concerning her allegation that Biden penetrated her without consent in 1993. Fox News has confirmed with the District’s police department that she filed the criminal complaint, which does not reference Biden by name. The Biden campaign has strongly denied Reade's accusation, although the former vice president has previously acknowledged that he should change his behavior around women.

The Times' piece contained other references to the several women who have said Biden touched them in inappropriate ways, but deleted any mention of them in the section of its article that asserted that Biden had no "pattern" of misconduct.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'

The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by several women that the...

www.foxnews.com

Why not?

They whitewashed Obama's past.​

They whitewashed Hillary's past actions and deeds.​

They blatantly exaggerate if not lie and make up stuff on Trump.​

It only stands to reason they would rewrite Joe Biden until he had angel wings! Joe was practically right at the rising of Christ!

I SEE BLUE DEMOCRATS!

 

[Blackrook]

NYT cannot be trusted. They are shills for the left-wing propaganda apparatus.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

And idiots still consider them to be a news source, and not just an arm of the Dimsocialist party.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'



The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by seven women that the former vice president had touched them inappropriately.

The Times piece also focuses on unrelated sexual misconduct accusations against President Trump, and largely dismisses Reade's allegations as uncorroborated by her co-workers -- even though the Times notes later in its piece that Reade's claim was contemporaneously corroborated by two of Reade's friends.

According to a copy of the Times' article saved by the Internet archive Wayback Machine, the Times originally reported: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden, beyond the hugs, kisses and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable."

That paragraph now reads: "No other allegation about sexual assault surfaced in the course of reporting, nor did any former Biden staff members corroborate any details of Ms. Reade’s allegation. The Times found no pattern of sexual misconduct by Mr. Biden."

(((AG)))@AGHamilton29

Replying to @AGHamilton29

Remember the press spent a month essentially arguing that underage drinking was evidence that Kavanaugh committed sexual assault, but a long pattern of "hugs, kisses, and touching that women previously said made them uncomfortable" proves Biden's innocence.

463
10:51 AM - Apr 12, 2020
Twitter Ads info and privacy

197 people are talking about this


The Times' handling of Reade's accusations, conservative commentators and some Democrats said, stood in stark contrast to how the media and several senators handled accusations about Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Reade filed a report with Washington, D.C., police on Thursday concerning her allegation that Biden penetrated her without consent in 1993. Fox News has confirmed with the District’s police department that she filed the criminal complaint, which does not reference Biden by name. The Biden campaign has strongly denied Reade's accusation, although the former vice president has previously acknowledged that he should change his behavior around women.

The Times' piece contained other references to the several women who have said Biden touched them in inappropriate ways, but deleted any mention of them in the section of its article that asserted that Biden had no "pattern" of misconduct.

New York Times edits Biden sexual assault coverage, deletes references to past inappropriate 'hugs, kisses and touching'

The New York Times stealth-edited its article on the sexual-assault allegation against Joe Biden by his former Senate staffer Tara Reade just minutes after it was published on Sunday morning, removing all references in a key paragraph to the multiple past accusations by several women that the...

www.foxnews.com

Why not?

They whitewashed Obama's past.​

They whitewashed Hillary's past actions and deeds.​

They blatantly exaggerate if not lie and make up stuff on Trump.​

It only stands to reason they would rewrite Joe Biden until he had angel wings! Joe was practically right at the rising of Christ!

View attachment 322646
I SEE BLUE DEMOCRATS!

But the Times did guarantee Hildabeast win so they got that going for them.

 

[excalibur]

They, as are all of the MSM, the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.

 

[bripat9643]

The point is, Democrats spent 3+ years trying to impeach Trump with stuff like this

No, they didn’t. You’re a liar.

They obviously did.

They spent three years trying to impeach him for being a sexual predator? No, they didn’t. You’re a moron

What part of "stuff like this" didn't you understand?

Impeaching him for abuse of power and obstruction is not “stuff like sexual assault”.

Made up bullshit is made up bullshit.

Cool. Lamar Alexander didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Mitt Romney didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Trump, 45th president, impeached.

Romney knew it was bullshit, and so did Alexander. Romney hated Trump. That's the only reason he voted in favor. Alexander didn't vote in favor, so why are you listing him?

Why am I listing Lamar Alexander? Because he said that Dems made their case, but he didn’t think that they were impeachable offenses.

“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’”

“The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did.”

Alexander Statement on Impeachment Witness Vote - Press Releases - United States Senator Lamar Alexander

In other words, Lamar didn't vote for the impeachment, which is what you claimed.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

The point is, Democrats spent 3+ years trying to impeach Trump with stuff like this

No, they didn’t. You’re a liar.

They obviously did.

They spent three years trying to impeach him for being a sexual predator? No, they didn’t. You’re a moron

What part of "stuff like this" didn't you understand?

Impeaching him for abuse of power and obstruction is not “stuff like sexual assault”.

Made up bullshit is made up bullshit.

Cool. Lamar Alexander didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Mitt Romney didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Trump, 45th president, impeached.

Romney knew it was bullshit, and so did Alexander. Romney hated Trump. That's the only reason he voted in favor. Alexander didn't vote in favor, so why are you listing him?

Why am I listing Lamar Alexander? Because he said that Dems made their case, but he didn’t think that they were impeachable offenses.

“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’”

“The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did.”

Alexander Statement on Impeachment Witness Vote - Press Releases - United States Senator Lamar Alexander

In other words, Lamar didn't vote for the impeachment, which is what you claimed.

Nope. I didn’t say that. Try some reading comprehension, kid.

 

[bripat9643]

The point is, Democrats spent 3+ years trying to impeach Trump with stuff like this

No, they didn’t. You’re a liar.

They obviously did.

They spent three years trying to impeach him for being a sexual predator? No, they didn’t. You’re a moron

What part of "stuff like this" didn't you understand?

Impeaching him for abuse of power and obstruction is not “stuff like sexual assault”.

Made up bullshit is made up bullshit.

Cool. Lamar Alexander didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Mitt Romney didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Trump, 45th president, impeached.

Romney knew it was bullshit, and so did Alexander. Romney hated Trump. That's the only reason he voted in favor. Alexander didn't vote in favor, so why are you listing him?

Why am I listing Lamar Alexander? Because he said that Dems made their case, but he didn’t think that they were impeachable offenses.

“There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’”

“The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did.”

Alexander Statement on Impeachment Witness Vote - Press Releases - United States Senator Lamar Alexander

In other words, Lamar didn't vote for the impeachment, which is what you claimed.

Nope. I didn’t say that. Try some reading comprehension, kid.

Sure you did:

"Cool. Lamar Alexander didn’t think it was made up bullshit. Mitt Romney didn’t think it was made up bullshit"

 

[Weatherman2020]

Unwanted physical contact is assault. Kisses and hugs is sexual assault.
So says every law book in America.

Why does the left think sexual assault is acceptable? It’s like the Left with Weinstein. After his arrest they’re all ‘yeah we knew but said nothing’

I posted the original tweet earlier, some leftist Mod buried it in some thread with ten gazzillion posts.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Unwanted physical contact is assault. Kisses and hugs is sexual assault.
So says every law book in America.

Why does the left think sexual assault is acceptable? It’s like the Left with Weinstein. After his arrest they’re all ‘yeah we knew but said nothing’

I posted the original tweet earlier, some leftist Mod buried it in some thread with ten gazzillion posts.

Most likely is because the liberals love to treat women like shit. Anthony Weiner couldnt get satisfied with Uma, so started showing his weiner to young girls on the internet. Jessie Jackson who was married fucked around with young girls and got one pregnant and used his embezzled money from corporations to pay her off to be quiet. Even liberal Arnold Schwarzenegger who married a Kennedy niece couldnt keep his pants on and wanted to become another male Kennedy by fathering a love child of a maid. Liberals love to fuck around their wives, it makes them "feel" so much better, and their wives they couldnt care less, just look at Hitlery and her man Slick Willie. Oh and teaching boys to be like this Pajama dude, no wonder they dont respect women..
.........................Would fight and die for his woman............................................Would turn his back on a woman and let her die............

 

[Weatherman2020]

 

[LeftofLeft]

Unwanted physical contact is assault. Kisses and hugs is sexual assault.
So says every law book in America.

Why does the left think sexual assault is acceptable? It’s like the Left with Weinstein. After his arrest they’re all ‘yeah we knew but said nothing’

I posted the original tweet earlier, some leftist Mod buried it in some thread with ten gazzillion posts.

If the NYT did it’s job, there would be no market for Fox News. It’s shit like this where supposed Media stalwarts sit on news that creates a market for other news sources.