Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech

[Yurt]

The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like.

It protects only political speech.

no it doesn't you ignorant jackass. no wonder you think taking away someone's retirement is not the same as confiscating it.

think defamation you simpleton

why did you cut "It protects primarily political speech, not all speech?" You posted after me

think breaking the rules, fool

i did not cut nor alter your post. in fact i'm reporting your post so the mods can verify that you're lying and edited your post. i quoted you verbatim.

you know, i knew this was going to happen.

 

[Yurt]

no it doesn't you ignorant jackass. no wonder you think taking away someone's retirement is not the same as confiscating it.

think defamation you simpleton

why did you cut "It protects primarily political speech, not all speech?" You posted after me

think breaking the rules, fool

Why do ALL of your opinions suck so badly?

good point, even his EDITED post shows how ignorant he is.

 

[Yurt]

You posted after my post was edited. Check the times, and stop lying.

too funny...jake now admits he edited his post and still calls me a liar for telling the truth

 

[Yurt]

jake?

 

[Yurt]

he is around....hmmmm

 

[Yurt]

The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like.

It protects only political speech.

no it doesn't you ignorant jackass. no wonder you think taking away someone's retirement is not the same as confiscating it.

think defamation you simpleton

why did you cut "It protects primarily political speech, not all speech?" You posted after me

think breaking the rules, fool

You posted after my post was edited. Check the times, and stop lying.

too funny...jake now admits he edited his post and still calls me a liar for telling the truth

jake?

 

[aaronleland]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

 

[Yurt]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

he is trolly like fakey

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

If you ever want to get back at someone just put a bumper sticker on their rear bumper that says 'Allah Sucks!'

 

[Yurt]

jake?

 

[Coyote]

There is very dangerous legislation making its way through both the House of Representatives and Senate that will finish the United States. The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not?

On Wednesday, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced “The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014″ (S.2219), which seeks “to examine the prevalence of hate crime and hate speech on the Internet, television, and radio to better address such crimes.” Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) introduced a companion bill in the House – H.R. 3878.

Yes, we see, Hakeem. The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like. Or else who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? Hakeem? When I was a young girl, the Nazis were given permission to march in a predominately Jewish neighborhood. In those days, Nazi mean something. Morality was still very much in the American DNA. Good and evil was understood — unlike today, where the left has banished such terms. Despite the horror of a Nazi march, they were given permission, and those of us who were repelled by such a monstrous action understood why permission was granted because of the underlying premise — free speech. I didn’t worry that their Nazi ideas would take hold, as long as I could speak and others could speak in the free exchange of ideas. I knew I would win because my ideas were better. Individual rights was the greatest achievement of the enlightened.

Now we are here. Our free speech is threatened by islamic supremacists and their Democrat lapdogs under the guise of “hate speech.” The old “hate speech” canard. They will package this revolution against freedom in a pretty package — and will use the Max Blumenthal-inspired racist murderer, Glenn Miller. But do not be fooled.

It’s bad enough they have all but blacklisted the voices of freedom from media, political and national discourse. Shouting into the wilderness is not freedom of speech.

What next? Burning books? Perhaps just as long as it’s not the quran. And yet there is more hate speech in the quran than in Mein Kampf......

Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

What Muslim legislators?

Hakeem Jeffries is a Baptist.
Ed Markey is a Roman Catholic
Pam Geller is a Looney.

 

[Vigilante]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

 

[Yurt]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

what speech does it ban. be specific.

 

[Vigilante]

There is very dangerous legislation making its way through both the House of Representatives and Senate that will finish the United States. The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not?

On Wednesday, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced “The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014″ (S.2219), which seeks “to examine the prevalence of hate crime and hate speech on the Internet, television, and radio to better address such crimes.” Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) introduced a companion bill in the House – H.R. 3878.

Yes, we see, Hakeem. The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like. Or else who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? Hakeem? When I was a young girl, the Nazis were given permission to march in a predominately Jewish neighborhood. In those days, Nazi mean something. Morality was still very much in the American DNA. Good and evil was understood — unlike today, where the left has banished such terms. Despite the horror of a Nazi march, they were given permission, and those of us who were repelled by such a monstrous action understood why permission was granted because of the underlying premise — free speech. I didn’t worry that their Nazi ideas would take hold, as long as I could speak and others could speak in the free exchange of ideas. I knew I would win because my ideas were better. Individual rights was the greatest achievement of the enlightened.

Now we are here. Our free speech is threatened by islamic supremacists and their Democrat lapdogs under the guise of “hate speech.” The old “hate speech” canard. They will package this revolution against freedom in a pretty package — and will use the Max Blumenthal-inspired racist murderer, Glenn Miller. But do not be fooled.

It’s bad enough they have all but blacklisted the voices of freedom from media, political and national discourse. Shouting into the wilderness is not freedom of speech.

What next? Burning books? Perhaps just as long as it’s not the quran. And yet there is more hate speech in the quran than in Mein Kampf......

Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

What Muslim legislators?

Hakeem Jeffries is a Baptist.
Ed Markey is a Roman Catholic
Pam Geller is a Looney.

First 2 you may be right on. Pam, just annoys FAGERALS, and muslim terrorist lovers, so I expect her to be called names!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

Of course. Because everything published on the internet must be true, right?

 

[Vigilante]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

Of course. Because everything published on the internet must be true, right?

Everything I post is true...just ask me!

 

[Yurt]

Again, it doesn't ban free speech. Interesting how Vigilante won't respond to any posts that point that out.

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

what speech does it ban. be specific.

 

[Vigilante]

Of course it does, if it didn't the author wouldn't have titled it as such!

what speech does it ban. be specific.

Are you that stupid that you can't read what the article says... dumb question on my part, of course you're that stupid!

Where is that crying YURT baby gif. when I need it!

 

[Yurt]

what speech does it ban. be specific.

Are you that stupid that you can't read what the article says... dumb question on my part, of course you're that stupid!

Where is that crying YURT baby gif. when I need it!

oh i see....you're a troll from that place....

not surprising

 

[Coyote]

There is very dangerous legislation making its way through both the House of Representatives and Senate that will finish the United States. The sharia bill calls for Islamic blasphemy laws — the criminalization of speech that offends or insults — who, exactly? Well, that is up to the enforcer, is it not?

On Wednesday, Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced “The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014″ (S.2219), which seeks “to examine the prevalence of hate crime and hate speech on the Internet, television, and radio to better address such crimes.” Congressman Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) introduced a companion bill in the House – H.R. 3878.

Yes, we see, Hakeem. The first amendment protects all speech, not just speech that we like. Or else who would decide what’s good and what’s forbidden? Hakeem? When I was a young girl, the Nazis were given permission to march in a predominately Jewish neighborhood. In those days, Nazi mean something. Morality was still very much in the American DNA. Good and evil was understood — unlike today, where the left has banished such terms. Despite the horror of a Nazi march, they were given permission, and those of us who were repelled by such a monstrous action understood why permission was granted because of the underlying premise — free speech. I didn’t worry that their Nazi ideas would take hold, as long as I could speak and others could speak in the free exchange of ideas. I knew I would win because my ideas were better. Individual rights was the greatest achievement of the enlightened.

Now we are here. Our free speech is threatened by islamic supremacists and their Democrat lapdogs under the guise of “hate speech.” The old “hate speech” canard. They will package this revolution against freedom in a pretty package — and will use the Max Blumenthal-inspired racist murderer, Glenn Miller. But do not be fooled.

It’s bad enough they have all but blacklisted the voices of freedom from media, political and national discourse. Shouting into the wilderness is not freedom of speech.

What next? Burning books? Perhaps just as long as it’s not the quran. And yet there is more hate speech in the quran than in Mein Kampf......

Sharia in America: Democrats and Muslim Legislators seek to criminalize free speech | Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs

What Muslim legislators?

Hakeem Jeffries is a Baptist.
Ed Markey is a Roman Catholic
Pam Geller is a Looney.

First 2 you may be right on. Pam, just annoys FAGERALS, and muslim terrorist lovers, so I expect her to be called names!

So where are these Muslim legislators behind this? Geller implies it's "Hakeem".

Geller is...a looney. Two fruits short of a loom. Wheel still turning, hamster dead.