SHOCK Poll: 51% of U.S. Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels

For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”

How many republicans want to put religious law over us law? Pretty much the same thing.

100% of Americans demand that Religious Law be set upon you low-rent fucks.

The Law prohibiting murder... rests entirely in "Religious Law". This as a function of the self-evident truth, that "We are all endowed by our Creator with certain, inalienable rights." Wherein God endows the individual with their life, thus it is not for any man to take the life of an innocent, as that life is from God.

Same with libel, calumny, slander, vilification, traducement... The individual is a child of God, so to malign an innocent is to malign God.

Same with theft... The product of one's labor is a function of the rights endowed to the innocent, to strip them of their gift from God is to do the same to God.

And so on down the line of unsound human behavior that is forbidden by the laws of nature that govern such.

In essence, a person who can't find the strength of courage to respect their maker, is a person unworthy of trust, thus is unworthy of being affiliated with the species... and therefore must be returned to the Creator, to spare the culture the burden of their feeble and offensive nature.

Those are common sense society laws that existed long before Christianity.






Yes, and they are ALL rooted in religion. The Epic of Gilgamesh contains among the first written laws we have and they came from religion.
 
OK, so they aren't solely the provenance of Islam. That doesn't alter the fact that the practice is an integral feature of Islam.

Bullshit. It happens coincident with Islam, and it happens absent Islam. It happens coincident with Sikhism, and it happens absent Sikhism. It happens coincident with Hinduism, and it happens absent Hinduism. It happens absent any classified "religion" at all. And maybe more to the point, it FAILS to happen coincident with ALL of those religions. And just to save time, perhaps we should note that Female Genital Mutilation follows exactly the same patterns of coincidence/noncoincidence.

What you have here is a blatant Coincidence fallacy, and a pretty desperate one.

Killing people for sport in the arena was also done in ancient Rome. What does that have to do with today? Supposedly our culture has advanced after 2000 years.

It's one more example of happening coincident with no-Islam. Islam didn't even EXIST at the time. I've demonstrated that 'honor' killing --- which is again a cultural practice and has no religious connection AT ALL -- was already there. Perhaps you've heard of linear time?


Perhaps you'd like to explain to the class how it is that honor killings can be found in India -- among Moslems, among Sikhs, among Hindus -- three religions that have nothing to do with each other -- while the geographic coincidence is.... ummmm.... just a coincidence?

Probably not.

Honor killings have nothing to do with (any) religion-- they have to do with social hierarchy and class and family status and control of women. That was the case in Rome, it's true in India, it's true in Pakistan. None of them have a religion in common.


When it started isn't the issue. When it ended is the issue. Christians haven't stoned anyone in 2000 years. Muslims stone people every week. Also, they never stoned anyone in Salem. They hung a few who were accused of being witches. That was 400 years ago. It's pathetic that you can't find anything Christian to compare the atrocities of Islam to unless you go back almost to the Middle Ages. Isn't that a clue to you that Islam is a primitive barbaric religion?

Actually I've been there and I've read the marker. A guy named Giles Corey was "pressed to death" on September 19, 1692. That means they put him under a huge slab, not big enough to kill him, just enough to press him slowly until he died. Kind of makes stoning look merciful.

More of your pig-ignorance.

Pretty sure they weren't Muslims though.
You know what they were?

A mob. Like you and your ignoramic ilk.

Your desperate flailing to apply cultural artifacts and mob mentality to a religion is part of that ignoramitude.
 
Last edited:
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”


"The Center for Security Policy" -- can you seriously not recognize a front group when you see one?

Are you that easily taken in by a "study" or a "poll" or "data" from a special interest or corporate front group or PR machine.

Let me paint a picture for you -- there's an empty office somewhere in Maryland with a P.O. Box. No body really works there as the entire operation is run from a PR firm on K-Street or nearby. They get paid to put out misleading propaganda calling them "polls" and "studies" and "data" and most legitimate news organizations won't touch these -- but Brietbart....

Are you starting to catch on?
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”


"The Center for Security Policy" -- can you seriously not recognize a front group when you see one?

Are you that easily taken in by a "study" or a "poll" or "data" from a special interest or corporate front group or PR machine.

Let me paint a picture for you -- there's an empty office somewhere in Maryland with a P.O. Box. No body really works there as the entire operation is run from a PR firm on K-Street or nearby. They get paid to put out misleading propaganda calling them "polls" and "studies" and "data" and most legitimate news organizations won't touch these -- but Brietbart....

Are you starting to catch on?

ROFLMNAO! Proving once again that you can NOT hide the idiots.
 
This is why we need The Donald as Prez...
Now more then ever....
We need to make America Great again....
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf
 
OK, so they aren't solely the provenance of Islam. That doesn't alter the fact that the practice is an integral feature of Islam.

Bullshit. It happens coincident with Islam, and it happens absent Islam. It happens coincident with Sikhism, and it happens absent Sikhism. It happens coincident with Hinduism, and it happens absent Hinduism. It happens absent any classified "religion" at all. And maybe more to the point, it FAILS to happen coincident with ALL of those religions. And just to save time, perhaps we should note that Female Genital Mutilation follows exactly the same patterns of coincidence/noncoincidence.

What you have here is a blatant Coincidence fallacy, and a pretty desperate one.

Killing people for sport in the arena was also done in ancient Rome. What does that have to do with today? Supposedly our culture has advanced after 2000 years.

It's one more example of happening coincident with no-Islam. Islam didn't even EXIST at the time. I've demonstrated that 'honor' killing --- which is again a cultural practice and has no religious connection AT ALL -- was already there. Perhaps you've heard of linear time?


Perhaps you'd like to explain to the class how it is that honor killings can be found in India -- among Moslems, among Sikhs, among Hindus -- three religions that have nothing to do with each other -- while the geographic coincidence is.... ummmm.... just a coincidence?

Probably not.

Honor killings have nothing to do with (any) religion-- they have to do with social hierarchy and class and family status and control of women. That was the case in Rome, it's true in India, it's true in Pakistan. None of them have a religion in common.

You just listed three religions that endorse honor killings, and then you say they don't have anything to do with religion. Hinduism is even more backwards and almost as savage as Islam. They have enlightened practices like the cast system, but you think the fact that they both practice honor killings is a defence of Islam? At least the Hindus don't believe they have to spread their vile religion to the rest of the human race and slaughter non-believers.

Claiming honor killings are a cultural practice rather than a religious practice is meaningless because religion is inseparable from culture. It's a large part of what culture is. your attempt to make a distinction between them only shows what an ignoramus you are.


When it started isn't the issue. When it ended is the issue. Christians haven't stoned anyone in 2000 years. Muslims stone people every week. Also, they never stoned anyone in Salem. They hung a few who were accused of being witches. That was 400 years ago. It's pathetic that you can't find anything Christian to compare the atrocities of Islam to unless you go back almost to the Middle Ages. Isn't that a clue to you that Islam is a primitive barbaric religion?

Actually I've been there and I've read the marker. A guy named Giles Corey was "pressed to death" on September 19, 1692. That means they put him under a huge slab, not big enough to kill him, just enough to press him slowly until he died. Kind of makes stoning look merciful.

More of your pig-ignorance.

The bottom line is that they didn't stone anyone, and you said they did. According to your own standard, that makes you "pig ignorant."

Pretty sure they weren't Muslims though. You know what they were?

A mob. Like you and your ignoramic ilk.

Your desperate flailing to apply cultural artifacts and mob mentality to a religion is part of that ignoramitude.

What they were is ignorant and barely civilized. That's a perfect definition of your typical Moslem. You despise such behavior in Christians 400 years ago, but you defend it when Muslims engage in it today. There is no limit to the logical contortions you have to go through to defend Islam. Perhaps that's what gets you so pissed off. You know it's a losing battle.

Intelligent Americans understand that the last thing we need more of these ignorant bloodthirsty barbarians in our country. It's hard to understand how anyone would want more of what they dish out.
 
Bullshit.
Honor killings are common in India among Sikhs and Hindus, which have zero to do with Islam.

"The Assembly notes that whilst so-called “honour crimes” emanate from cultural and not religious roots and are perpetrated worldwide (mainly in patriarchal societies or communities), the majority of reported cases in Europe have been amongst Muslim or migrant Muslim communities... ." OOooops :bye1:

"What Must Be Done
How can this problem be addressed? Immigration, law enforcement, and religious authorities must all be included in education, prevention, and prosecution efforts in the matter of honor killings.

In addition, shelters for battered Muslim girls and women should be established..." ROFL WHAT?

Huh... Now that's a 25,000 word study of "Worldwide Trends in Honor Killings"
and there's not a word about THE WORLD WIDE PROBLEM OF HONOR KILLINGS among NON-Muslims.

My guess is that outside of Islam, it's not a problem.
 
Last edited:
Bullshit.
Honor killings are common in India among Sikhs and Hindus, which have zero to do with Islam.

"The Assembly notes that whilst so-called “honour crimes” emanate from cultural and not religious roots and are perpetrated worldwide (mainly in patriarchal societies or communities), the majority of reported cases in Europe have been amongst Muslim or migrant Muslim communities... ." OOooops :bye1:

Made the crucial part just sliiiiightly bigger so you don't miss it.

Learn to read.

Your own link too. :itsok:
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

ROFLMNAO! I will never tire of watching the Islamist-apologizers and the interests of Islam, being promoted by the Ideological Left.

The irony is simply TOO FUCKIN' SWEET!

I think it is because it proves to a mathematical certain that the Left is a dishonest cluster fuck of unwarranted angst and endless fuckin' need. Which is to say, that they're simply evil.
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

The question wasn't whether they would condone violence if someone attacked their church (which still wouldn't be acceptable). The question was whether violence against someone who insulted Islam was acceptable. That's pretty cut-and-dried. It's never acceptable.

92 strongly agreed and 79 somewhat agreed, which make a total of 171 out of 600 who condoned - 29%.

All you proved is that you're an idiot who can't do simple math or who thinks "somewhat approve" means they don't approve." Here's a clue for you: someone who "somewhat approves" of murder is not someone you want living next door to you.
 
Last edited:
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

ROFLMNAO! I will never tire of watching the Islamist-apologizers and the interests of Islam, being promoted by the Ideological Left.

The irony is simply TOO FUCKIN' SWEET!

I think it is because it proves to a mathematical certain that the Left is a dishonest cluster fuck of unwarranted angst and endless fuckin' need. Which is to say, that they're simply evil.
You're flapping your hillbilly mouth and haven't even looked at the questions asked, and how Brietbart basically twisted and spun the to make things look worse than they are.

Just relax in your ingnorant bigotry.

I'm not aplogizing for enyone, just being accurate, unlike the OP.
 
Bullshit.
Honor killings are common in India among Sikhs and Hindus, which have zero to do with Islam.

"The Assembly notes that whilst so-called “honour crimes” emanate from cultural and not religious roots and are perpetrated worldwide (mainly in patriarchal societies or communities), the majority of reported cases in Europe have been amongst Muslim or migrant Muslim communities... ." OOooops :bye1:

Made the crucial part just sliiiiightly bigger so you don't miss it.

Learn to read.

Your own link too. :itsok:

The stupidity your peddling here is that there is some distinction between religion and culture that matters.
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

The question wasn't whether they would condone violence if someone attacked their church (which still wouldn't be acceptable). The question was whether violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable. That's pretty cut-and-dried. It's never acceptable.

92 strongly agreed and 79 somewhat agreed, which make a total of 171 out of 600 who condoned - 29%.

All you proved is that you're an idiot who can't do simple math or who thinks "somewhat approve" means they don't approve." Here's a clue for you: someone who "somewhat approves" of murder is not someone you want living next door to you.
The question was not "violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable"

The question was " BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE"

The "sometimes" allows for all manner of wiggle room. The wa you want it to read is that it's always acceptable....dumb ass

It's all in the way you interpret it, if 92 out of 600 agree that it's sometimes acceptable, tha means there are different kinds of insults worthy of violent reaction.
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

The question wasn't whether they would condone violence if someone attacked their church (which still wouldn't be acceptable). The question was whether violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable. That's pretty cut-and-dried. It's never acceptable.

92 strongly agreed and 79 somewhat agreed, which make a total of 171 out of 600 who condoned - 29%.

All you proved is that you're an idiot who can't do simple math or who thinks "somewhat approve" means they don't approve." Here's a clue for you: someone who "somewhat approves" of murder is not someone you want living next door to you.
The question was not "violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable"

The question was " BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE"

The "sometimes" allows for all manner of wiggle room. The wa you want it to read is that it's always acceptable....dumb ass

Sorry, turd, but there isn't any wiggle room. It's never acceptable to assault anyone purely because of something they've said. The fact that you think it is sometimes acceptable puts you in the same class as the Muslim savages. You're a barbarian who belongs in a cage.
 
Bullshit.
Honor killings are common in India among Sikhs and Hindus, which have zero to do with Islam.

"The Assembly notes that whilst so-called “honour crimes” emanate from cultural and not religious roots and are perpetrated worldwide (mainly in patriarchal societies or communities), the majority of reported cases in Europe have been amongst Muslim or migrant Muslim communities... ." OOooops :bye1:

Made the crucial part just sliiiiightly bigger so you don't miss it.

Learn to read.

Your own link too. :itsok:

The stupidity your peddling here is that there is some distinction between religion and culture that matters.
Wow.....another brilliant Bripat original.....

No distintion between religion and culture.......amazing
 
For those of you who believe American Muslims don't have the same opinions as those savages overseas, here's a poll to open your eyes:
SHOCK POLL: 51% of US Muslims Want Sharia Law - 25% Okay With Violence Against Infidels - The Gateway Pundit

Religion of Peace —

Dozens of Somali Muslims rallied at the Minnesota State Capital in support of the six Islamists charged with suspicion of trying to join ISIS in April.

Videographer Ami Horowitz went to Minneapolis to talk with Muslim immigrants from Somalia and Saudi Arabia about life in America.

Horowitz asked what they thought of the Mohammad cartoons, Shariah Law and life in t. You might be surprised at their responses – or maybe not.

Many of the immigrants said there should be blasphemy laws in America.

Now this… The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that shows 51% of US Muslims want Sharia Law and 25% say violence is acceptable against infidels. Breitbart.com reported:

“ The Center for Security Policy released a poll Tuesday that should give all Americans pause. The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam. A full majority of 51% “agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.”

“ According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%). …

Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”

A full 25% of those polled agreed that “violence against Americans here in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad.”
You've been had.

The polling results have been spun. Here is the polling informaton that fucked up Center For Security tried to hide between their propagandized video links.

What Breitbart said:
“The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult Islam

What the Poll question was:
"I BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE."

Their startling percentage was 93 out of 600, who strongly agreed that violence would SOMETIMES be acceptable.

Who can interpret that?

What if, in the minds of Muslims, who are constantly harassed in this country, someone attacked their church, is violence sometimes and acceptable response?

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/150612-CSP-Polling-Company-Nationwide-Online-Survey-of-Muslims-Crosstabs1.pdf

The question wasn't whether they would condone violence if someone attacked their church (which still wouldn't be acceptable). The question was whether violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable. That's pretty cut-and-dried. It's never acceptable.

92 strongly agreed and 79 somewhat agreed, which make a total of 171 out of 600 who condoned - 29%.

All you proved is that you're an idiot who can't do simple math or who thinks "somewhat approve" means they don't approve." Here's a clue for you: someone who "somewhat approves" of murder is not someone you want living next door to you.
The question was not "violence against someone who insult Islam was acceptable"

The question was " BELIEVE THAT VIOLENCE AGAINST THOSE THAT INSULT THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD, THE QUR'AN, OR ISLAMIC FAITH IS SOMETIMES ACCEPTABLE"

The "sometimes" allows for all manner of wiggle room. The wa you want it to read is that it's always acceptable....dumb ass

Sorry, turd, but there isn't any wiggle room. It's never acceptable to assault anyone purely because of something they've said. The fact that you think it is sometimes acceptable puts you in the same class as the Muslim savages. You're a barbarian who belongs in a cage.
You're a melodramatic uneducated idiot who thrives on anger, and you've been sucked right into this one
 
57% Of Republicans Say Dismantle Constitution And Make Christianity National Religion

A Public Policy Polling (PPP) national survey conducted between February 20th and February 22nd of Republican voters, found that an astonishing 57 percent of Republicans want to dismantle the Constitution, and establish Christianity as the official national religion. Only 30 percent oppose making Christianity the national religion.

Although the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment clearly states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” GOP voters want to cast aside that provision and impose Christianity as the official American religion.

While a number of red states have passed statutes forbidding the implementation of Islam-based sharia law in their states, Republicans apparently have no misgivings about turning the United States into a Christian theocracy.
57% Of Republicans Say Dismantle Constitution And Make Christianity National Religion
 
57% Of Republicans Say Dismantle Constitution And Make Christianity National Religion

A Public Policy Polling (PPP) national survey conducted between February 20th and February 22nd of Republican voters, found that an astonishing 57 percent of Republicans want to dismantle the Constitution, and establish Christianity as the official national religion. Only 30 percent oppose making Christianity the national religion.

Although the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment clearly states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,” GOP voters want to cast aside that provision and impose Christianity as the official American religion.

While a number of red states have passed statutes forbidding the implementation of Islam-based sharia law in their states, Republicans apparently have no misgivings about turning the United States into a Christian theocracy.
57% Of Republicans Say Dismantle Constitution And Make Christianity National Religion
How about that Bripat?

The majority of Republicans want to overthrow the country and implement a Christian verson of Sharia Law!

See how easy that is?
 

Forum List

Back
Top