Should Bernie Sanders run as Third Party?

Should Bernie Sanders run as a Third Party candidate

  • Yes, the democrat Party is far too moderate

    Votes: 7 50.0%
  • No, he's just holding out until Bloomberg sweetens his offer to drop out

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • AOC VP! Yes we can!

    Votes: 5 35.7%
  • Other

    Votes: 2 14.3%

  • Total voters
    14
Sounds like it makes sense on paper ----- until you factor in the fact that the Duopoly LONG ago set up a barrier to any competition. It even controls the debates, literally.

The last time any third party made a significant showing at all was over a hundred years ago and all Teddy Roosevelt's Progressive Party did was siphon off enough Republican votes to send Woodrow Wilson to the White House with like 42% of the vote.

So in practical terms, there is no such thing as a 'third party'. The Duopoly will not allow it.

Sluggo, you never did have any brains.

{Perot earned 19 percent of the vote in the 1992 presidential election, running against incumbent George H.W. Bush and then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton. It was by far the most successful performance by a third-party candidate in modern American history. Perot was blamed for Bush losing his bid for reelection,}

What was Ross Perot's impact on politics?

AGAIN, Pothead, Perot pulled ZERO electoral votes from Bush, or from Clinton. Even if you take Perot's entire ballot total and split it between Bush and Clinton, the latter still comes out with SIX MILLION MORE VOTES.

Math much?

You're a dumb one sluggo. Perot moved dozens of EC votes from Bush to Clinton, handing Clinton the win. Splitting the vote in states where Bush had a slight lead ensured Clinton took the EC. If you Stalinists had your beloved "popular vote" Bill would have lost.

As I said days ago Pothead -------

--------------------- Link?

Clinton won a plurality of the pop vote, not a majority but way more than Bush or Perot. By the way I think it might be inaccurate to characterize a popular vote system as "Stalinist". Check me on that when you get out of rehab.

Less than Bush plus Perot.

Perot split the vote.

THE 1992 ELECTIONS: DISAPPOINTMENT -- NEWS ANALYSIS An Eccentric but No Joke; Perot's Strong Showing Raises Questions On What Might Have Been, and Might Be

AND, as I already noted when this came up before, if you split Perot's votes between Bush and Clinton, Clinton STILL comes out with not only more votes than Bush but six million more.

Bush was toast by the time he looked at his watch. And he knew it, and he wanted out.
 
The dems will never accept him, he should build a Party around him
The parties have made that impossible.

Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.
 
Bernie has the advantage in Iowa because a caucus is basically a meeting, and socialists love meetings!
 
Sluggo, you never did have any brains.

{Perot earned 19 percent of the vote in the 1992 presidential election, running against incumbent George H.W. Bush and then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton. It was by far the most successful performance by a third-party candidate in modern American history. Perot was blamed for Bush losing his bid for reelection,}

What was Ross Perot's impact on politics?

AGAIN, Pothead, Perot pulled ZERO electoral votes from Bush, or from Clinton. Even if you take Perot's entire ballot total and split it between Bush and Clinton, the latter still comes out with SIX MILLION MORE VOTES.

Math much?

You're a dumb one sluggo. Perot moved dozens of EC votes from Bush to Clinton, handing Clinton the win. Splitting the vote in states where Bush had a slight lead ensured Clinton took the EC. If you Stalinists had your beloved "popular vote" Bill would have lost.

As I said days ago Pothead -------

--------------------- Link?

Clinton won a plurality of the pop vote, not a majority but way more than Bush or Perot. By the way I think it might be inaccurate to characterize a popular vote system as "Stalinist". Check me on that when you get out of rehab.

Less than Bush plus Perot.

Perot split the vote.

THE 1992 ELECTIONS: DISAPPOINTMENT -- NEWS ANALYSIS An Eccentric but No Joke; Perot's Strong Showing Raises Questions On What Might Have Been, and Might Be

AND, as I already noted when this came up before, if you split Perot's votes between Bush and Clinton, Clinton STILL comes out with not only more votes than Bush but six million more.

Bush was toast by the time he looked at his watch. And he knew it, and he wanted out.

Perot was a conservative, he drew no votes from Clinton. He was to the RIGHT of Bush.
 
The dems will never accept him, he should build a Party around him
The parties have made that impossible.

Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.

Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. The party sold the nomination to Little Mike. What are all the AOC creeps going to do when it eventually dawns on them?
 
The dems will never accept him, he should build a Party around him
The parties have made that impossible.

Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.

Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. The party sold the nomination to Little Mike. What are all the AOC creeps going to do when it eventually dawns on them?

As I've told you every time you try this shit, Pothead, I don't have a "party". Why don't I have a party, Pothead?

BECAUSE I DON'T NEED ONE, THAT'S THE FUCK WHY.
 
The dems will never accept him, he should build a Party around him
The parties have made that impossible.

Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.

Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. The party sold the nomination to Little Mike. What are all the AOC creeps going to do when it eventually dawns on them?

As I've told you every time you try this shit, Pothead, I don't have a "party". Why don't I have a party, Pothead?

BECAUSE I DON'T NEED ONE, THAT'S THE FUCK WHY.

You ducked the question, Sluggo. Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. That's just a fact. So what will that do with the troops?
 
If Bernie was 30 years younger then building something around him would be an option. With their weak field of candidates if Bernie can't swing Democrats in the primaries he'd have no chance come this fall of having any impact.
 
2020 is a decency check for America

The heart of America is so much bigger than the heart of the guy in the White House.
 
I hope he does. It would split the vote in the General. Maybe Trump has an obnoxious personality ,but he is doing a good job. Why change?
 
The parties have made that impossible.

Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.

Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. The party sold the nomination to Little Mike. What are all the AOC creeps going to do when it eventually dawns on them?

As I've told you every time you try this shit, Pothead, I don't have a "party". Why don't I have a party, Pothead?

BECAUSE I DON'T NEED ONE, THAT'S THE FUCK WHY.

You ducked the question, Sluggo. Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. That's just a fact. So what will that do with the troops?

No Pothead, it's not a "fact". "Facts" are things that are provably true. What you have there is a random hallucination inspired by the chemical fumes of whatever translucidinious polymer solvent you lusted over thinking "wonder what THAT tastes like". It's got nothing to do with me, wish for it all you like.
 
Will the Marxist faction tear your party to shreds WHEN Bernie is tossed aside for Little Mike, who has already bought the nomination?

I hope so...

What is it with your tiny little mind that obsesses with this dichotomy mentality where everything in the world is made out of two "parties", Pothead? Did you soak your head in intellectual astringent or some shit?

The fact is that WAY more voters have no party at all than affiliate with one of your pathetic two "parties". Get that through your dense cranium.

Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. The party sold the nomination to Little Mike. What are all the AOC creeps going to do when it eventually dawns on them?

As I've told you every time you try this shit, Pothead, I don't have a "party". Why don't I have a party, Pothead?

BECAUSE I DON'T NEED ONE, THAT'S THE FUCK WHY.

You ducked the question, Sluggo. Bolshevik Bernie is going to get fucked by your filthy and shameful party. That's just a fact. So what will that do with the troops?

No Pothead, it's not a "fact". "Facts" are things that are provably true. What you have there is a random hallucination inspired by the chemical fumes of whatever translucidinious polymer solvent you lusted over thinking "wonder what THAT tastes like". It's got nothing to do with me, wish for it all you like.

You may lie a lot sluggo, but GODDAMN aren't you stupid...


Bernie Sanders Supporters Leave Iowa Mock Caucus in Protest

Iowa caucus delays revive concerns and conspiracy theories among Bernie Sanders supporters
 

Forum List

Back
Top