JoeB131
Diamond Member
Calls a murderer a helpless slob. We know what joe is.
Except that a lot of guys sent to Death Row didn't murder anyone, that's the problem.
I notice you didn't even address my essay about Rolando Cruz.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Calls a murderer a helpless slob. We know what joe is.
Why would anyone respond to your lies? You are an America hating pos.Calls a murderer a helpless slob. We know what joe is.
Except that a lot of guys sent to Death Row didn't murder anyone, that's the problem.
I notice you didn't even address my essay about Rolando Cruz.
Why would anyone respond to your lies? You are an America hating pos.
As usual you completly bastardize what is being discussed for your own perverse lie filled agenda.Why would anyone respond to your lies? You are an America hating pos.
No, the America I love doesn't execute innocent people because cops were bad at their jobs. That's kind of the opposite of what America is.
I don't see capital punishment as a deterrent,
As usual you completly bastardize what is being discussed for your own perverse lie filled agenda.
Studies have shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crimes, not murder, not any crime. Criminals don't care. They are stupid. They think they won't get caught.Capital punishment should be a deterrent to crimes such as murder, so yes: It should be instituted.
Many states have also adopted a pre-emptive form of capital punishment with their so-called "Castle Doctrine" or "Deadly Force" laws, allowing legally-armed citizens to use deadly force if necessary to protect their own lives or the lives of their family.
Calls a murderer a helpless slob. We know what joe is.so thanks for adding how you feel
Meh, guy, just pointing out that executing some helpless slob will not make you feel any better about your failed life.
Studies have shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crimes, not murder, not any crime. Criminals don't care. They are stupid. They think they won't get caught.Capital punishment should be a deterrent to crimes such as murder, so yes: It should be instituted.
Many states have also adopted a pre-emptive form of capital punishment with their so-called "Castle Doctrine" or "Deadly Force" laws, allowing legally-armed citizens to use deadly force if necessary to protect their own lives or the lives of their family.
Studies have shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crimes, not murder, not any crime. Criminals don't care. They are stupid. They think they won't get caught.Capital punishment should be a deterrent to crimes such as murder, so yes: It should be instituted.
Many states have also adopted a pre-emptive form of capital punishment with their so-called "Castle Doctrine" or "Deadly Force" laws, allowing legally-armed citizens to use deadly force if necessary to protect their own lives or the lives of their family.
It is a deterrent if you take them out of this world. Nobody has ever come back from the other side, to commit another crime, now have they?
Not a single criminal that I know of.
Studies have shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crimes, not murder, not any crime. Criminals don't care. They are stupid. They think they won't get caught.Capital punishment should be a deterrent to crimes such as murder, so yes: It should be instituted.
Many states have also adopted a pre-emptive form of capital punishment with their so-called "Castle Doctrine" or "Deadly Force" laws, allowing legally-armed citizens to use deadly force if necessary to protect their own lives or the lives of their family.
It is a deterrent if you take them out of this world. Nobody has ever come back from the other side, to commit another crime, now have they?
Not a single criminal that I know of.
Deterrent means to prevent. To deter, keep from happening. Once the murder has been committed, it is impossible to prevent it from happening. Putting the murderer in prison for life will keep it from being repeated. As far as deterring future murderers, the death penalty doesn't do it. Stats show that murderers are not likely to take the death penalty into account before committing murder.
Another factor is putting to death innocent people. It has been done before and is bound to happen again. As a decent society, we should not take the chance of putting innocent people to death.
Studies have shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crimes, not murder, not any crime. Criminals don't care. They are stupid. They think they won't get caught.Capital punishment should be a deterrent to crimes such as murder, so yes: It should be instituted.
Many states have also adopted a pre-emptive form of capital punishment with their so-called "Castle Doctrine" or "Deadly Force" laws, allowing legally-armed citizens to use deadly force if necessary to protect their own lives or the lives of their family.
It is a deterrent if you take them out of this world. Nobody has ever come back from the other side, to commit another crime, now have they?
Not a single criminal that I know of.
Deterrent means to prevent. To deter, keep from happening. Once the murder has been committed, it is impossible to prevent it from happening. Putting the murderer in prison for life will keep it from being repeated. As far as deterring future murderers, the death penalty doesn't do it. Stats show that murderers are not likely to take the death penalty into account before committing murder.
Another factor is putting to death innocent people. It has been done before and is bound to happen again. As a decent society, we should not take the chance of putting innocent people to death.
As usual you completly bastardize what is being discussed for your own perverse lie filled agenda.
Again, in IL, we had a bunch of cases where we let guys off because of police or prosecutor misconduct putting innocent men on death row. It became so bad that a REPUBLICAN governor, George Ryan, decided he had to commute the sentences of 167 people because even he couldn't tell which ones were really, really guilty
Logical Progression: MLK to PETASome people just need killing.
Other than that, my feelings about the death penalty are rather ambiguous. If it's on the books as a form of punishment, use it. If they want to abolish, do so.
Just remember... some people just need killing...
Gorillas Hiding in the Liberal MistCapital punishment for small crimes committed by juveniles would prevent their budding criminal careers from blossoming.
The fact that he's a Republican has no bearing on the issue. He is not a conservative and some Republicans are no better than Democrats.
This post illustrates why we have the 4th, 5th, and 14th Amendments: to safeguard the people from this sort of rightwing fear, ignorance, hate, and stupidity.Gorillas Hiding in the Liberal MistCapital punishment for small crimes committed by juveniles would prevent their budding criminal careers from blossoming.
Punks are regressive mutations to pre-human DNA. Simply simian, missing links that must be chopped off.
Not a lot of people know this, but in the provinces patrolled by the South Korean soldiers in Viet Nam, the Koreans would behead the North Vietnamese soldiers and place them on bamboo poles where they were readily seen by their troops.
The result? The North Vietnamese almost totally avoided incursions into those province areas.
The Koreans absolutely terrified the North Vietnamese.
Our problem as a nation is that we are fractured along political lines, and those who would do us harm see how they can use it to their advantage.
Put tall shiny, gleaming guillotines on every courthouse lawn; announce what they will be used for, and watch the violence levels drop.