Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
therightscoop.com
Is this a trolling question or evidence of Idiocracy? No administration in the history of the great Republic has ever considered removing a Justice for a minority opinion.in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...www.theblaze.com
its what she based her opinion on thats the problem,,Is this a trolling question or evidence of Idiocracy? No administration in the history of the great Republic has ever considered removing a Justice for a minority opinion.
This is not just a minority opinion.Is this a trolling question or evidence of Idiocracy? No administration in the history of the great Republic has ever considered removing a Justice for a minority opinion.
in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...
I read the constitution where it says equal treatment under the law,,And your legal training is what?
in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...
NO!!You can kick and scream all you want, but it's a lifetime appointment, and she's not going to be impeached just because you don't like her decision. I suggest you get over it and go on with your life.
She made more than a decision. She openly challenged constitutional jurisprudence. I dunno.....You can kick and scream all you want, but it's a lifetime appointment, and she's not going to be impeached just because you don't like her decision. I suggest you get over it and go on with your life.
I read the constitution where it says equal treatment under the law,,
cant find anything about what she said her reason was,,,
if theres something I missed please show me??
its her reason of her opinion thats the problem,,If you are referring to the SCOTUS decision today on affirmative action, I agree with it. But that's not reason to remove a Justice.
I was asking about your legal credentials for removing a SCOTUS Justice. Please cite precedent. TIA.
my legal credentials mean nothing,, my ability to read and understanding the meanings of words is all thats needed,,
trying to make it personal without anything of substance on the topic is a very low form of trolling,,
we arent talking about just anyone just saying anything,,View attachment 800051
Sorry. Anyone can spew bullshit about anything.
Unless you have some, you know, actual legal training, then your opinion means shit.
That jabbering lunatic has no business officiating at a traveling carnival hot dog eating contest. She actually out to be a carnie. The insertion of that windoe licker is a devastating blow that will only add aburdity to the court for decades. She makes RBG look like an actual attorney that has read the COTUS.in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...
in her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...
Who judges whether they’re adhering to the constitution?
I could also thank today's Republican's, because their parents and grand parents were those very Democrats.Thank a Democrat for those atrocities next time you're in the voting booth.
If you know what a 3 year old finds out on their own about ****ing GENDER you're already better educated than she is. She sat in congress and told them she would have to get a degree in biology to figure out the simplest sort of coupling that toddlers accomplish with this...we arent talking about just anyone just saying anything,,
we are talking about a member of SCOTUS that violated her oath of office and brought her personal racist ideology into her decision and ignored the constitution she took an oath to protect and defend,,,
OK I have a 6 yr degree from harvard in constitutional law
Plus it's not even rational emoting and hyperbole all over the place. It's like watching some cat lady off her meds screeching at a mannequin for taking her husband.It makes me shudder, how close we always come to a complete ripping away of this nation.
Compare and contrast the conservative arguments with the screeching liberal harpies on the court. No Constitutional arguments, because there are none. Just emoting and hyperbole all over the place.
Embarrassing.
She's the poster child of why affirmative action needed to be abolishedin her dissenting opinion in the affirmative action case she openly dismisses the constitution and states ideology should be the deciding factor in US law.
in my opinion she should resign or be removed.
what say you??
She argued that affirmative action programs are legal and necessary to atone for generational discrimination against black people in America, sins that have never been fully rectified.
"The only way out of this morass—for all of us—is to stare at racial disparity unblinkingly, and then do what evidence and experts tell us is required to level the playing field and march forward together,
Clarence Thomas demolishes Justice Jackson's defense of race-based admissions with blistering response: 'Race-infused world view falls flat at each step' | Blaze Media
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote a blistering opinion supporting the high court's ruling against affirmative action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina.In particular, Thomas extensively rebuffed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent.What did Justice Jackson argue?Though she...
