Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What do you imagine that proves?
Has he consulted with Rosenstein to expand the investigation further? In the letter Rosenstein penned to start the Special Investigator:I'm including on this thread the letter that appointed Muller as special counsel and the scope of Mueller directives stated in that letter.....mindful that Rosenstein IS a Trump appointee.....
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf
Rod Rosenstein’s Letter Appointing Mueller Special Counsel
According to the Acting Attorney General, Mueller must follow 28 CFR 600.4 and in that regulations subsection b specifically states:
(b)Additional jurisdiction. If in the course of his or her investigation the Special Counsel concludes that additional jurisdiction beyond that specified in his or her original jurisdiction is necessary in order to fully investigate and resolve the matters assigned, or to investigate new matters that come to light in the course of his or her investigation, he or she shall consult with the Attorney General, who will determine whether to include the additional matters within the Special Counsel's jurisdiction or assign them elsewhere.
Donald Jr's. e-mails are not evidence of any crime, moron. They are evidence of Americans exercising their Constitutional rights.
More proof you don't understand much of what goes on about you. Rosenstein is the person Mueller must go to in order to expand the investigation. To do so otherwise is a violation of his charter. Sessions will havenothing to do with it.What do you imagine that proves?Has he consulted with Rosenstein to expand the investigation further? In the letter Rosenstein penned to start the Special Investigator:I'm including on this thread the letter that appointed Muller as special counsel and the scope of Mueller directives stated in that letter.....mindful that Rosenstein IS a Trump appointee.....
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf
Rod Rosenstein’s Letter Appointing Mueller Special Counsel
According to the Acting Attorney General, Mueller must follow 28 CFR 600.4 and in that regulations subsection b specifically states:
(b)Additional jurisdiction. If in the course of his or her investigation the Special Counsel concludes that additional jurisdiction beyond that specified in his or her original jurisdiction is necessary in order to fully investigate and resolve the matters assigned, or to investigate new matters that come to light in the course of his or her investigation, he or she shall consult with the Attorney General, who will determine whether to include the additional matters within the Special Counsel's jurisdiction or assign them elsewhere.
I ALREADY posted the above (not in the pretty colors you chose, however) implying that the orange (speaking of pretty colors) buffoon should NOT have pissed off Sessions....
But, at this point, since Mueller is not talking much, it SPECULATION that he is not in FULL compliance with the letter he got from Rosenstein.
Wrong, taking money from foreign governments would be illegal, but simply receiving information is perfectly legal. Once again, all you got is a big nothing burger:Donald Jr's. e-mails are not evidence of any crime, moron. They are evidence of Americans exercising their Constitutional rights.
Not this crap again......
Conspiring with a foreign government to influence an election IS against federal election law....
Stomp your feet, throw your dirty diaper around, have a fit...BUT Donnie-baby is in legal trouble and he dragged Kushner and Manafort in the same pile of poop.
Puhleeze quote the law you imagine they violated, dip stick.Donald Jr's. e-mails are not evidence of any crime, moron. They are evidence of Americans exercising their Constitutional rights.
Not this crap again......
Conspiring with a foreign government to influence an election IS against federal election law....
Stomp your feet, throw your dirty diaper around, have a fit...BUT Donnie-baby is in legal trouble and he dragged Kushner and Manafort in the same pile of poop.
I'm sure there are some esoteric parts that I don't know, but I don't think anyone was considering investigating without plenty of probable cause.
Here's a couple:
1. Since no US bank would lend Trump money because of his several bankruptcy, huge loans were given to him Deutsche Bank; a bank that is currently under investigation (and fined $600 million) after receiving an estimated $10 billion from Russian oligarchs.
The speculation is that the bank is involved in money-laundering within the U.S. and elsewhere.
2. Trump bought a broken down mansion in Florida for $40 million...never even saw it and sold it to a Russian oligarch for $100 million (the oligarch never saw the property either) netting Trump a cool $60 million in his "washing machine" scheme.
I'm including on this thread the letter that appointed Muller as special counsel and the scope of Mueller directives stated in that letter.....mindful that Rosenstein IS a Trump appointee.....
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf
I'm including on this thread the letter that appointed Muller as special counsel and the scope of Mueller directives stated in that letter.....mindful that Rosenstein IS a Trump appointee.....
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3726381/Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.pdf
There is more than enough evidence to launch an investigation. Of course the list of people who have gone missing or died mysteriously before being able to appear and testify about what they know keeps growing. I think the better question might be can we find someone willing to investigate them? Yes. Which is why Mueller and Clinton's lawyers are going after him before he can do it.Can you prove Clinton money laundering?Accusing the innocent (President Donald Trump) in order to protect the guilty (Hillary and Bill Clinton and their money laundering Clinton foundation). It's a very sad day for America.
More proof you don't understand much of what goes on about you. Rosenstein is the person Mueller must go to in order to expand the investigation. To do so otherwise is a violation of his charter. Sessions will havenothing to do with it.
Anyone can see what is going on here.
Of course, "anyone can see what's going on here"....The problem is how right wingers (like you) INTERPRET what's going on.....
Just like Trump says "I" have never declared bankruptcyWhat president trump keeps carefully saying is, ''I have no businesses in Russia, I have no properties in Russia...''There's also the whole Deutsche Bank thing. All evidence in the Russian money laundering case is not protected. It's common knowledge that Trump has loans. Trump says he has no business with Russians. If there's a connection Russia laundered money in a year Trump got a loan, there may be "a fair probability that evidence of a crime may be unconvered." Someone posted that IRS filings can be had without a search warrant, but I dunno.A much stiffer standard for Trump, his supporters would say.I think the question is what does probable cause requireradical right does not understand how warrants work. That is all.What about the 4th protects a person from somebody with subpoena power?
This carefully worded proclamation of his, DOES NOT COVER if there are any connections to the Russians/Kremlin or the gvt's favored Russian Oligarch's purchases IN THE USA of Trump properties or convoluted or disguised loans from them in any country but Russia...or purchases by the Russians of Trump owned properties anywhere outside of Russia...etc and is meant to deceive us....
Wrong, taking money from foreign governments would be illegal, but simply receiving information is perfectly legal. Once again, all you got is a big nothing burger:
I'm sure there are some esoteric parts that I don't know, but I don't think anyone was considering investigating without plenty of probable cause.
Here's a couple:
1. Since no US bank would lend Trump money because of his several bankruptcy, huge loans were given to him Deutsche Bank; a bank that is currently under investigation (and fined $600 million) after receiving an estimated $10 billion from Russian oligarchs.
The speculation is that the bank is involved in money-laundering within the U.S. and elsewhere.
2. Trump bought a broken down mansion in Florida for $40 million...never even saw it and sold it to a Russian oligarch for $100 million (the oligarch never saw the property either) netting Trump a cool $60 million in his "washing machine" scheme.
Sounds like probable cause to me.
Yeah, it is money. It has never been interpreted to mean information.Wrong, taking money from foreign governments would be illegal, but simply receiving information is perfectly legal. Once again, all you got is a big nothing burger:
No,nitwit the law states ANYTHING OF VALUE and that is not just money........
besides all this lame "defending:....what do you right wingers "think" of Donnie-baby's ETHICS???.......LOL
In short, you did a search and couldn't find any law that Trump Jr violated.Puhleeze quote the law you imagine they violated, dip stick.
It would not make any difference....Just stay as stupid as you are....and change your diaper,
