Actually that's not what he said he didn't even imply anyone needed to convince his daughter biden's fuck ups is enough.Poor retard. Even his daughter needs convincing not to vote for Biden. Thoughts & prayers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually that's not what he said he didn't even imply anyone needed to convince his daughter biden's fuck ups is enough.Poor retard. Even his daughter needs convincing not to vote for Biden. Thoughts & prayers.
You need to get away from the cultYour cult fantasies won't hold up in court.
Not according to The Colorado Supreme Court.It's for Congress to decide who did or did not violate section 3 not a state.
That’s the stupidest argument I’ve heard yet. First of all immigrants at the border are not engaged in a violent uprising against our government. Second, Biden is not supporting any lawlessness at the border. He is in charge of enforcement. Third, you are trying way too hard and sounding like a moron in the processBiden is committing insurrection by supporting the invasion at our Southern Border, even importing illegals from Africa. Remove Biden from the ballot, remove all democrats from the ballot
The federal government. You just said it was to control the state government. But what the section in question is for is to control the candidates eligible to run for officeHow in the fuck is it false? Why in the fuck was the purpose of the 14th amendment? It wasn't to control the federal government. You dumbfuck stop parroting democrat media propaganda.
Ok, under what grounds. What will their justification be?And the supreme court will come to the conclusion you're wrong. Colorado had no authority
The Colorado supreme court is politically motivated they ruled incorrectlyNot according to The Colorado Supreme Court.
And numerous other states will now follow.
Ultimately The SCOTUS will have to rule that yes, these states have not only the right but the responsibility to administer elections on their own terms.
It's what The U.S. Constitution says.
I'm right the 14th amendment was created to control the states to forced them to make sure all citizens rights are protected. The section in question doesn't supercede section 5. Section 4 doesn't give a green light to the states it doesn't give them jurdiction over federal mattersThe federal government. You just said it was to control the state government. But what the section in question is for is to control the candidates eligible to run for office
Colorado has no juridiction over federal matters no insurrection occured in ColoradoOk, under what grounds. What will their justification be?
You have no idea about the political motivations of the judges, you’re just talking out of your ass. They wrote opinions with solid legal basis on both sides of the argument. Nothing outrageous is going onThe Colorado supreme court is politically motivated they ruled incorrectly
Hell they even stayed their ruling
Well that’s an interesting point. So do you think the actions Texas is taking to secure their border are unconstitutional?I'm right the 14th amendment was created to control the states to forced them to make sure all citizens rights are protected. The section in question doesn't supercede section 5. Section 4 doesn't give a green light to the states it doesn't give them jurdiction over federal matters
Whose in charge of immigration even if a border state feels like they are being invaded?
According to The MAGAt cult anybody who isn't one of your cultists and who follows the law and rules against Trump is "politically motivated."The Colorado supreme court is politically motivated they ruled incorrectly
Hell they even stayed their ruling
Trump engaged in treasonous insurrection.I'm right the 14th amendment was created to control the states to forced them to make sure all citizens rights are protected. The section in question doesn't supercede section 5. Section 4 doesn't give a green light to the states it doesn't give them jurdiction over federal matters
Whose in charge of immigration even if a border state feels like they are being invaded?
Section 5 simply gives Congress the right to enforce the provisions of the 14th amendment via legislation. So what legislation can you point to that restricts CO from doing what they did?I'm right the 14th amendment was created to control the states to forced them to make sure all citizens rights are protected. The section in question doesn't supercede section 5. Section 4 doesn't give a green light to the states it doesn't give them jurdiction over federal matters
Whose in charge of immigration even if a border state feels like they are being invaded?
And according to you cultist of the democrat party Biden did nothing wrong and Trump colluded with RussiaAccording to The MAGAt cult anybody who isn't one of your cultists and who follows the law and rules against Trump is "politically motivated."
This particular snowflake whiny complaint has grown so old now it is laughable.
It's basically now just Trump vs. the ENTIRE world....and you guys being the dutiful, devoted sheeple that you are continue to make fools of yourself trying to keep insisting that the rest of the world is lying...and ONLY Trump...the documented pathological liar, is being truthful.
Think about how ridiculous that is.
Co didn’t tray me criminally charge Trump with insurrection. So in that aspect you are correct. They do have jurisdiction over their elections and ballot eligibility standards. They found that Trump did not meet those standards based on what the US constitution says.Colorado has no juridiction over federal matters no insurrection occured in Colorado
Colorado is so politically motivated they stayed their ruling. What court other than a politically motivated one does that?You have no idea about the political motivations of the judges, you’re just talking out of your ass. They wrote opinions with solid legal basis on both sides of the argument. Nothing outrageous is going on
You're so unhinged what you wrote makes no senseCo didn’t tray me criminally charge Trump with insurrection. So in that aspect you are correct. They do have jurisdiction over their elections and ballot eligibility standards. They found that Trump did not meet those standards based on what the US constitution says.
Jack Smith is handling the criminal side of the matter in federal court
One that understands the political implications of the decisionColorado is so politically motivated they stayed their ruling. What court other than a politically motivated one does that?