Should The Rich Be Required To Pay Higher Taxes In the US?

[bripat9643]

YOU ARE ONTO SOMETHING THERE.


ALL REPUBLICANS SHOULD ENLIST IN THE MILITARY AND GO TO AFPAK


ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD GO TO VENEZUELA.

THEN THE US WILL AGAIN BE THE LIBERTARIAN PARADISE THE FOUNDING FATHERS ENVISIONED.

YEP, THAT'S THE TICKET.

Libertarians fetishists. The Founders TRIED that thing called the Articles of Confederation (strong state rights over federal Gov't) and yet somehow chose to change to the Constitution (strong fed Gov't). Weird right?

DINGLEBERRY, SAH


THE CONSTITUTION CREATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OVER A FEW SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED POWERS - IE, COMMERCE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND THE INDIAN TRIBES - ANY TRANSACTIONS DEALING WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS


THAT'S IS IT, FOLKS.


ANYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN USURPED.


.


.

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

Yes it has. SCOTUS is just a tool of the government. The idea that it would ever rule against in increase in Federal Power is virtually incomprehensible.

Weird the Founders used the 3rd branch then right? lol

What choice did they have once it was established?

 

[Contumacious]

I think everyone who registers as a Democrats should pay a federal income tax rate of 50% since what they advocate for everyone else.

Then every Republucan should enlist in the military. That is what they advocate for everyone else

YOU ARE ONTO SOMETHING THERE.


ALL REPUBLICANS SHOULD ENLIST IN THE MILITARY AND GO TO AFPAK


ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD GO TO VENEZUELA.

THEN THE US WILL AGAIN BE THE LIBERTARIAN PARADISE THE FOUNDING FATHERS ENVISIONED.

YEP, THAT'S THE TICKET.

Libertarians fetishists. The Founders TRIED that thing called the Articles of Confederation (strong state rights over federal Gov't) and yet somehow chose to change to the Constitution (strong fed Gov't). Weird right?

DINGLEBERRY, SAH


THE CONSTITUTION CREATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OVER A FEW SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED POWERS - IE, COMMERCE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND THE INDIAN TRIBES - ANY TRANSACTIONS DEALING WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS


THAT'S IS IT, FOLKS.


ANYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN USURPED.


.


.

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

YEP, FOR GENERATIONS.


.

 

[Dad2three]

I think everyone who registers as a Democrats should pay a federal income tax rate of 50% since what they advocate for everyone else.

"I think"

No you don't!

EVERYONE? Or to go back to the rates that had the top 1/10th of 1% paying 60%+ EFFECTIVE rates 1945-1980? I mean the "job creators" at the top 1/10th of 1% has only tripled their share of income since 1980 WHILE gutting their effective tax rates by about half. Nothing wrong there right? lol

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I think everyone who registers as a Democrats should pay a federal income tax rate of 50% since what they advocate for everyone else.

Then every Republucan should enlist in the military. That is what they advocate for everyone else

Maybe I missed something because this is my first day here. But what Republicans ever advocated everybody enlist in our military?

 

[Dad2three]

Then every Republucan should enlist in the military. That is what they advocate for everyone else

YOU ARE ONTO SOMETHING THERE.


ALL REPUBLICANS SHOULD ENLIST IN THE MILITARY AND GO TO AFPAK


ALL DEMOCRATS SHOULD GO TO VENEZUELA.

THEN THE US WILL AGAIN BE THE LIBERTARIAN PARADISE THE FOUNDING FATHERS ENVISIONED.

YEP, THAT'S THE TICKET.

Libertarians fetishists. The Founders TRIED that thing called the Articles of Confederation (strong state rights over federal Gov't) and yet somehow chose to change to the Constitution (strong fed Gov't). Weird right?

DINGLEBERRY, SAH


THE CONSTITUTION CREATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OVER A FEW SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED POWERS - IE, COMMERCE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND THE INDIAN TRIBES - ANY TRANSACTIONS DEALING WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS


THAT'S IS IT, FOLKS.


ANYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN USURPED.


.


.

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

YEP, FOR GENERATIONS.


.

MORE opinions from the side that has historically been on the wrong side of history about 90%+ of the time. Thanks anyways

 

[bripat9643]

I think everyone who registers as a Democrats should pay a federal income tax rate of 50% since what they advocate for everyone else.

"I think"

No you don't!

EVERYONE? Or to go back to the rates that had the top 1/10th of 1% paying 60%+ EFFECTIVE rates 1945-1980? I mean the "job creators" at the top 1/10th of 1% has only tripled their share of income since 1980 WHILE gutting their effective tax rates by about half. Nothing wrong there right? lol

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

'

Your claims about effective tax rates are entirely unsubstantiated. What is the source of the data for the graphs? I'm sure once we learn that it will be obvious that's it's totally made up.

 

[Wry Catcher]

You go first the IRS accepts donations

Spoken by a pure purse leech (isn't word of the day wonderful!?).

 

[Dad2three]

The "rich" already pay the vast bulk of taxes.

BZZZ wrong. You mean the top 10% who TAKE almost 50% of federal income pay about 70% of federal INCOME taxes which is less than 50% of federal revenues?

 

[bripat9643]

You go first the IRS accepts donations

Spoken by a pure purse leech (isn't word of the day wonderful!?).

What's a "purse leech?" Is that someone who pays his own way and doesn't get handouts from the government?

 

[Dad2three]

Libertarians fetishists. The Founders TRIED that thing called the Articles of Confederation (strong state rights over federal Gov't) and yet somehow chose to change to the Constitution (strong fed Gov't). Weird right?

DINGLEBERRY, SAH


THE CONSTITUTION CREATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OVER A FEW SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED POWERS - IE, COMMERCE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND THE INDIAN TRIBES - ANY TRANSACTIONS DEALING WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS


THAT'S IS IT, FOLKS.


ANYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN USURPED.


.


.

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

Yes it has. SCOTUS is just a tool of the government. The idea that it would ever rule against in increase in Federal Power is virtually incomprehensible.

Weird the Founders used the 3rd branch then right? lol

What choice did they have once it was established?

THEY established it right?

 

[Contumacious]

I think everyone who registers as a Democrats should pay a federal income tax rate of 50% since what they advocate for everyone else.

"I think"

No you don't!

EVERYONE? Or to go back to the rates that had the top 1/10th of 1% paying 60%+ EFFECTIVE rates 1945-1980? I mean the "job creators" at the top 1/10th of 1% has only tripled their share of income since 1980 WHILE gutting their effective tax rates by about half. Nothing wrong there right? lol

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

MR FUCKTARD

YOU ARE CONVENIENTLY IGNORING THE FACT THAT OUR CRIMINAL LEGISLATORS USE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD TO INFLATE THE CURRENCY THEREBY LEVYING AN INDIRECT TAX.


NO, I AM PLANNING TO STAY HERE, MAKE SURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS RESTORED AND THEN ENFORCED AND THE CRIMINALLY INSANE LIKE YOURSELF IS PROPERLY EXECUTED.


.

 

[Dad2three]

You go first the IRS accepts donations

Spoken by a pure purse leech (isn't word of the day wonderful!?).

What's a "purse leech?" Is that someone who pays his own way and doesn't get handouts from the government?

Nah, that would be a conservative, the type who wants to run up the credit card for someone else to pay later!

 

[bripat9643]

DINGLEBERRY, SAH


THE CONSTITUTION CREATED A STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT OVER A FEW SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED POWERS - IE, COMMERCE WITH FOREIGN NATIONS AND THE INDIAN TRIBES - ANY TRANSACTIONS DEALING WITH FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS


THAT'S IS IT, FOLKS.


ANYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN USURPED.


.


.

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

Yes it has. SCOTUS is just a tool of the government. The idea that it would ever rule against in increase in Federal Power is virtually incomprehensible.

Weird the Founders used the 3rd branch then right? lol

What choice did they have once it was established?

THEY established it right?

What's your point, moron?

 

[Dad2three]

"I think"

No you don't!

EVERYONE? Or to go back to the rates that had the top 1/10th of 1% paying 60%+ EFFECTIVE rates 1945-1980? I mean the "job creators" at the top 1/10th of 1% has only tripled their share of income since 1980 WHILE gutting their effective tax rates by about half. Nothing wrong there right? lol

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

MR FUCKTARD

YOU ARE CONVENIENTLY IGNORING THE FACT THAT OUR CRIMINAL LEGISLATORS USE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD TO INFLATE THE CURRENCY THEREBY LEVYING AN INDIRECT TAX.


NO, I AM PLANNING TO STAY HERE, MAKE SURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS RESTORED AND THEN ENFORCED AND THE CRIMINALLY INSANE LIKE YOURSELF IS PROPERLY EXECUTED.


.

Oh a nuttjobber antiFed.. Name the nation without a federal reserve? Oops

 

[Dad2three]

Oh so the SCOTUS has been wrong for generations? lol

Yes it has. SCOTUS is just a tool of the government. The idea that it would ever rule against in increase in Federal Power is virtually incomprehensible.

Weird the Founders used the 3rd branch then right? lol

What choice did they have once it was established?

THEY established it right?

What's your point, moron?

YOU said

"What choice did they have once it was established?"

Can't EVER be honest huh Bubba?

 

[bripat9643]

You go first the IRS accepts donations

Spoken by a pure purse leech (isn't word of the day wonderful!?).

What's a "purse leech?" Is that someone who pays his own way and doesn't get handouts from the government?

Nah, that would be a conservative, the type who wants to run up the credit card for someone else to pay later!

Democrats are the ones running up the credit card, or do you imagine that Republicans created all those vast spending programs?

 

[bripat9643]

Yes it has. SCOTUS is just a tool of the government. The idea that it would ever rule against in increase in Federal Power is virtually incomprehensible.

Weird the Founders used the 3rd branch then right? lol

What choice did they have once it was established?

THEY established it right?

What's your point, moron?

YOU said

"What choice did they have once it was established?"

Can't EVER be honest huh Bubba?

Yes, I did say that. So?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Due to the enormous corruption and cronyism in our federal government, many wealthy use their expensive lawyers to get out of paying taxes. The current tax code is 70k pages...time for a change.

Let's go to a simple flat tax. That would eliminate the political class' efforts to enrich their donors/owners.

Damn, you really don't get it. A simple flat tax allows a middle class family to keep approximately $45,000 and a professional baseball player making the major league minimum a little over $450,000; and Mitt Romney, Soros, gates billions - in ten years we would have two classes, the very very rich and the rest of us.

Simple solutions to complex issues are rarely thought out, pragmatic or viable, especially in a nation of the people, by the people and for the people.

 

[bripat9643]

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

MR FUCKTARD

YOU ARE CONVENIENTLY IGNORING THE FACT THAT OUR CRIMINAL LEGISLATORS USE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD TO INFLATE THE CURRENCY THEREBY LEVYING AN INDIRECT TAX.


NO, I AM PLANNING TO STAY HERE, MAKE SURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS RESTORED AND THEN ENFORCED AND THE CRIMINALLY INSANE LIKE YOURSELF IS PROPERLY EXECUTED.


.

Oh a nuttjobber antiFed.. Name the nation without a federal reserve? Oops

WE didn't have one until 1914.

The Federal Reserve was created to the government could loot American citizens.

 

[Contumacious]

The marginal rate in those days was 95%. However, the effective rate was much much lower, probably no worse than today.

You keep lying even when shown REAL facts. Weird

YOU DO KNOW WHAT EFFECTIVE MEANS RIGHT?

OF COURSE I DO.


FROM A FEDERAL BUREAUCRAT STANDPOINT "EFFECTIVE" TAX RATE IS 100% CONFISCATION.


Next question, please.


.

So NO, you can't back up the posit that tax rates paid, EFFECTIVE, are about what they were. Even if I showed they dropped DRAMATICALLY as the share going to the top has tripled. Thanks anyways

We live with a Gov't that allows US to elect leaders who make LAWS. If you don't like it, try Honduras or Somalia?

MR FUCKTARD

YOU ARE CONVENIENTLY IGNORING THE FACT THAT OUR CRIMINAL LEGISLATORS USE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD TO INFLATE THE CURRENCY THEREBY LEVYING AN INDIRECT TAX.


NO, I AM PLANNING TO STAY HERE, MAKE SURE THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS RESTORED AND THEN ENFORCED AND THE CRIMINALLY INSANE LIKE YOURSELF IS PROPERLY EXECUTED.


.

Oh a nuttjobber antiFed.. Name the nation without a federal reserve? Oops

OH, A NUTJOB SOCIALIST , ANTI-CONSTITUTION,

NAME THE NATION WHICH WILL SURVIVE AN ECONOMIC UPHEAVAL.

.