Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You didn’t answer my question. None of their publications agree with her. None of the places that Lindzen workEd At agree with him. He’s 80 plus. He writes opinions that no one agrees with. He’s senile, like you. What they do now is post drivel, like you .Sure...
Judith Curry is President and co-founder of Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN). She is Professor Emerita at the Georgia Institute of Technology, where she served as Chair of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences for 13 years.
Judith Curry - Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN)
There are many many climates. Did you explain that to your scientist institutions?No it is not bubba. CLIMATE is not weather Or course you could post a science dictionary derived meaning of each and compare…but you’re afraid.
You lie far too much.You didn’t answer my question. None of their publications agree with her. None of the places that Lindzen workEd At agree with him. He’s 80 plus. He rights opinions that no one agrees with. He’s senile, like you. What they do now is post drivel, like you .
Okay I had decided your trolling wasn't worth responding to. But even you could not be that ignorant.Show it ! All he does is write articles. NONE is a climate research trial, nothing, none.
So what is he doing NOW ?
You can’t be serious. Maybe your pilots license makes you an expert on nuclear energy ? Nah,Trump mentioned using Nuclear blasts to try to control hurricanes. But the same bozos arguing with you and me laughed at this as nonsense. So they have but one so called solution.
Attack in heavy handed mesures a gas that is the life gas of planet Earth. CO2 is why men and plants are here to begin with.
Since one more time you attack the professor of climatology,Show it ! All he does is write articles. NONE is a climate research trial, nothing, none.
So what is he doing NOW ?
For a variety of inter-related cultural, organizational, and political reasons, progress in climate science and the actual solution of scientific problems in this field have moved at a much slower rate than would normally be possible. Not all these factors are unique to climate science, but the heavy influence of politics has served to amplify the role of the other factors. Such factors as the change in the scientific paradigm from a dialectic opposition between theory and observation to an emphasis on simulation and observational programs, the inordinate growth of administration in universities and the consequent increase in importance of grant overhead, and the hierarchical nature of formal scientific organizations are cosidered. This paper will deal with the origin of the cultural changes and with specific examples of the operation and interaction of these factors. In particular, we will show how political bodies act to control scientific institutions, how scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions, and how opposition to these positions is disposed of.
I never posted a single word that says I want to fire off nuclear blasts to control hurricanes. And all Trump did was ask a question by a non nuclear expert.You can’t be serious. Maybe your pilots license makes you an expert on nuclear energy ? Nah,
You’re hilarious. Nuclear tests are done in the most benign of weather cinditions to diminish the dispersion of RADIATION POISONING Foolish. And you and Trump want to drop them in storms. What foolishness.
Trump was the fucking president of the United States when he asked that question. He's got fucking top notch science advice available to him on a moment's notice. When he asks something like that to the press, he's saying "I think it'd be a good idea if we [fill-in-the-blank]" If he didn't know that would be the effect, maybe he shouldn't have been sitting in that office.I never posted a single word that says I want to fire off nuclear blasts to control hurricanes. And all Trump did was ask a question by a non nuclear expert.
I see why your arguments are so feeble. I could explain them but why bother?
Trump did not propose using nuclear weapons to control hurricanes or anything else. He asked why can't we do that which is his way of asking "could we do that?" or maybe "What would happen if we did that?" It was a question to get information, not to suggest policy.Trump mentioned using Nuclear blasts to try to control hurricanes. But the same bozos arguing with you and me laughed at this as nonsense. So they have but one so called solution.
Attack in heavy handed mesures a gas that is the life gas of planet Earth. CO2 is why men and plants are here to begin with.
Trump is not a slick, polished, scripted, carefully crafted and groomed politician. He's a guy fully aware of what he doesn't know and he asks a LOT of questions according to his friends, staffers, colleagues.Trump was the fucking president of the United States when he asked that question. He's got fucking top notch science advice available to him on a moment's notice. When he asks something like that to the press, he's saying "I think it'd be a good idea if we [fill-in-the-blank]" If he didn't know that would be the effect, maybe he shouldn't have been sitting in that office.
Oh... perfect.Trump is not a slick, polished, scripted, carefully crafted and groomed politician.
Then why didn't he ask his science advisor? Of, if he did, why didn't he accept his answer?He's a guy fully aware of what he doesn't know and he asks a LOT of questions according to his friends, staffers, colleagues.
You mean he's not woke. He's not aware or attentive to important societal facts and issues. Got it.He also refuses to be put into an intellectual box that orders a PC 'woke' mandated point of view.
Name one out-of-the-box, SUCCESSFUL solution he came up with during his term that others had not thought of or had dismissed - for any reason.One of his strongest abilities is the ability to think outside the box and look for solutions to things that others might never think of or had already dismissed as 'impossible'.
What was the context of his let's-drop-nukes-on-hurricanes conjecture that excuses him from having revealed the United States was being ruled by a complete imbecile?And his political enemies will take his comments out of their full and intended context and twist them into something he never intended which is what you just did here.
That is true and it's also why I said mentioned. I did not say it was an actual proposal.Trump did not propose using nuclear weapons to control hurricanes or anything else. He asked why can't we do that which is his way of asking "could we do that?" or maybe "What would happen if we did that?" It was a question to get information, not to suggest policy.
Severe weather such as hurricanes will typically greatly alarm those in danger. Trump was the president. Who do you think he was asking the question? By the time he got to his desk, his advisers would have advised him. Anyway, if you seriously plan to have man control climate, what would you do to manage global climate? When I read that man should or can control climate, now you know what I am thinking when reading those crazy solutions.Trump was the fucking president of the United States when he asked that question. He's got fucking top notch science advice available to him on a moment's notice. When he asks something like that to the press, he's saying "I think it'd be a good idea if we [fill-in-the-blank]" If he didn't know that would be the effect, maybe he shouldn't have been sitting in that office.
Have a nice day Crick. When you can actually read and comprehend and discuss what is being debated get back to me.Oh... perfect.
SLICK:
1
a
: having a smooth surface : SLIPPERY
slick wet leaves
b
: having surface plausibility or appeal : GLOSSY
slick advertising
c
: based on stereotype : TRITE
slick stories soon forgotten
2
a
: characterized by subtlety or nimble wit : CLEVER
especially : WILY
a slick swindler
b
: DEFT, SKILLFUL
a slick ballplayer
3
: extremely good : FIRST-RATE
POLISHED:
1
: subjected to polishing : made smooth and glossy by or as if by polishing
a polished surface
polished silver
2
: characterized by a high degree of development, finish, or refinement : free from imperfections
a polished performance/performer
a highly polished piece of writing
3
somewhat old-fashioned : characterized by elegance and refinement
a polished gentleman
polished society
CRAFTED:
1
: skill in planning, making, or executing : DEXTERITY
"We have not the strength with which to fight this man; we must … win, if win we can, by craft."—Jack London
2
a
: an occupation, trade, or activity requiring manual dexterity or artistic skill
the carpenter's craft
the craft of writing plays
crafts such as pottery, carpentry, and sewing
He learned the craft as an apprentice.
b
crafts plural : articles made by craftspeople
a store selling crafts
a crafts fair
3
: skill in deceiving to gain an end
used craft and guile to close the deal
4
: the members of a trade or trade association
But you think he should occupy the most powerful office on the planet.
Then why didn't he ask his science advisor? Of, if he did, why didn't he accept his answer?
You mean he's not woke. He's not aware or attentive to important societal facts and issues. Got it.
Name one out-of-the-box, SUCCESSFUL solution he came up with during his term that others had not thought of or had dismissed - for any reason.
What was the context of his let's-drop-nukes-on-hurricanes conjecture that excuses him from having revealed the United States was being ruled by a complete imbecile?
Robert brought up Trump and his nukes-for-hurricanes query talking with Dagosa. You jumped in to defend Trump. I jumped in to correct your misperceptions re Trump; an important issue at this point in time. See you on down the road, Jack.Have a nice day Crick. When you can actually read and comprehend and discuss what is being debated get back to me.
If you had done that I wouldn't have criticized your response as non sequitur nonsense. I don't defend Trump. He doesn't need my defense. I do correct the indecent, evil, hateful, deliberately malicious crap that dishonest people accuse him of or misrepresent that he said.Robert brought up Trump and his nukes-for-hurricanes query talking with Dagosa. You jumped in to defend Trump. I jumped in to correct your misperceptions re Trump; an important issue at this point in time. See you on down the road, Jack.
Geesus, it doesn’t take an expert in nuclear energy to know anything about the results of a nuclear blast…especially if you’re the Fking commander in chief. And you’re humping for this buffoon ?I never posted a single word that says I want to fire off nuclear blasts to control hurricanes. And all Trump did was ask a question by a non nuclear expert.
I see why your arguments are so feeble. I could explain them but why bother?
You can’t name one item that he’s been official accused of that isn’t as a result of a plethora of evidence. GEESUS, you‘d have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see it…..you got a mirror handy ?I do correct the indecent, evil, hateful, deliberately malicious crap that dishonest people accuse him of or misrepresent that he said.
Oh, you’re so put upon. Maybe Trump has another crying towel you could borrow.,Not everybody. Just the most dishonest and stupid ones.
