alang1216
Pragmatist
- Jun 21, 2014
- 24,805
- 5,998
If you think a complete criminal background check is a reasonable precaution, it should be done at the time the voter first registers. Thereafter, should a person become ineligible to vote, for whatever reason, a note to that effect would be placed in the voter database. When that voter attempts to vote, the database is checked and the voter is turned away. There is no need to do a complete criminal background check for every election, just keep the database current.No....not registering.....a complete criminal background check, the same used to buy a gun......and if you don't get the background check done, you don't vote....I don't know where you're from but I registered to vote and they keep a list of eligible voters they check when I go to vote. Seems reasonable and doesn't interfere with my right to vote. So what's the problem with gun registration again?In most states it is against the law for felons to vote. So...according to the policies of the democrat party, who want gun control background checks before the exercise of the 2nd Amendment Right to Keep and Bear Arms to make sure that felons don't buy guns.......should we require that all citizens who want to vote pass a criminal background check before they vote in each election?
Again, in most states, felons can't vote...so a background check is necessary to make sure they don't vote...dittos illegal aliens, who are essentially breaking the law by being in the country illegally.
As the anti-gunners tell us.....background checks don't keep people from buying guns, so what is the big deal....so what would be the big deal if background checks were required to vote?
Considering the damage votes can do to a country, it is just common sense...right?