Slut Or Not??

And I live in New Mexico where casino gambling is legal on Indian reservations or at the State fairgrounds only. Those are easily accessible to those of us who live in the western and northern part of the state--three casinos right here in Albuquerque or abutting Albuquerque and several others within easy driving distance-- not so accessible to those on the eastern side of the state.

Of note, in the west and north, in the the Gambler's Anonymous attendance has quadrupled since gambling was legalized in the state and you can take it to the bank that for every person in that program, there are ten others who need to be. Little difference is noted in the east where casino gambling is not so easily accessible.

I have no attraction to gambling whatsoever, even if there were 10 casinoes next to my house I wouldn't gamble, I don't like losing money. When I was stationed at Vandenberg they had the Chumash Casino about half hour from the base, I would go down there from time to time but didn't gamble anything.

I used to really enjoy going to Vegas and Laughlin and did often stop in at the local casinos once they opened up. But I never lost more than what I had budgeted for recreation and it was never a problem for me. It lost its allure though when one of our beloved family members did get hopelessly hooked, lost everythng he and his family had, and compromised his health so that he most likely died years earlier than he otherwise would have. Gambling just wasn't any fun for me after that.

I'm sorry to hear that.
 
LMAO!

That normal left to us by ancient camel herders who believed in witchcraft and thought the earth was flat

The Republicans are war mongers and cut taxes for the corporations and the wealthy. Why is it that the bible is so important to them about social issues but completely ignored when spending and the military are front burner issues. When are we going to turn our swords into plowshares and spears into pruninghooks......then study war no more

More middle class taxpayers benefited from the Bush tax cuts than the wealthy by far. Many were taken off the tax roles for federal income taxes completely and now only 50.7% of taxpayers pay federal income tax.

Yeah...ordinary Joe a six pack a week. Million dollar bill a new Mercedes. Who are you trying to schit:

3-27-08tax2-f2.jpg



income-distribution-chart.png

The part I noticed what that the bottom tier's wages completly stagnated while the upper 1% made the shitload of dollars you mentioned.

Reagan and Bush41 cut taxes, borrowed from foreign banks and quadrupled the national debt from less than $1 trillion to more than $4 trillion.

Bill Clinton raised taxes in 1993-1994 while he still had a Democratic congress, balanced the annual budget and actually had the whole thing on course to completely pay off the total national debt. You know what....the goddam Republican party is so hell bent on low taxes at the top that George W. Bush took over that surplus, cut taxes twice using reconciliation to block Democratic opposition and proceeded to double the debt again. Is it that hard for you to fathom Maybe you need a picture:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
 
How many people are we willing to sacrifice for the privilege of dictating to others what they can put in their mouths or their veins?.




How much of society are you willing to sacrifice to indulge the poor impulse control of a minority of dangerous losers?
 
There are none. Get on that Merry-Go-Round and it'll never end.

A man sees a pretty woman, takes her to a $200 dinner, she feels grateful and gives him head.

Who is the victim?

Or they skip the charade, he hands her $200, she gives him head, who is the victim?



Both of them, but mostly the woman (and all the other women - and girls - who will be beaten, addicted, trafficked, raped, and killed in the process of dehumanization that your little transaction represents).
 
33 advertisers has dropped rush.

The majority is Behind Sandra.



OP is a slut, tbqh. (Using Rush's logic, of course)

Democrats love sex and brag about it
.Republicans love sex and lie about it

Primetime Live Poll: More Republicans Satisfied With Sex Lives Than Democrats - ABC News
The poll analysis includes a breakdown by many subgroups, including region, age and even political party affiliation, which is the topic of results released today:


Of those involved in a committed relationship, who is very satisfied with their relationship?

Republicans -- 87 percent; Democrats -- 76 percent

Who is very satisfied with their sex life?

Republicans -- 56 percent; Democrats -- 47 percent

The poll analysis also reveals who has worn something sexy to enhance their sex life:
Republicans -- 72 percent; Democrats -- 62 percent

When asked whether they had ever faked an orgasm, more Democrats (33 percent) than Republicans (26 percent) said they had.​
 
33 advertisers has dropped rush.

The majority is Behind Sandra.



OP is a slut, tbqh. (Using Rush's logic, of course)

Democrats love sex and brag about it
.Republicans love sex and lie about it

Primetime Live Poll: More Republicans Satisfied With Sex Lives Than Democrats - ABC News
The poll analysis includes a breakdown by many subgroups, including region, age and even political party affiliation, which is the topic of results released today:


Of those involved in a committed relationship, who is very satisfied with their relationship?

Republicans -- 87 percent; Democrats -- 76 percent

Who is very satisfied with their sex life?

Republicans -- 56 percent; Democrats -- 47 percent

The poll analysis also reveals who has worn something sexy to enhance their sex life:
Republicans -- 72 percent; Democrats -- 62 percent

When asked whether they had ever faked an orgasm, more Democrats (33 percent) than Republicans (26 percent) said they had.​

Isn't that a hoot. Is this what you do all day long? Speculate about other people sex lives?
 
Caught in the vice of a bunch of permanent employees for a right wing rag. How much worse can it get
 
Both of them, but mostly the woman (and all the other women - and girls - who will be beaten, addicted, trafficked, raped, and killed in the process of dehumanization that your little transaction represents).

How is she a "victim" when she voluntarily engages in the activity? That makes no sense. No one was hurt, everyone got what they wanted. The transaction had less affect on the health of either participant than buying a McDonald's greaseburger.

The ONLY argument you have is that you morally object to their behavior - which begs the question of who put you in charge?
 
Both of them, but mostly the woman (and all the other women - and girls - who will be beaten, addicted, trafficked, raped, and killed in the process of dehumanization that your little transaction represents).

How is she a "victim" when she voluntarily engages in the activity? That makes no sense. No one was hurt, everyone got what they wanted. The transaction had less affect on the health of either participant than buying a McDonald's greaseburger.

The ONLY argument you have is that you morally object to their behavior - which begs the question of who put you in charge?

If she's gone out with you, she's in trouble.
 

Forum List

Back
Top