Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
- Feb 8, 2011
- 110,434
- 39,503
don't worry, scumbag.. gorsuch will defend your right to be an inferior asshole bigot.
It's good I'll have the right, but why would I WANT to be you?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
don't worry, scumbag.. gorsuch will defend your right to be an inferior asshole bigot.
Not gonna happen, you know...the overturning of Roe v. Wade.Who denies that it's precedent? It's bad precedent, but that doesn't make it less precedent.
The beauty of having Gorsuch on the supreme court is we are one spot closer to overturning bad precedent
Not till we get a court packed with originalists
An originalist interpretation of the Constitution in no way give fetuses personhood.
Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
Seig Heil! Adolph!
Hitler, like you, was a BIG fan of abortion. He wanted to slaughter ALL the inferiors.
Somebody better go look up what precedent means. In this case yes RvW is precedent. As were many laws right up until they changed. Five of nine SC judges can make a new precedent with a single ruling throwing out the old precedent."Judge Neil Gorsuch said Tuesday the controversial Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion is “precedent” and acknowledged the ruling had been reaffirmed “many times.”
Gorsuch, President Trump’s nominee to fill the Supreme Court seat vacated when Justice Antonin Scalia died, does not have much of a history ruling on abortion issues, and the contentious subject was one of the first topics broached during the question-and-answer session of Gorsuch’s confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
“Roe v. Wade, decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court, it has been reaffirmed…and all of the other factors that go into analyzing precedent have to be considered,” Gorsuch told Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. “…A good judge will consider it as precedent of the United States Supreme Court, worthy as treatment of precedent like any other.”
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the first Democrat to question Gorsuch, immediately followed up, citing the importance of the issue since, she said, President Trump “said he would appoint someone who would overturn Roe.”
“Once a case is settled, that adds to the determinacy of the law,” Gorsuch told Feinstein, clarifying his position on precedent. “What was once a hotly-contested issue is no longer a hotly-contested issue. We move forward.”
Feinstein asked if Gorsuch considered Roe v. Wade “super precedent” – a decision that cannot be overturned.
“It has been reaffirmed many times, I can say that,” Gorsuch answered."
Gorsuch to Feinstein: Abortion ruling is 'precedent'
Sounds like another resounding defeat for the anti-abortion lobby.
Providing we can believe him...
See what I mean when I say liberalism almost always wins in the long run?
lol, so there's one vote for the idea that Gorsuch is simply being deceitful or dishonest in his characterization of Roe.
I don't think so. There are two ways to look at Roberts's Obamacare vote. 1. It's a tax. Congress has the power to levy any tax it wants with very little restriction beyond only Jews or something. But to rule Obamacare was legal was going to bring the wrath of the right. Roberts is the chief, so he got the short straw.
Except the entire argument by the Obama Administration defending the ACA was that it was NOT a tax.
OR 2. He was just not going to have the SC drawn into a partisan politcal fight.
Agreed. He took the coward's way out, plain and simple, and set a very dangerous precedent down the road. Once it's been decided that the federal government can force you to buy a product where does that authority end?
But it was declared a tax. No one was forced to buy the product. You were incentivized to buy the product by the offer of a tax break.
Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
Seig Heil! Adolph!
Hitler, like you, was a BIG fan of abortion. He wanted to slaughter ALL the inferiors.
Considering that was why planned parenthood was founded, where do you think he got the idea?
The nazis learned all their evil practices from American progressives.
How was he dishonest or deceitful?
And yet you don't give two shits about children born to poor parents.Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
And you know this how? Be specific as to how you know I don't give two shits.....but before you do? We have adopted children.
Now come at me, loon
Considering that was why planned parenthood was founded, where do you think he got the idea?
The nazis learned all their evil practices from American progressives.
Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
Seig Heil! Adolph!
Hitler, like you, was a BIG fan of abortion. He wanted to slaughter ALL the inferiors.
Abortion was against the law in Nazi Germany.
Oh no I will finish it. Food stamps fraud is statistically low. Duh.Your whining at food stamps recipients, who are primarily people with children.And yet you don't give two shits about children born to poor parents.Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
And you know this how? Be specific as to how you know I don't give two shits.....but before you do? We have adopted children.
Now come at me, loon
I whine about abuse of food stamps, stop making shit up ya daffy dumbass. Once again you've started something you can't finish because you assumed.
Considering that was why planned parenthood was founded, where do you think he got the idea?
The nazis learned all their evil practices from American progressives.
evil is demonizing women to the extent you'd seek oppressive government jurisdiction in their wombs.
i respect that religious people like you sincerely feeeeel like you're doing good, but you are sorely mistaken.
stop demonizing women by default, for once in your life.. and THINK.
The Supreme Court ruled and repeatedly reaffirmed that the Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's "zone of privacy" against state laws...
The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Roe v. Wade (1973) | PBS
It's very interesting to note that in Jewish law and tradition an unborn fetus is not considered a person (Heb. nefesh, lit. “soul”) until it has been born. The fetus is regarded as a part of the mother’s body and not a separate being until it begins to egress from the womb during parturition (childbirth).
Things haven't always been the way they are now with American Christianity.
Abortion
Oh no I will finish it. Food stamps fraud is statistically low. Duh.Your whining at food stamps recipients, who are primarily people with children.And yet you don't give two shits about children born to poor parents.Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
And you know this how? Be specific as to how you know I don't give two shits.....but before you do? We have adopted children.
Now come at me, loon
I whine about abuse of food stamps, stop making shit up ya daffy dumbass. Once again you've started something you can't finish because you assumed.
Oh no I will finish it. Food stamps fraud is statistically low. Duh.Your whining at food stamps recipients, who are primarily people with children.And yet you don't give two shits about children born to poor parents.Why do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
And you know this how? Be specific as to how you know I don't give two shits.....but before you do? We have adopted children.
Now come at me, loon
I whine about abuse of food stamps, stop making shit up ya daffy dumbass. Once again you've started something you can't finish because you assumed.
Considering that was why planned parenthood was founded, where do you think he got the idea?
The nazis learned all their evil practices from American progressives.
evil is demonizing women to the extent you'd seek oppressive government jurisdiction in their wombs.
i respect that religious people like you sincerely feeeeel like you're doing good, but you are sorely mistaken.
stop demonizing women by default, for once in your life.. and THINK.
The Supreme Court ruled and repeatedly reaffirmed that the Constitution's First, Fourth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments protect an individual's "zone of privacy" against state laws...
The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Roe v. Wade (1973) | PBS
It's very interesting to note that in Jewish law and tradition an unborn fetus is not considered a person (Heb. nefesh, lit. “soul”) until it has been born. The fetus is regarded as a part of the mother’s body and not a separate being until it begins to egress from the womb during parturition (childbirth).
Things haven't always been the way they are now with American Christianity.
Abortion
Interesting that you directly lie in the bolded part.
1. Abortion =/= murderWhy do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
Interesting that you directly lie in the bolded part.
the bolded part is a direct quote from the link provided at the Christian Left website, dimwit.
1. Abortion =/= murderWhy do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
2. Innocence is immaterial to the issue
3. There's billions more where they came from
4. Nobody is forcing you to have one
1. Abortion =/= murderWhy do you loons cheer legislation that allows murdering the most innocent of all? Freaking ghouls
2. Innocence is immaterial to the issue
3. There's billions more where they came from
4. Nobody is forcing you to have one