jknowgood
Diamond Member
the guy was talking at first if marriage is redefined a man could marry his son cause they couldn't traditionally have kids, but I'm sure it would change in time. All in fairness of course.A Pandora's box is fixing to be opened here. It was brought up that a widowed man could marry his son. So when he died the son wouldn't pay taxes on the estate. It could be done with a mother marrying her daughter. It couldn't fall under incest law, because they couldn't have a child, that's the primary reason incest isn't allowed. See what happens when you start changing the definition of things. It will be funny to see the outrage of the liberals when a billionaire passes billions in money and assests without a dime in taxes being collected, and just think you created the loop hole. Lol
Couldn't the same thing happen if a widowed man married his daughter?
I have known many people who married because of financial reasons. It doesn't mean that we should block those who marry for love