So yet another homosexual condones sex with under age boys. This time it's Milo

[Disir]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

What he encountered was molestation. What he is condoning is pedophilia

Pedophilia is prepubescent children. That isn't what he was dealing with.

 

[Lewdog]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

Did you watch the video with Joe Rogan? Milo literally thinks Rogan is odd for not wanting to fuck a young teenage girl when he is in his mid-twenties. That's advocating pedophilia... not a confusion about sexuality.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

What he encountered was molestation. What he is condoning is pedophilia

As I said before, "hebephilia" would be a more appropriate term - pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children, while hebephilia is attraction to pubescent children.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

What he encountered was molestation. What he is condoning is pedophilia

Pedophilia is prepubescent children. That isn't what he was dealing with.

Are you arguing that hebephilia is not as bad as pedophilia?

 

[Disir]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

Did you watch the video with Joe Rogan? Milo literally thinks Rogan is odd for not wanting to fuck a young teenage girl when he is in his mid-twenties. That's advocating pedophilia... not a confusion about sexuality.

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Teenagers are not even in there.

 

[Lewdog]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

Did you watch the video with Joe Rogan? Milo literally thinks Rogan is odd for not wanting to fuck a young teenage girl when he is in his mid-twenties. That's advocating pedophilia... not a confusion about sexuality.

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Teenagers are not even in there.

There is very little difference, they are both wrong. 14 year old children shouldn't be having sex with their teachers or any other adults for that matter. You understand right now you are arguing something that is irrelevant?

It's like arguing what color hood to have put over your head when walking to the gallows. It just doesn't matter and doesn't change the outcome.

 

[Disir]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

What he encountered was molestation. What he is condoning is pedophilia

Pedophilia is prepubescent children. That isn't what he was dealing with.

Are you arguing that hebephilia is not as bad as pedophilia?

And there is nothing in my post to suggest that.

Pedophilia is fucking horrendous. And hebephilia with young gay males is also horrendous but it is absolutely something that people that support LGBT need to deal with...........honestly. The reality is that many gay teens will seek those relationships out.

Now, how are you going to approach that?

 

[ptbw forever]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

There are plenty of 13 year olds who are mentally advanced enough to actually know what consent means and how to give it.

There are also plenty of 18 year olds who are too stupid to consent to ANYTHING, much less sex.

 

[Preacher]

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

Book canceled. Cpac appearance canceled.
Sounds as though the dirt bag belongs in prison.

And to think so many of you hoisted this freak to epic levels simply because he was gay & conservative.

Good riddance

He drove the leftards crazy for a while now he can fuck off

 

[Lewdog]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

There are plenty of 13 year olds who are mentally advanced enough to actually know what consent means and how to give it.

There are also plenty of 18 year olds who are too stupid to consent to ANYTHING, much less sex.

Another advocate for breaking the law... I understand that this forum is about free speech, but wasn't a thread shut down over this type of premise?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Breaking Update:

Breitbart employees threaten exit over Yiannopoulos

Milo should have been thrown overboard months ago, he was sent to infiltrate and subvert, some chose to refuse to pay attention about this.

Within the next hours Milo will be thrown overboard, of course the Milo situation would never have happened with Andrew, this is at the door of Solov.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

What he encountered was molestation. What he is condoning is pedophilia

Pedophilia is prepubescent children. That isn't what he was dealing with.

Are you arguing that hebephilia is not as bad as pedophilia?

And there is nothing in my post to suggest that.

Pedophilia is fucking horrendous. And hebephilia with young gay males is also horrendous but it is absolutely something that people that support LGBT need to deal with...........honestly. The reality is that many gay teens will seek those relationships out.

Now, how are you going to approach that?

Why are you trying to change the subject?

This isn't a thread about how to reach out and help gay teens, this is about Milo Yiannopoulos' comments.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

Book canceled. Cpac appearance canceled.
Sounds as though the dirt bag belongs in prison.

And to think so many of you hoisted this freak to epic levels simply because he was gay & conservative.

Good riddance

This guy is too risky to defend.

 

[ptbw forever]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

There are plenty of 13 year olds who are mentally advanced enough to actually know what consent means and how to give it.

There are also plenty of 18 year olds who are too stupid to consent to ANYTHING, much less sex.

Another advocate for breaking the law... I understand that this forum is about free speech, but wasn't a thread shut down over this type of premise?

I am not advocating breaking the law for MENSA teens, but you have to admit that the argument against teens having sex with adults is quite weak.

Once upon a time 13 year old girls were marrying 18 year old men on the regular, and that wasn't pedophilia at the time.

 

[BlueGin]

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

Book canceled. Cpac appearance canceled.
Sounds as though the dirt bag belongs in prison.

And to think so many of you hoisted this freak to epic levels simply because he was gay & conservative.

Good riddance

This is the guy that many on the RW wanted heard at Berkeley.

Bod if you are going to go after Milo god help you.

Milo in this interview was trying to explain how an elder gay world personna could help him and others thru the ropes of being a young gay.

NOW and if you really want to go for it Bod I will take you on and fuck you big time bitch.

I don't get you here but I will, I shall Bod do you in. Ready?

You are defending a guy that is advocating pedophilia and then threatening people that detest Milo for it. How classy.

Eh. Your side rewards Pedophiles with postage stamps in their honor. Pardon me if I don't fall for the fake concern over this.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This is what happens when you hitch your wagon to someone for purely political reasons without due diligence

 

[Lewdog]

Milo Yiannopoulos’s Pedophilia Comments Cost Him CPAC Role and Book Deal

Book canceled. Cpac appearance canceled.
Sounds as though the dirt bag belongs in prison.

And to think so many of you hoisted this freak to epic levels simply because he was gay & conservative.

Good riddance

This is the guy that many on the RW wanted heard at Berkeley.

Bod if you are going to go after Milo god help you.

Milo in this interview was trying to explain how an elder gay world personna could help him and others thru the ropes of being a young gay.

NOW and if you really want to go for it Bod I will take you on and fuck you big time bitch.

I don't get you here but I will, I shall Bod do you in. Ready?

You are defending a guy that is advocating pedophilia and then threatening people that detest Milo for it. How classy.

Eh. Your side rewards Pedophiles with postage stamps in their honor. Pardon me if I don't fall for the fake concern over this.

My side? Do we have to go through this shit again?

 

[Lewdog]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

There are plenty of 13 year olds who are mentally advanced enough to actually know what consent means and how to give it.

There are also plenty of 18 year olds who are too stupid to consent to ANYTHING, much less sex.

Another advocate for breaking the law... I understand that this forum is about free speech, but wasn't a thread shut down over this type of premise?

I am not advocating breaking the law for MENSA teens, but you have to admit that the argument against teens having sex with adults is quite weak.

Once upon a time 13 year old girls were marrying 18 year old men on the regular, and that wasn't pedophilia at the time.

Yeah and in certain parts of the world pre-teens can get married, sometimes to adult men, does that make it right? Good fucking grief... and intelligence has nothing to do with someone''s maturity level and ability to make correct decisions.

 

[Disir]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

Did you watch the video with Joe Rogan? Milo literally thinks Rogan is odd for not wanting to fuck a young teenage girl when he is in his mid-twenties. That's advocating pedophilia... not a confusion about sexuality.

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Teenagers are not even in there.

There is very little difference, they are both wrong. 14 year old children shouldn't be having sex with their teachers or any other adults for that matter. You understand right now you are arguing something that is irrelevant?

It's like arguing what color hood to have put over your head when walking to the gallows. It just doesn't matter and doesn't change the outcome.

Ok. Look, you're going to have to do something more than stand there and say, "It's wrong.".

What's wrong is that you and others like you tagged this guy as a pedophile and knew he wasn't. There are teens that are seeking those types of relationships........no matter how wrong or misguided we think they are.

It is relevant because, whether you choose to realize it or not, it is still ongoing and if you think that standing there and screaming, "It's wrong." is somehow going to impact that group of teens............you have another thing coming.

 

[Lewdog]

For those last, valiant defenders of Milo here:

Do you agree with him that "consent" is arbitrary?

Do you agree that "some" 13 year olds can "consent" to sex with adults?

Do you agree that this is a good thing for those kids?

No.

In fact, I dealt with a kid that was 14 years old going to a park to pick up men. He was flaming. There is not a doubt in my mind he was getting paid at least some of the time. In his mind, the world was against him because he was gay. In reality, nobody gave a damn that he was gay. Just go to school and go home because your 14.

Is it a good thing? No. But, don't think it's not happening. They aren't going to find the types of relationships in junior high and high school that all the other kids are going to find. So, they seek elsewhere. Still not ok..........but don't think it's not happening.

I don't even think 16 is a good age for "consent" especially considering the whole piece of the brain that deals with time and consequences doesn't finish growing in until age 26.

Milo sounds like a really confused guy that encountered sexual abuse in a church and accepts responsibility for it.

It's not pedophilia.

Did you watch the video with Joe Rogan? Milo literally thinks Rogan is odd for not wanting to fuck a young teenage girl when he is in his mid-twenties. That's advocating pedophilia... not a confusion about sexuality.

Pedophilia is the attraction to prepubescent children. Teenagers are not even in there.

There is very little difference, they are both wrong. 14 year old children shouldn't be having sex with their teachers or any other adults for that matter. You understand right now you are arguing something that is irrelevant?

It's like arguing what color hood to have put over your head when walking to the gallows. It just doesn't matter and doesn't change the outcome.

Ok. Look, you're going to have to do something more than stand there and say, "It's wrong.".

What's wrong is that you and others like you tagged this guy as a pedophile and knew he wasn't. There are teens that are seeking those types of relationships........no matter how wrong or misguided we think they are.

It is relevant because, whether you choose to realize it or not, it is still ongoing and if you think that standing there and screaming, "It's wrong." is somehow going to impact that group of teens............you have another thing coming.

It's NOT ABOUT THE TEENS! Do you not fucking understand that? Jesus fucking Christ... You are arguing for having sex with underage individuals because the teens want to. Do you seriously not see the flaw in your argument?