I'm not a neocon, but nice try. I know when the Cold War ended. Why should the super-rich pay a higher percentage than anyone else? Because they played the game better? and actually it WILL be my problem, but hey, nice try there, too.
Because they have alot more to give, without having any human suffering is why we have had a Progressive income tax in the first place.... to take from those who are working their fair share and are only getting by, should NOT be made to suffer for this country of ours.
Those that have benefited MOST by being in this country, through our stock markets, through our financial securities that are governed, through our physical safety provided to them and their employees, through our fire departments protecting their huge businesses, through our policemen protecting their businesses and employees, through our decent roads to transport their goods across country, through our postal service, through other businesses that could prosper such as UPS AND FEDEX, through our trucking companies and regs ruling them for safety that transport their goods, through our regulated banks that gave them financing, etc etc etc!!! I can go on and on how a version of what can called govt socialism or gvt intervention has helped the wealthiest a great deal more than is ever given credit imho!
Yes, it is fair to have a progressive tax system....those without money don't have huge businesses to protect, or even use our great roads and railways and airports, or invest in the stock market or even deal with banks for financing, or own an establishment that needs protecting from the loss due to fire....the poor live in neighborhoods where cops fear to enter and they certainly deal with higher crime rates, these innocent low income ones don't get the same security of protection as the wealthiest....even their kids go to crap schools....
Just because their income is low for a full weeks work, does not mean we should PUNISH them for not using all the resources in America, that the wealthiest learned to use and become accustomed to...again, in my opinion, this would be inhumane...and I hope this is not what you are saying?
Care
How much is a "fair share" Care?
Should some people get to live here and enjoy the services that this country provides and not pay anything into the system?
If some people get to not pay anything into the system, what incentive do they have to not ask for more and more? After all, it wouldn't be their money.
Is there some percentage of the population that you wouldn't want to push the "free ride?" I mean if 55% of the people didn't pay in, then they could always vote themselves more largess to be paid by the 45% that did pay in, right?
Just curious about your answers to those questions.
They pay taxes in most of their states through a sales tax, if they own homes like we did, they pay state/local taxes through their property taxes, if paying rent then through their higher rent fees to cover the owner's taxes, if they buy cigarettes they pay for other children's health care with the taxes on those and if they buy lottery tickets they pay for what the states collect on that, if they buy liquor they pay sin taxes on such, if they drive they pay gas taxes for the roads....NO ONE, and I mean no one, in this country is exempt from paying taxes to their government, and the State government these people live in ARE the ones providing MOST for these people of low income, NOT the federal government. In addition to this, the working low and middle income have paid 12% plus of their entire incomes with the match of the employer in to social security taxes, they have been over paying by DOUBLE...(the tax was 3% on individuals, 3% on businesses in your name until reagan in 1983 doubled it, so to pull in the surplusses) So these working class people NOT THE WEALTHIEST, have had their SS surplusses, to the tune of $300 BILLION A YEAR on some years, used to pay for what the wealthiest claim they are paying the most income tax for....which is just plain bullshit....and SS will probably never be paid back in the manner they should, which is from income tax funds...new laws will change to cut benefits instead....
NO, I do not think the 55% not paying income taxes will vote to tax the wealthiest even more, they have no money to donate to lobbyists representing them who then donate to the various congressmen and senatorial campaigns...follow the money.
care