Socialism threads bandwagon

[Harpy Eagle]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Are you kidding? Liberty is the only way a large, diverse population can stay united. When you have widely different, often conflicting, values in society - "live and let live" is the only sustainable approach. If you let one faction use government to force its will on the others, things disintegrate. That's what we're seeing now.

No, I am not kidding.

If everyone is living a "live and let live" lifestyle and nobody shares the same values anymore, are people really united?

Live and let live isn't a lifestyle. It's an attitude toward other people's lifestyles. It's respect (real respect, not the patronizing liberal horseshit) for diversity. Again, it's the only way a large, pluralistic society can last.

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

 

[BS Filter]

Are you kidding? Liberty is the only way a large, diverse population can stay united. When you have widely different, often conflicting, values in society - "live and let live" is the only sustainable approach. If you let one faction use government to force its will on the others, things disintegrate. That's what we're seeing now.

No, I am not kidding.

If everyone is living a "live and let live" lifestyle and nobody shares the same values anymore, are people really united?

Live and let live isn't a lifestyle. It's an attitude toward other people's lifestyles. It's respect (real respect, not the patronizing liberal horseshit) for diversity. Again, it's the only way a large, pluralistic society can last.

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

 

[danielpalos]

Government is social-ism.

 

[dblack]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Are you kidding? Liberty is the only way a large, diverse population can stay united. When you have widely different, often conflicting, values in society - "live and let live" is the only sustainable approach. If you let one faction use government to force its will on the others, things disintegrate. That's what we're seeing now.

No, I am not kidding.

If everyone is living a "live and let live" lifestyle and nobody shares the same values anymore, are people really united?

Live and let live isn't a lifestyle. It's an attitude toward other people's lifestyles. It's respect (real respect, not the patronizing liberal horseshit) for diversity. Again, it's the only way a large, pluralistic society can last.

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

 

[Blues Man]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

 

[BS Filter]

No, I am not kidding.

If everyone is living a "live and let live" lifestyle and nobody shares the same values anymore, are people really united?

Live and let live isn't a lifestyle. It's an attitude toward other people's lifestyles. It's respect (real respect, not the patronizing liberal horseshit) for diversity. Again, it's the only way a large, pluralistic society can last.

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

 

[Tehon]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I defined it and did so in such a way that left no question what it is.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Live and let live isn't a lifestyle. It's an attitude toward other people's lifestyles. It's respect (real respect, not the patronizing liberal horseshit) for diversity. Again, it's the only way a large, pluralistic society can last.

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I defined it and did so in such a way that left no question what it is.

True, you were one of the couple that did so.

 

[BS Filter]

Yes, mutual respect is the goal. Sad to say it's the left that can't live and let live. If you don't go along with their agenda, you're a racist, bigoted, hateful, fat poopy pants.

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping. If you read your bible you'd know that Jesus said marriage is a Male and female. Paul said homosexuality is sin and he got that straight from the Holy Spirit. The bible says ALL Scripture is God breathed. Yeah, we're all bigots, even you.

 

[dblack]

Socialism is guaranteed income by the government. Socialism is healthcare for everyone that should work but don't. Socialism is free food for people that won't work but are able.

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

this from the homophobic bigot! too damn funny

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

 

[night_son]

This thread drips stupidity. The commonest and most boring method of defending an indefensible position is to stall and state obvious anti-facts. The commonest method of stalling is to intentionally complexify an issue. The commonest method of radical American Leftist "debate" is to claim no easy, accurate or definitive definition exists, thus all sides of given debate must circle jerk whilst scratching their heads and dusting off ancient tomes written in languages they cannot comprehend in hopes of shedding light on the issue for debate. Google has already explained at length to most of you fools exactly and historically what socialism is and is not. However, the likes of those of you who are champions of socialism will continue to procrastinate, stall and complexify as if you still have no clue when in fact you already know too well what it is. Conclusion: you drip stupidity of a very transparent kind; so transparent in fact that any child could see through your intentional attempts at obfuscation of socialism's definition. Perhaps one day you fools who masturbate dreaming of a socialist America will get your wish and socialism's definition will find you boiling your shoes for soup to feed your families. Get a life, get a clue, leave the cult of the radical American Left. When SHTF trust me: you don't want to be one of those guys. Mercy will not find you.

Socialism is a temporary transitional step to communism. There you go. Now stop bleeding stupidity all over the internet.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That is about as close as anyone has come to giving a definition, thanks for doing that.

Is it socialism to give farmers money not to plant crops?

That is about as close as anyone has come to defining socialism that agrees with the way you define it.

I am a socialist and that definition is miles from what I believe.

It is not even close to how I would define it, but at least he had the balls to actually offer his definition. more than anyone else on here would do.

I'm content to let socialists define it themselves. Here's what the Democratic Socialists of America have to say:

What is Democratic Socialism?
Democratic socialists believe that both the economy and society should be run democratically—to meet public needs, not to make profits for a few. To achieve a more just society, many structures of our government and economy must be radically transformed through greater economic and social democracy so that ordinary Americans can participate in the many decisions that affect our lives.

That sounds just like government ownership of all means of production and distribution to me

Yep. But it seems that liberals are on a campaign to muddle the definition. I wonder why.

It is not just liberals, those on the right use the word to describe anything and everything they do not like that the government is doing.

The 10 to 20 threads a week on this board talking about socialism are not started by the liberals on the board.

Did you even read this thread and all the different definitions given by those on the right?

 

[BS Filter]

Yep, I'm a bigot, just like you. Christophobic bigot.

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I have no problem with Christians, I spent 3/4 of my life involved in the christian church. Grew up in one, was baptized in the 5th grade. Was the Christian Lay Leader for my boot camp platoon, have the Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal awarded for my work with the chapels on Kadena AFB on Okinawa.

You have no clue what you are talking about.

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

 

[BS Filter]

You're a phony that calls himself a Christian, there are many like you. The Bible and Jesus tell us about wolves in sheep's clothing. Your words here betray you. Your approval of the homosexual agenda in our public schools give you away. Phony.

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I do not call myself a Christian, do not put words in my mouth.

It is people like you that I do not any longer use that label, I do not want to be associated with bigotry and hatred. If you had ever bothered to read your bible you would know that Jesus was very much not about forcing his views on others, he allowed them their freewill to choose for themselves which road they would take.

People like you think you know better than Jesus and that it is your job to force people to be moral. Well, it does not work. Worry about yourself and your soul and let others make that choice for themselves.

Yeah, Jesus, Paul, Peter, John, etc, were all hateful bigots, huh. Your mask is slipping.

No, they were not. But yet you read about them and think that you are supposed to be one...how does that work?

Where did Jesus tell you to hate anyone?

Disagreement with someone is not hating. Idiot.

You're exposing yourself for the immature punk you really are. Keep going.