Something Weird Is Going on in Fulton County, Where Trump Is Expected to Be Indicted

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I respectfully demur.
Two times.
To Foxfyre's and to ozro's.

Look, I have no special insight....I ain't a prosecutor, local or federal, nor am I even a lawyer, but........but from reading various responsible 'legacy' sources it seems our law enforcement personnel have a case to make against Don Trump, the man.

To wit:

  • The pay-off to the Porn Queen.....more germane, the lying and cover up of the pay-off. A New York state case.
  • The Mar-A-Lago docs case. He defied a subpoena. A federal subpoena. A federal case.
  • The J6 case --- the appearance seems to indicate to a layman that Don Trump sought to employ a variety of strategies by which he and his allies thought he could reverse or override the will of voters, including pressuring state legislatures to use their own authority to replace swing state electors for Mr Biden with electors for Mr Trump.
  • And now the Georgia 'state' case involving.....audio recordings with Raffensberger, and Watson, and Ralston. All Georgia officials overseeing the election or the legislature. Where again, Don Trump and allies sought to overturn the election results in Georgia.
In short, there is meat on the bone. There's a there there.
It would be dereliction of duty if our law enforcement agencies did not look into each of those developments to determine if a crime was committed. Three grand juries (at least three) have informed the prosecution teams that they think there is a there there involving criminality.

So the investigations and the indictments are par for the course. Standard operating procedure.

Now, as far as Democrats, or the DNC, or any individual or identifiable group who may cheer such prosecutions .....well, .....well, .....duh!!
No one who can fog a mirror can expect an opposing political party to sit on their hands when they see an opponent run afoul of our law enforcement protocols. In short, of course they will applaud and encourage. And help if they can and if appropriate. Duh!!

But that doesn't mean the law enforcement actions are partisan. Law enforcement is umpiring. They likely don't give a rip who the cheerleaders are for either side. They have a job to do --- look into behaviors that appear illegal, determine if they, in their judgement, are illegal; take their conclusions to a grand jury; and then follow that juries conclusion accordingly.

Seems like the way things should be in a land where the rule of law rules.

The Dems, the DNC, or those who are critical of Don Trump are merely along for the ride. And likely.....enjoying it.

IMHO
Again and again it has been shown that the 'indictments' immediately followed some bad news re Hunter or Uncle Joe. That has happened so predictably now it cannot be pure coincidence but is calculated and intentional. That makes the indictments strongly politically motivated and unrelated to any 'crime' DJT has actually committed. This time they didn't have the indictment ready yet so a list of Trump's 'crimes' that the grand jury is considering was 'accidentally' posted. (Again I will send my brochure of pretty bridges for sale to anybody who believes that was an accident.)

Even key Democrats have admitted they did not use due process as required in the Constitution on either impeachment or the J6 committee that was 100% weighted to damage DJT and made no effort whatsoever to find out what actually happened that day. The same will no doubt be revealed in the politically motivated investigations and indictments.

Those capable of intellectual honesty and critical thinking can't miss these truths. Mental midgets will continue to believe what the Democrats/surrogate MSM tell them they are supposed to believe. Those somewhat smarter will pretend the political and unethical persecution of DJT is totally justified.
 
Last edited:
So you'll accept the juries decisions? Or will you only accept the outcomes if they go your way?
All trump had to do was keep his mouth shut and let the process take its course and then accept the results. Instead he and other republicans put themselves in jeopardy of breaking the law. Keep in mind these indictments arent based off of dem testimony. The testimony is trumps own words and actions as well as those of his fellow republicans.
Trump keep his mouth shut. LMAO, a snowball in hell has a better chance.
 
Damn, but your rebuttal skills are off the chain.
Thank you. I do try to make an argument that can be supported via logic, reason, and/or verifiable facts. It's nice to be appreciated for that.

You should know that I have limited time for and even less patience with mental midgets who can offer nothing but assigned slogans, talking points, insults, etc. So if I choose not to respond to all of them well, sue me.
 
Again and again it has been shown that the 'indictments' immediately followed some bad news re Hunter or Uncle Joe. That has happened so predictably now it cannot be pure coincidence but is calculated and intentional. That makes the indictments strongly politically motivated and unrelated to any 'crime' DJT has actually committed.

Even key Democrats have admitted they did not use due process as required in the Constitution on either impeachment or the J6 committee that was 100% weighted to damage DJT and made no effort whatsoever to find out what actually happened that day. The same will no doubt be revealed in the politically motivated investigations and indictments.

Those capable of intellectual honesty and critical thinking can't miss these truths. Mental midgets will continue to believe what the Democrats/surrogate MSM tell them they are supposed to believe. Those somewhat smarter will pretend the political and unethical persecution of DJT is totally justified.
The actual idea that you have some concept of critical thinking is the funniest thing I have heard in a long time.
 
So you'll accept the juries decisions? Or will you only accept the outcomes if they go your way?
All trump had to do was keep his mouth shut and let the process take its course and then accept the results. Instead he and other republicans put themselves in jeopardy of breaking the law. Keep in mind these indictments arent based off of dem testimony. The testimony is trumps own words and actions as well as those of his fellow republicans.

Jack Smith has 86 witnesses and none of them are Democrats.
 
Thank you. I do try to make an argument that can be supported via logic, reason, verifiable facts. It's nice to be appreciated for that.

You should know that I have limited time for and even less patience with mental midgets who can offer nothing but assigned slogans, talking points, insults, etc. So if I choose not to respond to all of them well, sue me.
The timing of these indictments are meaningless.
The Georgia case has nothing to do with 1/6.
 
So you'll accept the juries decisions? Or will you only accept the outcomes if they go your way?

It's hilarious how you seem to think this is some sort of interrogation.

You ignore every fact I throw your way, and just manifest new questions to conjure the illusion that you're some sort of dogged pursuer of truth - and I'm the wayward soul whose been brainwashed.

As I already demonstrated by providing you my "political arc", the truth is quite the opposite.
 
It's hilarious how you seem to think this is some sort of interrogation.

You ignore every fact I throw your way, and just manifest new questions to conjure the illusion that you're some sort of dogged pursuer of truth - and I'm the wayward soul whose been brainwashed.

As I already demonstrated by providing you my "political arc", the truth is quite the opposite.
What facts have you given in this thread? It's all conspiracy theories.
 
Thank you. I do try to make an argument that can be supported via logic, reason, and/or verifiable facts. It's nice to be appreciated for that.

You should know that I have limited time for and even less patience with mental midgets who can offer nothing but assigned slogans, talking points, insults, etc. So if I choose not to respond to all of them well, sue me.
It is just that sarcasm somehow escapes you.
 
Again and again it has been shown that the 'indictments' immediately followed some bad news re Hunter or Uncle Joe. That has happened so predictably now it cannot be pure coincidence but is calculated and intentional. That makes the indictments strongly politically motivated and unrelated to any 'crime' DJT has actually committed. This time they didn't have the indictment ready yet so a list of Trump's 'crimes' that the grand jury is considering was 'accidentally' posted. (Again I will send my brochure of pretty bridges for sale to anybody who believes that was an accident.)

Even key Democrats have admitted they did not use due process as required in the Constitution on either impeachment or the J6 committee that was 100% weighted to damage DJT and made no effort whatsoever to find out what actually happened that day. The same will no doubt be revealed in the politically motivated investigations and indictments.

Those capable of intellectual honesty and critical thinking can't miss these truths. Mental midgets will continue to believe what the Democrats/surrogate MSM tell them they are supposed to believe. Those somewhat smarter will pretend the political and unethical persecution of DJT is totally justified.

Now up next:

Watch Detective John Doe completely ignore everything you just said, or "debunk" it with a simple negation and no evidence; then proceed to interrogate you.

You have to admire his sober and prudent judgment as a completely non-partisan arbiter of the facts.
 
I'm going out on a limb and predict that Grifty Trump** gets no bail and has to sit in a county jail until his case is ready for trial.

**impeached
 
Now up next:

Watch Detective John Doe completely ignore everything you just said, or "debunk" it with a simple negation and no evidence; then proceed to interrogate you.

You have to admire his sober and prudent judgment as a completely non-partisan arbiter of the facts.
That's what you dont get, clown. This is going to be decided in a court of law, not on a message board. You'll accept the outcome like you've accepted Biden as your President.
 

Forum List

Back
Top