Sorry democrats,primary results prove that Trump's agenda is a smash hit


Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.
 

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The economy is growing less now. But that is to be expected. The economy would be growing as it is, more or less the same, no matter who was president, unless they messed it all up.

Trump is taking the plaudits and people are giving it to him. Those who give it don't seem to understand that it's not him.
 
The great majority who give Trump plaudits know he does not deserve it; they just don't care.
 

Bossie is a partisan hack. The fact is that it was not good news for Republicans. New Jersey was not good news for Republicans. 3 Republican seats are definitely in danger with 1 being likely gone. In Iowa, the Democrats got who they wanted again and the number of voters who participated in the primary was up. New Mexico shows the potential for a Democrat sweep. In California, Democrats were not shut out of any districts. Be interesting to see if they revisit the jungle primary. Also they got pretty much who they wanted. In several districts, the question for both Democrats and Republicans is whether moderates who saw their candidate shut out will vote for a more extreme candidate or vice versa. In Montana, the Republican won with only a little over a third of the vote despite the fact he has run statewide. Montana is a more conservative state but it is a practical state. Moderates tend to do better. That is why Montana elected a moderate Democrat Governor even as Trump was easily defeating Clinton.
 

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.
 

Bossie is a partisan hack. The fact is that it was not good news for Republicans. New Jersey was not good news for Republicans. 3 Republican seats are definitely in danger with 1 being likely gone. In Iowa, the Democrats got who they wanted again and the number of voters who participated in the primary was up. New Mexico shows the potential for a Democrat sweep. In California, Democrats were not shut out of any districts. Be interesting to see if they revisit the jungle primary. Also they got pretty much who they wanted. In several districts, the question for both Democrats and Republicans is whether moderates who saw their candidate shut out will vote for a more extreme candidate or vice versa. In Montana, the Republican won with only a little over a third of the vote despite the fact he has run statewide. Montana is a more conservative state but it is a practical state. Moderates tend to do better. That is why Montana elected a moderate Democrat Governor even as Trump was easily defeating Clinton.
Sucks for democraps in California is republicans actually have a reason to get out and vote in November since there is a republican running for a spot in the state government in almost every post!
 
Trump's policy outside of the dumbass tariffs and outrageous government spending is about as good as you could hope for from the modern day bloated overbearing government. If he would cut his hyperbolic and crazy talk down by just half, he'd see a pretty sizable bump in his approval numbers. People like a booming economy and job availability. People want something done on immigration, they like tax cuts, they like the "America first" sentiment and they like that we're seeing major wins against Islamic terrorism. He gets all that pretty well. Then he goes and undermines himself daily with stupid and/or false statements.
 
It's great fo' Dems in da bluayh state of Cali.

Republicans shot their shorts. Too bad, Odium.
 

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.
 

Bossie is a partisan hack. The fact is that it was not good news for Republicans. New Jersey was not good news for Republicans. 3 Republican seats are definitely in danger with 1 being likely gone. In Iowa, the Democrats got who they wanted again and the number of voters who participated in the primary was up. New Mexico shows the potential for a Democrat sweep. In California, Democrats were not shut out of any districts. Be interesting to see if they revisit the jungle primary. Also they got pretty much who they wanted. In several districts, the question for both Democrats and Republicans is whether moderates who saw their candidate shut out will vote for a more extreme candidate or vice versa. In Montana, the Republican won with only a little over a third of the vote despite the fact he has run statewide. Montana is a more conservative state but it is a practical state. Moderates tend to do better. That is why Montana elected a moderate Democrat Governor even as Trump was easily defeating Clinton.
Sucks for democraps in California is republicans actually have a reason to get out and vote in November since there is a republican running for a spot in the state government in almost every post!

The Republicans could not get 12% in the Senate race. It also could be good for Democrats as it gives Democrats a reason to vote and there are far more Democrats than Republicans.
 
The blue wave propaganda fake news WILL continue, that's the only hope Dem's have lying and spinning.
 

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.
It's common knowledge, (don't ya know) that GW's successes were due to Clinton. Obama's failures were due to GW. Trump's successes are absolutely due to Obama. The next President in 2024... their failures will of course be due to Trump... I mean really, get with the program here... lol

The issue is that presidents often have more impact after their time.

The best way of saying it would be that a competent president will keep the boat steady, and a bad president will make things worse. A president can't really make things better.

George W. Bush had his wars. Clinton helped make the recession, but then again Bush had 8 years, and CONGRESS had 8 years to sort it out.

Congress is an important part of US politics, which is why a president often can't be that important for success, success often has to come from Congress too.
O... I see, So why is it that the majority of things I'm really pleased about over the last year and a half are direct, overt reversals of Obama doctrine / policies...?

There's a big difference between what makes you happy now, in the short term, and what actually has a lasting impact on your life.
:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 

Bossie is a partisan hack. The fact is that it was not good news for Republicans. New Jersey was not good news for Republicans. 3 Republican seats are definitely in danger with 1 being likely gone. In Iowa, the Democrats got who they wanted again and the number of voters who participated in the primary was up. New Mexico shows the potential for a Democrat sweep. In California, Democrats were not shut out of any districts. Be interesting to see if they revisit the jungle primary. Also they got pretty much who they wanted. In several districts, the question for both Democrats and Republicans is whether moderates who saw their candidate shut out will vote for a more extreme candidate or vice versa. In Montana, the Republican won with only a little over a third of the vote despite the fact he has run statewide. Montana is a more conservative state but it is a practical state. Moderates tend to do better. That is why Montana elected a moderate Democrat Governor even as Trump was easily defeating Clinton.
Sucks for democraps in California is republicans actually have a reason to get out and vote in November since there is a republican running for a spot in the state government in almost every post!

The Republicans could not get 12% in the Senate race. It also could be good for Democrats as it gives Democrats a reason to vote and there are far more Democrats than Republicans.
huh?
 
Democrats are almost a lead pipe cinch to win at least one congressional house back. If they don’t....well...there are numerous Libs on this board who will be inconsolable. That would be funny.

Actually I don't give a damn,filthy rich corporatist, sucking off the America first uneducated
Still don't know the def of liberal?
No Latin in college?
No college?
Typical zero Ed trumpette
 
Let's be real, Democrats see more folks being poor, angry, and fully dependent on Government, as a huge benefit to their Party. The Party thrives on misery. The last thing they want is a happy, prosperous, independent populace. They want this for the entire country...

 

Forum List

Back
Top