Sorry democrats,primary results prove that Trump's agenda is a smash hit

[JakeStarkey]

It's Trump, people.

By a whopping 25-point margin, voters say they’re more likely to back a congressional candidate who promises to serve as a check on President Donald Trump, according to a new national poll from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.

And by a similar margin, they say they’re less likely to vote for someone who has supported the president on most issues.


Here is the actual poll: http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_creative/18416NBCWSJJunePoll6718Release.pdf


The negatives of Trump's approval rating are quite high.

 

[imawhosure]

It's Trump, people.

By a whopping 25-point margin, voters say they’re more likely to back a congressional candidate who promises to serve as a check on President Donald Trump, according to a new national poll from NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.

And by a similar margin, they say they’re less likely to vote for someone who has supported the president on most issues.


Here is the actual poll: http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_creative/18416NBCWSJJunePoll6718Release.pdf


The negatives of Trump's approval rating are quite high.

Now Jake the snake wants to cite polls, lol. Grasping at straws are you?!?!?!-)

What Jake NEGLECTS to tell you is------------>that polls are a snapshot in time. What time is it today? Oh, about a week before the IG report, the Kim Jung Un summit, and 4 weeks before Mcabe is given immunity and sings like a bird on national TV, lololol!

Let me tell all of ya--------->get decent odds, bet the farm on the Republicans holding everything; which will mean the long term bet is Trump wins again in 2020, because if the far left can't gain the House this time, they have no brake to stop what will be coming out on these ongoing investigations.

And that is what the far left fears the most! Trump and friends were on the defensive 360 days into his administration. Now they are now on the offensive, and have the goods on the left. The left is scared to death! If they do not get the House, they may be out of power for 12 years minimum.

If YOU like that idea, VOTE, and bury their asses-)

 

[otto105]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Democrats Strengthen House Takeover Prospects in Primary Voting

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Alt Right are so afraid of the Polls

The Trumper have been on defensive ever since Mueller was appointed and our just crying every day.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Democrats Strengthen House Takeover Prospects in Primary Voting

Did you read the article.

He says very little to support the title.

What is quite clear is that the "blue wave" some have been crowing about...ain't gonna happen.

Looks like the GOP will strengthen themselves in the senate.

It's going to be so much fun whatching the next two years.

 

[JakeStarkey]

All of the articles support the concept that the Dems made the right strides in the right direction.

Anyone telling you otherwise is lying to you.

 

[Siete]

Trumps agenda;

Repeal/replace healthcare - NO
build a 2000 mile border wall - NO
lower the debt - NO
ban muslims - NO


BIG FUKN SMASH HIT -

NO
NO
AND
HELL NO

 

[frigidweirdo]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

It's common knowledge, (don't ya know) that GW's successes were due to Clinton. Obama's failures were due to GW. Trump's successes are absolutely due to Obama. The next President in 2024... their failures will of course be due to Trump... I mean really, get with the program here... lol

The issue is that presidents often have more impact after their time.

The best way of saying it would be that a competent president will keep the boat steady, and a bad president will make things worse. A president can't really make things better.

George W. Bush had his wars. Clinton helped make the recession, but then again Bush had 8 years, and CONGRESS had 8 years to sort it out.

Congress is an important part of US politics, which is why a president often can't be that important for success, success often has to come from Congress too.

O... I see, So why is it that the majority of things I'm really pleased about over the last year and a half are direct, overt reversals of Obama doctrine / policies...?

There's a big difference between what makes you happy now, in the short term, and what actually has a lasting impact on your life.

Fucking hell...... It's like high school here.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The OP is childish as well.

Reading thoroughly the commentaries, etc., the dems made a big stride to the fall elections with success.

Such undocumented alt facts may not permitted on Google Amazon etc.

 

[Preacher]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Oh did you all nominate a bunch of nutjobs? Fantastic. No Hillary or Russian sabotage to depress Dem turnout this time around. No broken electoral college for you to manipulate either.

Dem turnout sucked because 1. You nominated the WRONG candidate. A woman who defended a child rapist in court,laughed about it etc AND who attacked her husbands victims and stood by his rapist ass,2. She called HALF THE COUNTRY deplorables! 3. She was just unliked! People hated her! Even Joe Manchin said he should not have backed her in the election! Whine all you want you did it to yourselves no one else. Between a shit candidate and a pissed off American electorate we got President Trump THANK GOD!

 

[otto105]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Democrats Strengthen House Takeover Prospects in Primary Voting

Did you read the article.

He says very little to support the title.

What is quite clear is that the "blue wave" some have been crowing about...ain't gonna happen.

Looks like the GOP will strengthen themselves in the senate.

It's going to be so much fun whatching the next two years.

Not so much for you... Poll: Economic satisfaction under Trump isn’t helping his party’s 2018 chances

 

[busybee01]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Bossie is a partisan hack. The fact is that it was not good news for Republicans. New Jersey was not good news for Republicans. 3 Republican seats are definitely in danger with 1 being likely gone. In Iowa, the Democrats got who they wanted again and the number of voters who participated in the primary was up. New Mexico shows the potential for a Democrat sweep. In California, Democrats were not shut out of any districts. Be interesting to see if they revisit the jungle primary. Also they got pretty much who they wanted. In several districts, the question for both Democrats and Republicans is whether moderates who saw their candidate shut out will vote for a more extreme candidate or vice versa. In Montana, the Republican won with only a little over a third of the vote despite the fact he has run statewide. Montana is a more conservative state but it is a practical state. Moderates tend to do better. That is why Montana elected a moderate Democrat Governor even as Trump was easily defeating Clinton.

Sucks for democraps in California is republicans actually have a reason to get out and vote in November since there is a republican running for a spot in the state government in almost every post!

The Republicans could not get 12% in the Senate race. It also could be good for Democrats as it gives Democrats a reason to vote and there are far more Democrats than Republicans.

huh?

State races between 2 Democrats might have made Democrats complacent. This ensures that will not happen. Also something from Chris Stirwalt fron Fox NEWS.

Tuesday was Democrats’ biggest test so far with 14 competitive House races, two competitive Senate races and two competitive gubernatorial races all on the ballot. The imperative this week, as it is every week for Democrats, is to pick the right candidates to keep Republicans on defense.

Tuesday was further complicated for the Blue Team because of California’s cockamamie election laws, under which the party could have found itself “locked out” in three of the state’s seven districts where Republican-held seats are at risk. That didn’t happen.

There was also the danger for Democrats that former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa would make it into the November runoff with first-place finisher Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom, which would doubtless turn ugly. That didn’t happen either.

Dems doing what it takes to win

 

[LeftofLeft]

David Bossie: Sorry, Democrats, primary results prove that Trump’s agenda is a smash hit

Some truth and sanity prevails.

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Potentially.

The biggest problem here is that Trump will only get judged for a few years.

When his policies hit the fan it'll be too late for people to vote against him.

He's lucky. He's inherited a great economy.

Democracy is the preserve of shortsighted people.

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

 

[otto105]

Trump inherited an improving economy yet one of sluggish growth. Trump’s policies jolted the economy. Much cash stayed on the sidelines during the Obama years for fear of his policies.

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

Yeah, our nation could never function with healthier people and our economy would surely fail to expand.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The trend towards insourcing started under Obama. Many of the announcements Trump made in his first year were likely made during the Obama years. The fact is that growth has been slow under Trump as well. What it shows is the economy is much more dynamic than a President. Neither Trump or Obama has had anything to do with the economy.

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

Yeah, our nation could never function with healthier people and our economy would surely fail to expand.

What's your point?

The US healthcare system could be run without all the leeches which cost the US about 6% of GDP.

The US Federal Govt spends MORE on healthcare than the UK govt does. How? The UK govt has the NHS, a single payer system. Everyone gets treated.

 

[LeftofLeft]

I believe that policies pursued by Presidents can indirectly influence the direction of an economy. While not a dominating impact or influence, it is an impact.

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

Yeah, our nation could never function with healthier people and our economy would surely fail to expand.

What's your point?

The US healthcare system could be run without all the leeches which cost the US about 6% of GDP.

The US Federal Govt spends MORE on healthcare than the UK govt does. How? The UK govt has the NHS, a single payer system. Everyone gets treated.

Do more people from the UK come to US for healthcare or do more people leave the US to the UK for healthcare?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sure they can. They're more likely to have a negative impact though. Bush's wars had a big impact because they cost a lot of money.

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

Yeah, our nation could never function with healthier people and our economy would surely fail to expand.

What's your point?

The US healthcare system could be run without all the leeches which cost the US about 6% of GDP.

The US Federal Govt spends MORE on healthcare than the UK govt does. How? The UK govt has the NHS, a single payer system. Everyone gets treated.

Do more people from the UK come to US for healthcare or do more people leave the US to the UK for healthcare?

That's a complete bad example.

The US has some great healthcare, for those who can afford it.

The UK has good healthcare for everyone.

The US spends twice as much. Imagine what the NHS would be like with double the spending.

You know the Conservatives in the UK say the UK is spending too much on healthcare, and yet want a US style system, to enrich their friend.

 

[LeftofLeft]

As did Obama’s commitment to redistribution of wealth via healthcare.

Well, the US healthcare system is a massive drain on US resources whether it's Obamacare, what was before it or what exists now.

Yeah, our nation could never function with healthier people and our economy would surely fail to expand.

What's your point?

The US healthcare system could be run without all the leeches which cost the US about 6% of GDP.

The US Federal Govt spends MORE on healthcare than the UK govt does. How? The UK govt has the NHS, a single payer system. Everyone gets treated.

Do more people from the UK come to US for healthcare or do more people leave the US to the UK for healthcare?

That's a complete bad example.

The US has some great healthcare, for those who can afford it.

The UK has good healthcare for everyone.

The US spends twice as much. Imagine what the NHS would be like with double the spending.

You know the Conservatives in the UK say the UK is spending too much on healthcare, and yet want a US style system, to enrich their friend.

Quality over quantity.