Spoiler Alert: Prosecutors' Tortuous Trump Case Is 'Confusing' to Nearly Everyone

I guess the prosecution is going to have to produce a check made out to Daniel’s and signed by Trump.
Good luck with that.

The prosecution doesn't need that. Sadly, it appears you don't even know what this trial is about.
 
Here is a neutral party legal thought -

a crucial flaw in the case - highlighting how the attempt to revive a misdemeanor charge from 2016 through allegations of a federal campaign finance violation lacks substantial legal basis and credibility.
 
That doesn't make it "illegal"

Any other guess?

Of course it does. Again... Cohen was charged with that crime. A crime you idiotically deny is a crime.

Cohen, a lawyer himself, pleaded guilty to committing that crime. A crime you moronically deny is a crime.

Cohen went to jail for committing that crime, among other crimes. A crime you stupidly deny is a crime.
 
The prosecution expected Pecker to confirm their allegation that President Trump asked him to “catch and kill” stories he believed would harm him during his 2016 campaign for presidency.

However, Pecker did no such thing.

Instead, he totally unraveled the narrative by revealing that it was actually Trump’s disgraced former lawyer Michael Cohen — not Trump himself — who was concerned about the potential impact of negative stories on Trump’s campaign.

Oh no.
 


Not only was it taken to court. Cohen plead guilty AND went to jail for it. This under the TRUMP administration.

So this idea that nothing criminal happened and they just are doing this to hurt Trump seems to be... well incorrect.
since when is someone elses tax evasion on some other person?

Hunter Xiden evaded 2 million in taxes!!!! where's his guilty verdict?
 
it is not surprising that the geniuses at pjmedia so not understand the case.

only 12 people, need to understand the case.
Actually, only one. That's all it would take for a hung jury, and if they couldn't get a conviction in the bluest of blue New York, there would be little reason to try again.
 
Of course it does. Again... Cohen was charged with that crime. A crime you idiotically deny is a crime.

Cohen, a lawyer himself, pleaded guilty to committing that crime. A crime you moronically deny is a crime.

Cohen went to jail for committing that crime, among other crimes. A crime you stupidly deny is a crime.

Strike 2.
 
Of course it was illegal. That's why Cohen went to jail for it, among other crimes; and why Pecker took an immunity deal to avoid prosecution. The limit is far less than those amounts.
What Cohen did was illegal, what other people did wasn’t
 
But for the Rabid Right not linking to a freely available story on several platforms about Hunter Biden was a gross violation of free speech by Twitter.
Yeah, and Hillary's dossier of outrageous LIES were broadcast as TRUTH for YEARS, boo boo.
But wait, that's Different.
:rolleyes:
 
He threatened to sue Touch magazine after they contacted him in regards to Daniel's story and someone threatened her life if she went public with it.

And? If they want to pursue him for that go right ahead, but that would meant the current felony charge of campaign tampering would need to be thrown out. The bottom line is that they have no real felony case here. They just want to keep Trump busy during the campaign while Joe is out spewing garbage to any useful idiot that will listen.
 
It wasn't used in the 2016 campaign. SeaMonkey.
So? Doesn’t change the fact she funded it, frankly it’s much worse, the Obama, xiden admin used it to undermine the new admin

And they knew it was illegally obtained by Clinton and full of russian lies she paid for

That’s how deplorable the demafacist are
 
No real crime, no victims. Campaign violations mentioned above are always settled with only a fine.

Didn't Hillary use legal funds to get the fake Russian dossier nonsense going? How on earth would that NOT be considered campaign interference if Trump's case is? From what I understand, she was just fined.

This whole thing is just a big sham. I don't think most liberals are so dim that they don't recognize this. They know it, but they don't care. It is worrisome that they are willing to essentially undermine the rule of law just to satisfy their political agendas.
 
So? Doesn’t change the fact she funded it, frankly it’s much worse, the Obama, xiden admin used it to undermine the new admin

And they knew it was illegally obtained by Clinton and full of russian lies she paid for

That’s how deplorable the demafacist are
She didn't even know of it's existence during most of the campaign. You got a check or receipt that she personally funded it?

Also what did Durham find in his investigation into Obamagate?
 

Forum List

Back
Top