bendog
Diamond Member
Imo "money laundering" is thrown about a bit loosely. Obviously, Mueller is looking into where Trump Inc money came from, and properly so because if the money came from Russia, he has a motive to shut down Comey. So, expertise like Weissmann is said to have would be useful.Bannon's statements point to laundering.At the core, its probably money laundering.
Perhaps Trump has a history of loans from Russia, with Felix Sater involvement.
Thank you for proving that after a YEAR. Democrats / snowflakes can not even prove a crime was committed warranting Mueller's investigation.
Without a crime, they want partisan license to dig through every detail of the President's life in an attempt to find anything on him which they can use to Impeach him simply because they are pissed he beat Hillary in 2016 and refuse to accept the outcome of the election.
View attachment 170765
'Nuff said.
"perhaps" and "probably" dont prove everything.
Mueller knows alot more than the public knows.
Bannon said, "This is all about money laundering. Mueller chose [senior prosecutor Andrew] Weissmann first and he is a money-laundering guy. Their path to fucking Trump goes right through [former Trump campaign manager] Paul Manafort, Don Jr. and Jared Kushner. It’s as plain as a hair on your face."
However, even if some oligarch money is "earned" in Russia through nefarious means, that doesn't mean a US law was broken. Russia ain't complaining. Any Russian who complained is getting Putin plutonium dessert. So long as Trump legally listed the investment on tax and biz disclosures he has to file, that's not per se a crime.