Juan de Fuca
Gold Member
- May 24, 2016
- 3,254
- 452
- 130
Benghazi - three key facts:
.
- Prior notification of a threat - American embassy officials and Ambassador Stevens repeatedly requested additional security for the Benghazi compound between 2011 and 2012 and the requests were either denied or ignored.
- During a known threat no action was taken - During the attack on the Benghazi compound calls were made for immediate assistance and nothing was done.
- The Ambassador was not a soldier.
During 2011/12, Congress cut the security budget for diplomatic outposts by 1/3. In spite of this constraint, there had been numerous upgrades to the Benghazi facility in the months leading up to the attack. New fencing and better lighting had been installed, among other improvements, but Republicans stubbornly refused to increase the budget.
This is an outright lie. See Benghazi Reports 1 through 7. All of them say this is a false narrative.
Ambassador Stevens was told not to go to Benghazi that day, and he chose to go anyway. Everyone there knew the risks and the State Department had warned all outposts, especially those in the Middle East, of the risks leading up to the anniversary of 9/11.
But continue to believe your alternative version of reality, so you can hate on Obama and Hillary.
Cut security? The evil douchebag who was Secretary of State couldn't figure out that she could move embassy guards from Ottawa and Toronto to Libya?
Are you freaking kidding me?
Did you know who the guards were? Because she didn't like the optics of US Military guarding the compound she hired a well known militia group with ties to AQ to guard Stevens.
Not just one, but two Congressional investigative bodies found no evidence of wrongdoing. Are you trying to rewrtite history here?