Summary of Evidence Released - What It Says

[jillian]

Well the investigation will continue. And now republicans won't be able to whine that this info that came out will end the investigation, because, of course, it won't have.

This drives a huge stake in the heart of any continuing investigation of Trump, especially since going into year 2 the Democrats still can't even produce evidence that a crime was ever committed warranting an investigation...

...and since this Summary of EVIDENCE proves that to get an excuse to start up an investigation the DOJ and FBI had to conspire / collude with a foreign spy who was, as the FBI assessed, desperate to prevent Trump from winning the Presidency...as they (Obama, Hillary, FBI, DOJ...) were.

This is the biggest 'boomerang' to date, coming back to hit the conspirators right in the throat! Every one of them involved should be PERP-WALKED immediately...

This drives a huge stake in the heart of any continuing investigation of Trump, especially since going into year 2 the Democrats still can't even produce evidence that a crime was ever committed warranting an investigation...

...and since this Summary of EVIDENCE proves that to get an excuse to start up an investigation the DOJ and FBI had to conspire / collude with a foreign spy who was, as the FBI assessed, desperate to prevent Trump from winning the Presidency...as they (Obama, Hillary, FBI, DOJ...) were.

You are a flaming retard, dude.

The Page FISA application in question was from Oct of 16.

The counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling and Trump involvement started in Jul of 16.


It obviously was not what started the investigation.

true... but if he didn't spread Vladimir's word, Sergei wouldn't have anything to say.

 

[Doc1]

And the dossier that clinton had steele lie about was the gospel.....right?

jebus christo, you are just bat shit crazy!

No, that would be you. A FISA Warrant was issued because the Judge was led yo believe in the veracity of the "Dossier". A "Dossier" that is completely false.

This is where your whole delusional house of cards fails.

You all retardedly believe the dossier to be completely false.

The truth is, you don't know that.

LOL, this is where your entire world falls apart the entire "Dossier is unproven and has been for over a year. It was the ONLY evidence used to get a FISA Warrant. That makes any and ALL evidence or potential evidence null and void because it was illegally obtained. You guys are having a BAD week.

Lying doesn’t help you. Parts of the dossier were confirmed.

Afraid not son. If it has I'm all eyes, lay it on me.

 

[jillian]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

 

[Flopper]

Obvious now why McCabe decided to get out of Dodge

As I understand this thing, McCabe testified before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence composed of 13 republicans and 9 democrats members chaired by republican, Devin Nunes who wrote a memo that summaries secret testimony of various people including Andrew McCabe, who was involved in getting a FISA surveillance warrant against various republican members of the Trump campaign, including Carter Page. Not surprising, this summary focused on one piece of information, the Steele Report which came from Democrats which was only one of a number of pieces of evidence in the application for surveillance. There was no discussion of any information in the Steele report except that it came from Democrats and no mention of any other evidence. So we are left with the conclusion that the warrant was based on bogus information. Well, at least that was the intent.

Releasing this letter is clearly a political move to discredit the FBI and Justice Dept. in hopes that it will rub off on the Mueller investigation. One has to wonder why the president is willing to go to such extreme measures if there is no wrong doing.

 

[Doc1]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

You're lie, if not, prove it has been confirmed. Go ahead, show us sweet cheeks.

 

[RWNJ]

LOLOL

Suuure.... meanwhile, the Russia investigation continues and nothing in this Nunes nothing burger is going to stop it.

It just came out today rube....give it time...

And there are still those five months of no longer missing text messages. Can't wait until they release those. You libs, who think this is just a nothing burger, are in for a shock.

 

[Snouter]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

 

[deanrd]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

You're lie, if not, prove it has been confirmed. Go ahead, show us sweet cheeks.

Some good reading:

Here is the Nunes memo:

http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180129/106822/HMTG-115-IG00-20180129-SD001.pdf

Here is an explanation on how to get a FISA warrant.

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/sojudge.pdf

 

[Doc1]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

" As of December 2017[update], the dossier is "uncorroborated but not disproved".[9][10]"

List of Trump–Russia dossier allegations - Wikipedia

 

[Doc1]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

You're lie, if not, prove it has been confirmed. Go ahead, show us sweet cheeks.

Some good reading:

Here is the Nunes memo:

http://docs.house.gov/meetings/IG/IG00/20180129/106822/HMTG-115-IG00-20180129-SD001.pdf

Here is an explanation on how to get a FISA warrant.

https://fas.org/irp/agency/doj/fisa/sojudge.pdf

I've read it, I also know full well how the FISC works, sorry.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

Let me guess, you get your news from Alex Jones, The Family Research Council, and World Net Daily

 

[Doc1]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

Shillian just makes her shit up as she goes. She can't stand the thought that her "side" could possibly have done anything wrong and even if it did she wouldn't care. To her the ends justify the means.

 

[NYcarbineer]

The absurdity of the memo?

The memo is a cherrypicked version of the facts that then makes as its main charge that the FBI cherrypicked the information they gave to the FISA judges.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

Shillian just makes her shit up as she goes. She can't stand the thought that her "side" could possibly have done anything wrong and even if it did she wouldn't care. To her the ends justify the means.

And then you give us a long list of what you believe YOUR side could have done wrong.

 

[Snouter]

Let me guess, you get your news from Alex Jones, The Family Research Council, and World Net Daily

Incorrect!

 

[jc456]

House Intelligence memo released: What it says


* The Steele dossier formed an essential part of the intial and all three renewal FISA applications against Carter Page.


* Andrew McCabe confirmed that no FISA warrant would have been sought from the FISA Court without the Steele dossier information.

* The political origins of the Steele dossier were known to senior DOJ and FBI officials, but excluded from the FISA applications.

* DOJ official Bruce Ohr met with Steele beginning in the summer of 2016 and relayed to DOJ information about Steele's bias. Steele told Ohr that he, Steele, was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected president and was passionate about him not becoming president.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLO

Need I remind the reader that eastt65 is insane?

so what does that make you?

 

[RWNJ]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

Shillian just makes her shit up as she goes. She can't stand the thought that her "side" could possibly have done anything wrong and even if it did she wouldn't care. To her the ends justify the means.

The difference between dems and republicans is that Democrats will defend their party, no matter what...Unless there is political gain involved. Then they will turn on each other. Republicans, on the other hand will usually disown anyone acting like one of those liberal crooks.

 

[Doc1]

Let me guess, jillian, you get your info from fake news MSNBC and CNN?

Shillian just makes her shit up as she goes. She can't stand the thought that her "side" could possibly have done anything wrong and even if it did she wouldn't care. To her the ends justify the means.

And then you give us a long list of what you believe YOUR side could have done wrong.

I have no trust in any Gov, fact...unlike you I am not a partisan.

 

[healthmyths]

Update: The latest Analysis From CNN:

What the Nunes memo actually proves (Not much) - CNNPolitics

Selected Excerpts

The memo's biggest claim is that then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe told the House Intelligence Committee that no FISA warrant would have been issued relating to one-time Trump campaign adviser Carter Page without the so-called Steele dossier -- the work of a former British spy named Christopher Steele that was being secretly funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The House Intelligence Committee was not made aware of the financing behind the Steele dossier during its investigation.

That could be a big deal. Except, we don't know for sure that the timeline of events -- and the reporting on who said what when -- in the Nunes memo correlates with the objective truth. Why? Because the actual FISA court warrants are classified. And because Democratic sources familiar with the Intelligence Committee testimony suggested Friday that McCabe did not, in fact, say that the FISA warrant would have never been issued if not for the Steele dossier.

McCabe admitted to reliance on the Steele dossier -- portions of which have never been confirmed by the FBI! And he didn't tell the Intelligence Committee who was paying for the memo! And a bunch of Justice Department officials -- including current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein -- signed off on one of these FISA warrants!

Actually, that could be trouble for the FBI

It might be! But, here's the thing: We -- and Trump -- have no way of knowing that because, not to beat a dead horse, but a) The FISA warrants in question are still classified and b) We don't know for sure that what Nunes said McCabe said is the full picture.

hashtag #releasethememo has been a steady drumbeat for Republicans convinced, like Trump, that something's rotten in the Justice Department. Democrats have, on the other hand, lined up in unanimous opposition to the release of the memo -- suggesting it represents not only a break with the apolitical way in which the Intelligence Committee has operated in the past but also creates a real threat to the country going forward.

The FBI is run by a man named Christopher Wray. He was Trump's hand-picked successor after the President fired James Comey. Rosenstein, who is tasked with overseeing the investigation into Russia's attempted meddling in the 2016 election because Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself, is, like Wray, a pick of Trump's Justice Department.
And yet, both men opposed the release of the Nunes memo.

So. The FBI, which is run by a man Trump hand-picked to run it, says the memo commits the sin of omission and, by doing so, doesn't present a totally accurate picture.

So, can we all go home now?

the Steele dossier has been largely confirmed. Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI. and that dossier wasn't initially a dem project. it was oppo research for a GOP candidate.

as to the FISA warrant, this was a renewal of the FISA warrant on Carter Page, who was long a subject of surveillance because of his shady dealings with Russian spies.

You wrote: "Steele was the only person who saw Donald's corruption who was decent enough to report it to the FBI"

So if I were to report to the FBI that YOU were the ONLY one to have seen:
" Obama having sex in the backseat of a limousine with Larry Sinclair in 1999 after he met Obama at a Chicago nightclub. They left together in a limo. Obama then obtained cocaine and crack and Sinclair performed oral sex on him. He will take a lie detector test to back up his claims.
Minnesota Man Says He Used Cocaine and Had Oral Sex With Barack Obama
that would be more than enough evidence to for FISA warrant against Obama???

 

[depotoo]

Which part? That Russia has a file on a former US official, Hillary? That would be considered minimal, as was stated. I’ll bet we have one on Russian officials.

And the dossier that clinton had steele lie about was the gospel.....right?

jebus christo, you are just bat shit crazy!

No, that would be you. A FISA Warrant was issued because the Judge was led yo believe in the veracity of the "Dossier". A "Dossier" that is completely false.

This is where your whole delusional house of cards fails.

You all retardedly believe the dossier to be completely false.

The truth is, you don't know that.

LOL, this is where your entire world falls apart the entire "Dossier is unproven and has been for over a year. It was the ONLY evidence used to get a FISA Warrant. That makes any and ALL evidence or potential evidence null and void because it was illegally obtained. You guys are having a BAD week.

Lying doesn’t help you. Parts of the dossier were confirmed.