Ghost of a Rider
Gold Member
- Jan 29, 2018
- 5,011
- 2,170
You’re the one who’s always bringing up penis sizes so you tell me.
A man who is swayed by marketing directed at the male ego is nuts or crazy or retarded. But then if a man “whines” too much (by your estimation), you insult his male ego by calling him “Dick Tiny”.
It seems to me that you’re the one who’s confused here and maybe not quite so well adjusted.
I don't need a gun to prove my manhood... some of you apparently do.
It may not be guns but it’s obvious you need something to prove your manhood or you wouldn’t keep calling us “Dick Tiny”.
I handled enough guns in the Army to last me six lifetimes, if I never see another one, that's fine. I just want to make sure people like Adam Lanza don't get them. If you are telling me we can't do that without taking away your guns, too.... I REALLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT.
I’m not telling you anything other than that the specific brand and model of the gun used is immaterial. Lanza could have done just as much damage with a handgun, a shotgun or even a knife.
Shooting up a school is like - if you’ll pardon the metaphor - shooting fish in a barrel. In a situation like that, children are scared shitless and just want to get the fuck away from the shooter. In other words, no one is shooting back so he can go from victim to victim and kill at his leisure.
Now, if you can come up with a way that keeps Adam Lanza from getting a gun, but you get to keep yours, I'm all for it.
No you’re not. You’d just as soon they all go away even if no one is ever killed by one again. And as I said before, I don’t own an AR-15.
Irrelevant. Your argument that it wouldn’t have happened if Nancy hadn’t had the guns in the house is still null and void.
No one else would have given that crazy retard a gun.
The guns didn’t belong to him and nobody gave them to him.
I have no doubt of that. That’s why I’m glad you’re not on the jury. In fact, you should never be on any jury. You are not capable of objectivity and are too easily swayed by your emotions. You would be pure poison to any legal trial.
Actually, I'd be the one calling bullshit on the lawyers and getting to the truth.
You wouldn’t be “getting to the truth”, you’d be trying to make the gun company guilty no matter what the truth is.
The truth is, Remington KNEW that crazy people were buying their weapons... they didn't care. In fact, they saw crazy people as their prime market.
THAT'S WHY THEY ARE GUILTY.
No. This is your emotions getting the best of you.
Do gun manufacturers know that some people will use their product unlawfully? Of course.
Do car manufacturers know that some people will drink and drive or text and drive and kill people? Of course.
Do makers of four wheelers and dirt bikes know some people will use their product recklessly and get themselves killed? Of course.
So why should a manufacturer of firearms be held accountable if a customer knowingly chooses to break the law with their product but not a car manufacturer if someone knowingly breaks the law by drinking and driving?
I don't give a fuck about "Law", I care about JUSTICE.
No you don’t. If you were then you would be aware of the facts of the case and you wouldn’t persist with and perpetuate falsehoods even after knowing the facts.
You are so obsessed with making Nancy out to be insane and directly at fault that you can’t even bring yourself to acknowledge that they were able to get data off Lanza’s computer for Christ’s sake. You couldn’t acknowledge this because the data showed he had been planning the shooting for a year and thus it blew a hole in your argument that her trip sent him over the edge.
Your hate and contempt for gun owners oozes from every one of your posts and is obvious to everyone here. Your judgments and motives simply can’t be trusted.