Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow, aa deranged lunatic like you says the numbers are crap....I'll notify the democrat media...
Wow, aa deranged lunatic like you says the numbers are crap....I'll notify the democrat media...
Guy, you use bulllshit numbers all the time like 12 mass shootings (the numbers are in the hundreds) and 600 million guns (the actual number is 300 million).
Even your claim that there are 18 million AR 15's out there is wrong... the actual number is probably 5 million.
AR-15 style rifle - Wikipedia
Moron, I don't claim anything....Mother Jones lists all
Tiny Dick…
You should stop projecting your sexual inadequacies on others. It only makes you come across as even more stupid and pathetic than you otherwise would.
You should stop projecting your sexual inadequacies on others. It only makes you come across as even more stupid and pathetic than you otherwise would.
Naw, guy, I'm not the one who needs military grade weapons to make up for my short comings and lives in fear the ATF will "emasculate" me... that's you guys.
Joe, do you know why gun owners are up in arms (pun intended) over all this? They’re not worried about being “emasculated” by having their guns being taken away by the government, they’re simply worried that the government will take their guns, a Constitutionally protected right.
They’re worried about government overreach, excessive bureaucracy, excessive government power and precedents.
Gun owners and gun control advocates both know that if ARs are banned, it won’t stop there. Gun control advocates won’t admit it of course but deep down where the worms are squirming through the muck, they know it to be true and in fact, desire it.
Joe, do you know why gun owners are up in arms (pun intended) over all this? They’re not worried about being “emasculated” by having their guns being taken away by the government, they’re simply worried that the government will take their guns, a Constitutionally protected right.
They’re worried about government overreach, excessive bureaucracy, excessive government power and precedents.
Gun owners and gun control advocates both know that if ARs are banned, it won’t stop there. Gun control advocates won’t admit it of course but deep down where the worms are squirming through the muck, they know it to be true and in fact, desire it.
The anti-gun wishful thinking that fewer Americans now own guns....so that they can use that to convince weak politicians to ban them.......
Joe, do you know why gun owners are up in arms (pun intended) over all this? They’re not worried about being “emasculated” by having their guns being taken away by the government, they’re simply worried that the government will take their guns, a Constitutionally protected right.
They’re worried about government overreach, excessive bureaucracy, excessive government power and precedents.
Gun owners and gun control advocates both know that if ARs are banned, it won’t stop there. Gun control advocates won’t admit it of course but deep down where the worms are squirming through the muck, they know it to be true and in fact, desire it.
View attachment 294904
I'm amused you guys really think this is about what a bunch of slave rapists wanted... or that anyone would buy that
Realistically, I'd be fine if all privately owned guns are banned because there is NO GOOD REASON for you to own a gun if you aren't a cop or a soldier. Realistically, I'd be fine with just keeping military grade weapons out of the hands of the Adam Lanzas and Nicholas Cruzes of the world.
As I've pointed out, for the small fraction of you that are gun nuts, the REST of us have to live with active shooter drills, metal detectors, and a prison industrial complex.
The anti-gun wishful thinking that fewer Americans now own guns....so that they can use that to convince weak politicians to ban them.......
Guns have been in decline for quite a while..>the problem is that there are more and more nuts like you who need to stockpile them.
12 million dead men, women and children, murdered by socialists like you joe, would disagree about gun ownership and the government.........
12 million dead men, women and children, murdered by socialists like you joe, would disagree about gun ownership and the government.........
One more time. There were a shitload of guns in Nazi Germany... just no one wanted to put his life on the line to save a Jew.
Trust me,when the ATF comes for you... your neighbors won't be rushing out to save you, either. They'll probably be glad you are being taken away because you were frightening them.
Joe, do you know why gun owners are up in arms (pun intended) over all this? They’re not worried about being “emasculated” by having their guns being taken away by the government, they’re simply worried that the government will take their guns, a Constitutionally protected right.
They’re worried about government overreach, excessive bureaucracy, excessive government power and precedents.
Gun owners and gun control advocates both know that if ARs are banned, it won’t stop there. Gun control advocates won’t admit it of course but deep down where the worms are squirming through the muck, they know it to be true and in fact, desire it.
I'm amused you guys really think this is about what a bunch of slave rapists wanted... or that anyone would buy that
Realistically, I'd be fine if all privately owned guns are banned because there is NO GOOD REASON for you to own a gun if you aren't a cop or a soldier.
Realistically, I'd be fine with just keeping military grade weapons out of the hands of the Adam Lanzas and Nicholas Cruzes of the world.
As I've pointed out, for the small fraction of you that are gun nuts, the REST of us have to live with active shooter drills, metal detectors, and a prison industrial complex.
And one more time....asshat...
In the 1920s they registered guns in German.
In the 1930s the national socialists used the registration lists to take guns away from their enemies.
What amuses you is irrelevant. This is the reason gun owners are against gun control.
Also, those same “bunch of slave rapists” also wanted free speech, freedom of religion and due process, among other things; all of which I’m sure you agree with. Tell me I’m wrong.
Don’t insult my intelligence. You just said you’d be fine with no one having firearms.
For your information dumbass, ALL of us have to live with these things.
I don’t like this shit any more than you. I just don’t delude myself into thinking that it’s all the fault of legal and law abiding gun owners just because I hate them. I’m also intelligent enough to see the bigger picture and know that the problem is cultural and that merely depriving law abiding gun owners of their firearms won’t solve the problem.
What amuses you is irrelevant. This is the reason gun owners are against gun control.
Also, those same “bunch of slave rapists” also wanted free speech, freedom of religion and due process, among other things; all of which I’m sure you agree with. Tell me I’m wrong.
I'd rather have freedom of religion and a responsible press that doesn't destroy people's lives.
Given you are perfectly fine with Smirky Sandmann Suing the WaPo for merely showing his slappable face, I don't think you are that committed to free speech or the free press.
Don’t insult my intelligence. You just said you’d be fine with no one having firearms.
You've told me that you can't keep them out of their hands without infringing on everyone's right. Fine. You tell me how you are going to keep guns out of the hands of the next mass shooter, I'll be happy to listen.
For your information dumbass, ALL of us have to live with these things.
I don’t like this shit any more than you. I just don’t delude myself into thinking that it’s all the fault of legal and law abiding gun owners just because I hate them. I’m also intelligent enough to see the bigger picture and know that the problem is cultural and that merely depriving law abiding gun owners of their firearms won’t solve the problem.
No, we don't have to live with those things.
Countries with common sense gun laws DON'T have those things.
What amuses you is irrelevant. This is the reason gun owners are against gun control.
Also, those same “bunch of slave rapists” also wanted free speech, freedom of religion and due process, among other things; all of which I’m sure you agree with. Tell me I’m wrong.
I'd rather have freedom of religion and a responsible press that doesn't destroy people's lives.
Right. Given to you by a group of people who, when they also give you the right to bear arms, are suddenly a bunch of “slave rapists”. You’re full of shit.
Given you are perfectly fine with Smirky Sandmann Suing the WaPo for merely showing his slappable face, I don't think you are that committed to free speech or the free press.
I’ve never said anything one way or the other about Sandmann’s lawsuit and I don’t give a shit about it.
While I think the media is guilty of conflating and sensationalizing the story and that the way they went about it helped stoke animosity and hatred against Sandmann, they were careful to word their stories and headlines to where I don’t think Sandmann will win his case.
In reality, they wouldn’t have needed to sensationalize anyway because everyone had a liberal aneurism and threw objectivity right out the window the moment they saw the MAGA hat.
Don’t insult my intelligence. You just said you’d be fine with no one having firearms.
You've told me that you can't keep them out of their hands without infringing on everyone's right. Fine. You tell me how you are going to keep guns out of the hands of the next mass shooter, I'll be happy to listen.
I don’t know what the solution is but I know what it is not. Banning firearms is not and will not be the end-all/be-all solution for avoiding mass shootings.
The problem of mass killings has been simmering for some time and there are multiple factors involved, the least of which is the firearm itself.
Guns are merely a tool and are incapable of killing unless someone picks it up and uses it for that purpose.
So the question is, why are we seeing an upsurge in mass shootings now, in the last twenty years or so, when the semiautomatic rifle has been around and available to consumers for eighty to a hundred years?
For your information dumbass, ALL of us have to live with these things.
I don’t like this shit any more than you. I just don’t delude myself into thinking that it’s all the fault of legal and law abiding gun owners just because I hate them. I’m also intelligent enough to see the bigger picture and know that the problem is cultural and that merely depriving law abiding gun owners of their firearms won’t solve the problem.
No, we don't have to live with those things.
Didn’t say we did.
Countries with common sense gun laws DON'T have those things.
Norway, 2011 - 77 people killed; remains the worst mass shooting/killing in history.
France, 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting - 12 people killed.
France, 1978 Marseille bar massacre; 10 people killed.
Belgium, 2011 Liege attack - 6 people killed.
Russia, 2010 Chechen Parliament attack - 6 killed.
Spain, 1990 Puerto Hurraco shooting - 9 killed.
Need I go on? There are many more examples but I think you get the point.
What amuses you is irrelevant. This is the reason gun owners are against gun control.
Also, those same “bunch of slave rapists” also wanted free speech, freedom of religion and due process, among other things; all of which I’m sure you agree with. Tell me I’m wrong.
I'd rather have freedom of religion and a responsible press that doesn't destroy people's lives.
Right. Given to you by a group of people who, when they also give you the right to bear arms, are suddenly a bunch of “slave rapists”. You’re full of shit.
Given you are perfectly fine with Smirky Sandmann Suing the WaPo for merely showing his slappable face, I don't think you are that committed to free speech or the free press.
I’ve never said anything one way or the other about Sandmann’s lawsuit and I don’t give a shit about it.
While I think the media is guilty of conflating and sensationalizing the story and that the way they went about it helped stoke animosity and hatred against Sandmann, they were careful to word their stories and headlines to where I don’t think Sandmann will win his case.
In reality, they wouldn’t have needed to sensationalize anyway because everyone had a liberal aneurism and threw objectivity right out the window the moment they saw the MAGA hat.
Don’t insult my intelligence. You just said you’d be fine with no one having firearms.
You've told me that you can't keep them out of their hands without infringing on everyone's right. Fine. You tell me how you are going to keep guns out of the hands of the next mass shooter, I'll be happy to listen.
I don’t know what the solution is but I know what it is not. Banning firearms is not and will not be the end-all/be-all solution for avoiding mass shootings.
The problem of mass killings has been simmering for some time and there are multiple factors involved, the least of which is the firearm itself.
Guns are merely a tool and are incapable of killing unless someone picks it up and uses it for that purpose.
So the question is, why are we seeing an upsurge in mass shootings now, in the last twenty years or so, when the semiautomatic rifle has been around and available to consumers for eighty to a hundred years?
For your information dumbass, ALL of us have to live with these things.
I don’t like this shit any more than you. I just don’t delude myself into thinking that it’s all the fault of legal and law abiding gun owners just because I hate them. I’m also intelligent enough to see the bigger picture and know that the problem is cultural and that merely depriving law abiding gun owners of their firearms won’t solve the problem.
No, we don't have to live with those things.
Didn’t say we did.
Countries with common sense gun laws DON'T have those things.
Norway, 2011 - 77 people killed; remains the worst mass shooting/killing in history.
France, 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting - 12 people killed.
France, 1978 Marseille bar massacre; 10 people killed.
Belgium, 2011 Liege attack - 6 people killed.
Russia, 2010 Chechen Parliament attack - 6 killed.
Spain, 1990 Puerto Hurraco shooting - 9 killed.
Need I go on? There are many more examples but I think you get the point.
I think the reason we are seeing more? The breakdown of the family, and more fatherless homes......most of the shooters....almost all, lacked fathers in the home, then add to that 24/7 media coverage, and social media which gives shooters a fame they didn't have before......
You forgot the French rock concert attack....130 killed by terrorists with fully automatic military rifles, pistols and grenades, terrorists who were already on French government, terrorist watch lists.....
Also, just recently, the Russian Polytechnic shooting, 20 killed, 40 injured with a pump action, 5 shot, shotgun....
Right. Given to you by a group of people who, when they also give you the right to bear arms, are suddenly a bunch of “slave rapists”. You’re full of shit.
In reality, they wouldn’t have needed to sensationalize anyway because everyone had a liberal aneurism and threw objectivity right out the window the moment they saw the MAGA hat.
Guns are merely a tool and are incapable of killing unless someone picks it up and uses it for that purpose.
So the question is, why are we seeing an upsurge in mass shootings now, in the last twenty years or so, when the semiautomatic rifle has been around and available to consumers for eighty to a hundred years?
.Need I go on? There are many more examples but I think you get the point.
The attacks in Europe and elsewhere are almost always driven by political or religious ideals whereas in the U.S., a common thread seems to be depression and other mental problems.
